Los Angeles Times

VW CHEATED ON EMISSIONS TESTS

- By Jerry Hirsch

Volkswagen called them “clean diesels,” branding them as the fun-to-drive alternativ­es to hybrids as it dominated the U.S. market for the engine technology.

Turns out the increasing­ly eco-conscious buyers of the sporty German cars have been unwittingl­y pumping smog into the air — because of software VW installed to cheat on U.S. emissions tests.

The world’s largest automaker has admitted selling 482,000 such diesels since 2009, California and U.S. regulators announced Friday. The scandal could cost the company billions of dollars in fines and lawsuit judgments and threatens to stunt the developmen­t of all diesel vehicles.

VW’s software trick allows the cars to emit up to 40 times the legally allowed amount of nitrogen oxide, environmen­tal officials said. The automaker will have to recall all the vehicles and modify the emissions systems at its own expense, regulators said. Additional­ly it could face a fine of about $18 billion, or $37,500 per car, federal environmen­tal officials said.

“It’s pretty ugly,” Kelley Blue Book analyst Karl Brauer said. “Volkswagen has far outstrippe­d everyone else in selling diesel cars. This challenges everything they’ve been saying about those vehicles.”

Nitrogen oxide is among the auto pollu-

tants that put more smog into California’s skies, Air Resources Board Executive Officer Richard Corey said.

“Under the hot California sun [nitrogen oxide] cooks and creates ozone and fine particles,” Corey said.

Many owners of VW diesels — who tend to be enthusiast­s — were enraged at being deceived.

“It’s just a blatant disregard and intentiona­l manipulati­on of the system,” said Priya Shah, a San Francisco owner of a 2012 VW diesel Jetta station wagon. “Not only lying to the government, but also lying to your consumer. People buy diesel cars from VW because they feel they are clean diesel cars.”

Shah said the car is likely to be her last Volkswagen.

The affected diesel models include: Jetta (model years 2009-15), Beetle (model years 2009-15), Audi A3 (model years 2009-15), Golf (model years 2009-15) and Passat (model years 201215).

The EPA made its charges by sending Volkswagen a notice of violation of the Clean Air Act. It covers models equipped with 2.0-liter, four-cylinder diesel engines. The California Air Resources Board issued a similar letter for violations of state regulation­s.

Volkswagen and Audi vehicles from model years 2009 to 2015 have the software, which uses an algorithm that automatica­lly detects when the vehicle is undergoing pollution tests and changes the way it performs.

The EPA said the device senses the testing environmen­t by analyzing a variety of data — steering position, speed, duration of engine operation and barometric pressure.

“These inputs precisely track the parameters of the federal test procedure,” the agency wrote in its notice of violation to VW.

The test manipulati­on “is illegal and a threat to public health,” said Cynthia Giles, assistant administra­tor for the Office of Enforcemen­t and Compliance Assurance. “We expected better from VW.”

Volkswagen admitted that the cars contained “defeat devices,” after EPA and the state air regulator demanded an explanatio­n for the emission problems. VW is the world’s biggest auto company, outselling Toyota and General Motors this year. The automaker issued a statement saying it is cogrow operating with the investigat­ion and declined to comment further.

VW is also by far the industry leader in diesel car sales in the U.S. The German automaker last year sold 78,847 diesel passenger vehicles in the U.S., well ahead of its nearest competitor, according to online auto sales company TrueCar. Its corporate sibling Audi sold 15,732 vehicles during the same period.

Diesel vehicles made up about 3% of U.S. auto sales last year, similar to the share of hybrid cars. Many have viewed diesel as a promising green technology that could as the nation heads for more stringent fuel economy standards.

The state Air Resources Board became suspicious after hearing about emissions problems from automotive pollution analysts in Europe, Corey said. Additional­ly, researcher­s at West Virginia University, working with the Internatio­nal Council on Clean Transporta­tion, a nongovernm­ental organizati­on, raised questions about emissions levels.

Air board investigat­ors started testing the vehicles on a special dynamomete­r — a kind of treadmill for vehicle testing — and on the open road using portable equipment.

The investigat­ion showed the cars behaving quite differentl­y on the open road than in EPA testing environmen­ts. The agency devised a special test that detected how software on the engine’s electronic control module was fooling the certificat­ion tests.

VW programmed the engines to detect certificat­ion tests over many years and through three generation­s of engines, said Dave Sullivan, manager of product analysis at consulting firm AutoPacifi­c Inc. Officials did not specify VW’s motivation for cheating, but some benefits might be to increase realworld performanc­e or fuel economy, Sullivan said.

In addition to fines, VW is likely to face consumer lawsuits on two fronts, said Steve Berman, a class-action attorney in Seattle who has successful­ly brought such cases against Toyota, Hyundai among others.

Berman said he is already preparing a lawsuit on behalf of a Marin County, Calif., owner who bought a VW because it was marketed as a clean car and “now they find out it was polluting the environmen­t at 40 times standards.”

VW also will face what is known as a “diminished value” lawsuit because the vehicles are likely to lose some of their resale value because of the problem, he said.

“They will have to retool the emissions system, and that will hurt the performanc­e of the car,” Berman said.

Luke Tonachel, director of clean vehicles and fuels project at the Natural Resources Defense Council, was puzzled as to why VW would have to cheat.

“Other vehicle manufactur­ers don’t appear to be doing the same thing, but still get good performanc­e from diesel vehicles,” Tonachel said.

Consumers should not read VW’s action as an indictment of all diesel cars, said Don Anair, research director for the Clean Vehicles Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

“There has been major progress in advancing emissions controls for diesels over the past 10 years,” Anair said. “That’s a fact. This is a problem with the manufactur­er, not the technology.”

The automaker and regulators may have trouble getting consumers to bring their cars into get fixed — especially if the fix decreases performanc­e or fuel economy, the main selling points for the cars.

“It is not like the engines are catching on fire,” Sullivan said. “They will think that if it is not broken, why fix it?”

The public relations damage may ultimately be worse for the technology than the VW brand, TrueCar analyst Eric Lyman said. Volkswagen and Audi are largely responsibl­e for selling American consumers on the idea that “clean” diesel is a viable green alternativ­e.

“This is going to be a blow to the progress they’ve made and may call into question whether this is a clean technology at all,” Lyman said.

 ??  ?? 2013 VW BEETLE TDI
2013 VW BEETLE TDI
 ??  ?? 2015 VW JETTA TDI
2015 VW JETTA TDI
 ?? Volkswagen of America ?? 2015 VW GOLF TDI
Volkswagen of America 2015 VW GOLF TDI
 ??  ?? 2015 VW PASSAT TDI
2015 VW PASSAT TDI
 ??  ?? 2015 AUDI A3 TDI
2015 AUDI A3 TDI

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States