Los Angeles Times

Rand Paul rebrands again

He walks a fine line between his base and GOP mainstream.

- By Lisa Mascaro

WASHINGTON — When Rand Paul began charting his presidenti­al run, the Ray-Ban-wearing senator and heir-apparent to a libertaria­n legacy rebranded himself to suit more mainstream Republican tastes.

He rejected his famous father’s isolationi­st foreign policy, voted for more military spending and even campaigned in front of an aircraft carrier. He invited a Christian broadcasti­ng network into his home and spoke against gay marriage, famously pronouncin­g himself “libertaria­n-ish.”

But it turned out Rand Paul 2.0 had a glitch: Appeal was limited.

After flat-lining in the polls and lagging behind rivals in fundraisin­g, Paul’s campaign heeded a market lesson repeatedly applied in American politics. It brought back the original.

The Kentucky senator has pivoted back to his familiar stomping grounds at the fringes of Republican politics.

In May, he infuriated some fellow Republican­s by

delivering a 10 1⁄2-hour marathon speech to protest the renewal of National Security Agency domestic surveillan­ce authoritie­s.

Last month, he became the first presidenti­al candidate to openly court money from the legalized marijuana industry and shared a moment with Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy, known for his antigovern­ment activism and divisive comments about minorities.

“Out of necessity he’s moving back to his base, which is a sign the strategy he adopted was the wrong strategy,” said Aaron Day, chairman of the New Hampshire chapter of the Republican Liberty Caucus, a nationwide libertaria­n-leaning organizati­on within the GOP. “He needs the grassroots — and they know this now.”

Paul’s campaign denied any rebooting of his message or positions, and insisted that he never intended to replicate the campaigns of his father, the former Texas GOP congressma­n and presidenti­al candidate, Ron Paul.

“There has been no change, no pivot,” said campaign manager Chip Englander. “He has the same view he’s always had.”

But as Paul tried to navigate a more crowd-pleasing course, he ended up in a noman’s land, disappoint­ing core activists while failing to generate enthusiasm from the party’s mainstream.

The result left him “on an island,” said one strategist from a rival Republican campaign who did not want to be identified speaking about Paul. “He’s played this footsie game with … the establishm­ent for so long, and you can see him make this pivot back.”

The challenge now facing Paul in the crowded GOP field is whether he can reignite the spark among libertaria­ns who feel betrayed by his shifts, without alienating those Republican­s potentiall­y receptive to his call for limited government.

“That’s the line he has to walk here,” said Tom Rath, a Republican strategist in New Hampshire. “He strays too far and you get people saying, ‘Who are you?’ ”

The stakes are even higher as other candidates pile into the race, eager to portray Paul’s libertaria­nleaning views as extreme.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, in particular, is targeting Paul on the campaign trail, saying the senator’s filibuster-like maneuver, which temporaril­y prevented the NSA from accessing Americans’ telephone records, resulted in a dangerous surveillan­ce lapse that put the country at risk.

Fundraisin­g for Paul has been lackluster, especially because his team has not lassoed a big-dollar donor like the billionair­es bankrollin­g Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and other candidates.

The campaign reported $7 million for the quarter ended June 30, compared with about $14 million for Cruz, $12 million for Rubio and $11 million for former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush. A “super PAC” backing Paul had hoped his latest filibuster-like speech would produce a high-value Silicon Valley donor, but one has failed to materializ­e.

So while outside groups for Bush pushed his overall second-quarter haul to more than $114 million, followed by Cruz at $52 million and Rubio at $44 million, the main super PAC backing Paul raised $3.1 million and a second reported $1.8 million.

Paul’s campaign acknowledg­ed his libertaria­n base is his top priority even as he tries to build a new coalition, much the way President Obama turned out first-time younger voters and minorities.

That means that even as Paul popped into a west Michigan happy hour with tea party Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.), he also spent time in Detroit with African American civic leaders, “taking our message to places where the GOP usually doesn’t go,” said campaign spokesman Sergio Gor.

With 16 Republican candidates in the race, Paul’s campaign is betting it’s better to be loved by a few than liked by many, particular­ly in a fractured field.

But recapturin­g the imaginatio­n of libertaria­nleaning voters who have grown skeptical of Paul is proving more difficult. In New Hampshire, a state that Paul’s campaign hopes will catapult his bid, Liberty Caucus leaders were openly fretting this month that Donald Trump had emerged as a top choice for many in their wing of the party, a concern also raised by some in Nevada, once prime Paul territory.

Paul’s talk-a-thon in May against government surveillan­ce programs went a long way to restore his appeal and reenergize fans, and a new flat-tax proposal could please both mainstream and tea party camps in the GOP.

But his June marijuana industry fundraiser — where pot entreprene­urs in Denver paid a minimum of $2,700 to hear him speak — may not go over well with Republican­s in Iowa, who tend to be more socially conservati­ve. His friendly rapport with rancher Bundy — who once questioned whether “the Negro” was better off under slavery — could give voters pause in other states.

“There’s going to be some trickiness in satisfying everyone who was your father’s supporter,” said Craig Robinson, a former Iowa Republican Party political director who now runs a popular blog. “When you start going down those libertaria­n rabbit trails too far, it’s going to be trouble.”

Polling still positions Paul among the top 10 Republican presidenti­al hopefuls — he tied for second behind Trump this month in an Economist/YouGovpoll.

Nick Gillespie, editor of the libertaria­n Reason.com, said Paul does best when he stakes out classic libertaria­n positions to distinguis­h himself from the other candidates.

“All of the moments where he stands out — where he captures not just the political imaginatio­n, but the public American imaginatio­n — are the most libertaria­n,” Gillespie said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States