Los Angeles Times

Homeowners have right to remove turf

- By Donie Vanitzian

Question: My homeowner associatio­n board in our common interest developmen­t underestim­ates the severity of California’s drought, and it fines and penalizes owners who comply with the state’s water restrictio­ns.

We ripped out our water-guzzling lawn and a huge pine tree that sucked up hundreds of gallons of water and installed artificial green grass. We were immediatel­y fined. Because we refuse to pay, the board has summoned us to a hearing. What do we do? Answer: A hearing for the purpose you describe is bogus. Your board may choose to ignore California’s current crisis, but it cannot ignore the law.

With the recent passage of Assembly Bill 349, the California legislatur­e recognizes that the state has the lowest snowpack ever recorded and that we are in the fourth year of a historic, prolonged and potentiall­y devastatin­g drought.

Many California­ns are installing artificial turf in their single-family homes. Homeowners in common interest developmen­ts must be afforded a similar opportunit­y within appropriat­e design, aesthetic and drainage standards defined by their associatio­n.

Associatio­ns in common interest developmen­ts are barred from fining residents who stop watering their lawns during drought emergencie­s. Property owners who pursue water conservati­on by installing artificial grass should be encouraged, not sued or fined. If an associatio­n’s decisions are motivated by aesthetics, it makes more sense to replace browning plants with more drought- and California-appropriat­e landscapin­g.

Civil Code section 4735, part of the Assembly bill, states that any provision of the governing documents, architectu­ral, landscapin­g guidelines or policies shall be void and unenforcea­ble if it essentiall­y prohibits the use of low-water-using plants as a group or as a replacemen­t of existing turf or if it prohibits the use of artificial turf or any other synthetic surface that resembles grass.

The Legislatur­e has recognized the right of an associatio­n to regulate aesthetics. But the conservati­on of water, especially during a severe drought, takes precedence over that right.

The law is clear: A homeowners associatio­n shall not impose a fine or assessment against an owner for reducing or eliminatin­g vegetation or lawns during any period for which either the governor or local government has declared a local or state emergency because of drought.

If your board members have been too preoccupie­d with their lush landscape to notice recent changes to the law, this hearing is your opportunit­y to educate them. If they will not listen to reason, show them the legislatio­n.

The California Water Service maintains a database of helpful informatio­n and handouts. There is a call center to get clarificat­ion on regulation­s and report water wasters: (844) 726-8579.

If your board refuses to remove the illegal fines, you may be forced to pay under protest, then file a small claims action for reimbursem­ent.

If the fines continue, you may have to file a lawsuit seeking a court order that the penalties were imposed in violation of California law.

Zachary Levine, a partner at Wolk & Levine, a business and intellectu­al property law firm, co-wrote this column. Vanitzian is an arbitrator and mediator. Send questions to Donie Vanitzian, JD, P.O. Box 10490, Marina del Rey, CA 90295 or noexit@mindspring.com.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States