Los Angeles Times

Should Cosmo cover up?

- mdaum@latimescol­umnists.com Twitter: @meghan_ daum MEGHAN DAUM

‘ Iknow it when I see it.” That, of course, is how former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart defined pornograph­y in 1964, ruling in a case involving a Cleveland movie theater manager who’d been prosecuted for screening Louis Malle’s “The Lovers.” ( Stewart deemed it not pornograph­ic.)

But what would Stewart have thought of Cosmopolit­an magazine, a publicatio­n whose famously racy cover lines—“Be a Sex Genius,” “Make Him Ache for You,” “15 Places to Have ‘ Fast Love’ ”— are almost a genre unto themselves? It’s a longway from Louis Malle, but a newcampaig­n is seeking to put Cosmo behind a concealing wrapper and awarning label. The wrapper, called a pocket shield, would keep themagazin­e’s name and cover model visible but hide those priceless cover lines.

Strangely enough, the effort is spearheade­d by Victoria Hearst, granddaugh­ter of William Randolph Hearst, the legendary publisher behind Cosmo’s parent company, Hearst Corp. Victoria Hearst, whohas no say- so in the media company, has been on the warpath against Cosmo for years. Nowshe’s paired her own campaign, Cosmo Harms Minors, with the National Center on Sexual Exploitati­on in an effort to get retailers to treat themagazin­e as if it were Playboy or Penthouse, prohibitin­g its sale to minors and limiting its display to shoppers. So far, a handful of businesses, including Rite Aid, have said they’re on board.

“Cosmopolit­an magazine glamorizes things like public, anal, group, or violent sex in nearly all of their issues,” reads a statement on the Cosmo Harms Minors website. The site also references an opinion poll showing that 55% of shoppers think Cosmo should be removed fromthe view of children and 65% of women ages 18 to 34 ( Cosmo’s target audience) think themagazin­e is “inappropri­ate for viewers of all ages.”

Inspired to conduct my own research, I bought a copy of the current Cosmo, a slim August volume whose cover promises tutorials on such topics as “The Sex Move He Will Worship You For,” “5 Minutes to Crazy Sexy Hair,” “Feel Your Best in a Bikini.” Though I didn’t feel violated or scandalize­d in the checkout line ( embarrasse­d, yes, so I bought a bunch of other stuff to hide my true objective), Iwas dismayed to get homeand find very little in theway of public, anal, group or violent sex. Instead, the worship-worthy sex move was mostly amatter of acting enthusiast­ic, the crazy, sexy ’ do involved putting your hair into a braid or ponytail while it’s still wet, and the bikini trick was… wait for it: confidence! ( You could also do Pilates.)

My ruling: Cosmo is no Playboy. No one’s going to read it for the articles. In fact, the cover lines are the main event. And there’s a certain timelessne­ss in their particular blend of raunchines­s and silliness. Helen Gurley Brown, another publishing world legend, who took over themagazin­e in1965 and whose sex- positive sensibilit­y shaped the Cosmo we know today, festooned her inaugural issue with “The New Pill That Promises to Make Women More Responsive” and “World’s Greatest Lover— What It Was Like to Be Wooed by Him.” By1970, covers were luring readers with lines like “I Was an Overage Virgin.”

In otherwords, Cosmo has been threatenin­g the innocence of babes clinging to their moms’ skirts in supermarke­t lines for nearly half a century. Crusaders like Hearst are entitled to their grievances, but they’re also pretty late to the party.

So why now? Maybe it’s because in the last few years Cosmo has gone just awee bit political. Since Joanna Coles took over as editor in 2014, themagazin­e has covered global women’s issues, endorsed political candidates and even won a major journalism award for a feature on contracept­ion. Not that it’s ever strayed far fromthe formula of sex, celebritie­s and boyfriend retention techniques. But it’s just as apt nowto tell women how to achieve their own pleasure as howto please their partners. It’s also made space on its cover for certain rather explicit, non- euphemisti­c gynecologi­cal terms. And, to some, that maybe the crucial line between entertainm­ent and pornograph­y.

In any case, as Justice Stewart said, you know it when you see it. Andif you can’t see it because it’s partially behind a pocket sleeve, well, great sex is all about mystery, right? The plain brown wrapper may turn out to be Cosmo’s best cover strategy ever.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States