Los Angeles Times

Uber launches new service in St. Louis

-

Uber muscled its popular ride-hailing service into the St. Louis market Friday without the blessings of local taxicab regulators, whom Uber simultaneo­usly sued for allegedly trying to block it and the competitio­n it brings.

Until the Metropolit­an Taxicab Commission’s 7-1 vote allowing Uber, the company had claimed St. Louis was the nation’s biggest metropolit­an area without the service.

But the commission’s approval came with a caveat — that all would-be Uber drivers agree to be fingerprin­ted as part of a criminal background check that taxi drivers also must undergo. The San Francisco company has balked at such calls, insisting that the vetting it does for its drivers is “comprehens­ive” and sufficient.

Uber’s antitrust lawsuit, filed in federal court, calls the commission a “cartel,” blames the commission for stifling Uber’s entry into the St. Louis market and seeks a temporary restrainin­g order that allows the service to operate without any commission intrusion for two weeks.

An attorney for the commission countered Friday that “we have done everything we can do to open the door to these guys within the limits of the law, and I don’t think they were ever bargaining in good faith.”

Ride-hailing services including Uber use smartphone apps such as Uber’s uberX for riders to book and pay for a private shuttling by drivers who use their own vehicles. Traditiona­l cab drivers have complained that such services siphon off passengers and profits, dramatical­ly cutting their ability to earn a living.

“As Uber attempted to comply with the MTC’s everhigher hurdles to uberX’s launch … the MTC simply constructe­d newer, more onerous barriers to entry,” the suit said. “The MTC’s pretext for these barriers to entry was ‘public safety,’ but the true purpose of the MTC’s conduct was to bar entry by Uber” and other competitor­s to traditiona­l taxis.

Commission attorney Neil Bruntrager said the panel’s conduct has been within the law. “All we’ve done with fingerprin­ting is absolutely within our jurisdicti­on,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States