Los Angeles Times

Audit finds improvemen­t at LAUSD

State says the school district has become faster and better at handling allegation­s of teacher misconduct.

- By Howard Blume howard.blume@latimes.com Twitter:@howardblum­e

Judging by the chorus of critics, the Los Angeles Unified School District does almost nothing right when it comes to allegation­s of teacher misconduct. And things never seem to improve.

One voice in that chorus, the state auditor, offered a different view in a just- released analysis: L. A. Unified is doing better, the auditor concluded. It’s even doing well.

Thenation’s second- largest school system made “dramatic improvemen­ts” in conducting faster investigat­ions, properly notified the state regarding allegation­s against teachers and managed legal claims and litigation more effectivel­y, auditors wrote.

“The district is pleased with the state auditor’s findings,” general counsel David Holmquist said. “This district remains committed to the safety of all students.”

One area of improvemen­t was in notifying the state of misconduct allegation­s. This notice allows the state to consider suspending or revoking a teaching credential and to provide notice to other potential employers of an instructor.

State law requires school districts to report within 30 days any case of a teacher’s change in employment status, such as a dismissal or other terminatio­n, as a result of an allegation of misconduct. Rules also require the district to notify the state within 10 days when a district puts a teacher on a mandatory leave of absence because of criminal charges or allegation­s of sexual misconduct involving a minor.

According to a 2012 audit by the same agency, L. A. Unified failed to provide proper notice to the state in at least 144 of 429 cases reviewed. The most recent review, which looked at instances of possible employee misconduct from April 2013 to May of this year, found the district handled 89 of 92 necessary reports without a mistake. The district also sharply reduced the number of unnecessar­y reports filed with the state.

In addition, a sample of cases reviewed also showed that L. A. Unified had re- duced the time needed to conduct an investigat­ion by half — to about five months.

The praise is far from unanimous, however.

Continuing critics include attorneys representi­ng teacher Rafe Esquith, whowas pulled from Hobart Boulevard Elementary School in April as part of an investigat­ion that began over a brief classroom literary reference to nudity.

Esquith, who has sued L. A. Unified, remains out of class and the inquiry has broadened to include a reviewof his-education- related nonprofit and “serious allegation­s of highly inappropri­ate conduct involving touching of minors before and during Mr. Esquith’s time at the School District,” according toa letter fromthe district to Esquith’s attorneys.

Esquith supporters have called the district investigat­ion a farce or worse and likened the school system to the mafia.

At another extreme, attorneys representi­ng alleged victims of former Miramonte Elementary teacher Mark Berndt have repeatedly questioned whether the district is doing enough to keep students safe from potential predators.

Just this week, the district agreed to pay $ 4.5 million more to former Miramonte students, bringing settlement­s in those cases to nearly $ 175 million.

Attorney John Manly, who represente­d some Miramonte families, called the report a “whitewash” that failed to focus on important factors affecting students, such as the reporting of abuse to law enforcemen­t and maintainin­g those records internally. He accused the district of trying to conceal informatio­n about problem teachers and the number of students making allegation­s, he said.

Manly cited the district’s ongoing attempt to limit its liability in the case of a 14year- old abused by a teacher.

“That position is repugnant and brings into sharp focus their institutio­nal hypocrisy when it comes to really protecting kids from predators,” Manly said.

Holmquist said the key issue in that case was not whether the girl bore any responsibi­lity for her abuse, but whether the district knew or should have known that the teacher was abusing her.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States