Los Angeles Times

Panel says missile downed airliner

Investigat­ors point to Buk weapons system, made in Russia, in the Malaysia jet disaster.

- By Henry Chu henry.chu@latimes.com Twitter: @HenryHChu

LONDON — A Netherland­s-led investigat­ion concluded Tuesday that a missile from a Russia-made Buk weapons system brought down Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 over eastern Ukraine last year.

All 298 people aboard probably died almost instantly, the Dutch Safety Board said. That finding probably brought comfort to victims’ relatives, who feared that some of their loved ones might have been conscious as they plummeted tens of thousands of feet to their deaths.

The crash report blamed Ukraine’s government for failing to close the airspace above the eastern part of the country while an armed conflict was underway in the area.

The investigat­ion did not address the crucial question of who fired the surface-toair missile, which is the subject of a separate inquiry due to publish its findings this year or in early 2016.

Still, Moscow

swiftly went into spin mode to try to deflect blame from Russiaback­ed separatist­s in eastern Ukraine who many in the West say were clearly responsibl­e for the disaster on July 17, 2014, over territory they control.

Hours before the Dutch report was released Tuesday afternoon, a state-controlled missile-maker in Russia said its own investigat­ion showed that damage patterns to the downed plane could not have been made by weapons currently found in Moscow’s arsenal and that the missile was fired from an area under the control of Ukrainian government forces, not the separatist­s.

Both the Russian and Ukrainian militaries have Buk missile systems, but the Almaz-Antey arms maker said the kind of missile implicated in the attack on MH17 was an older model that Russia no longer uses.

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov also dismissed the report as flawed, the Associated Press reported, saying that the “attempt to make a biased conclusion, in essence to carry out a political order, is obvious.”

In Washington, the White House welcomed the investigat­ion report as “an important milestone” in bringing those behind the rocket attack to justice. Ned Price, a spokesman for the National Security Council, said the United States remained convinced that the separatist­s were responsibl­e.

“Our assessment is unchanged: MH17 was shot down by a surface-to-air missile fired from separatist-controlled territory in eastern Ukraine,” Price said in a statement.

Tjibbe Joustra, chairman of the Dutch Safety Board, presented the investigat­ion’s findings at a news conference at Gilze-Rijen Air Force Base in the Netherland­s, where a partial reconstruc­tion of the front of the downed airliner, pieced together from wreckage recovered from the crash site, was dramatical­ly unveiled.

Joustra said the missile detonated within about 3 feet of the cockpit, just above and to the left of the nose of the Boeing 777. Microphone­s around the cockpit picked up a “sound peak” in the last millisecon­ds before the recordings went silent, which allowed analysts to determine where the explosion occurred.

Bits of cubic and bow-tie-shaped shrapnel penetrated the plane and were found embedded in the bodies of the three crew members in the cockpit, who were killed instantly, Joustra said. The plane broke apart in the air, with the tail falling to earth first and then the central section with the engines, which landed upside down and caught fire.

“Flight MH17 did not crash as a result of meteor strikes. We have excluded the possibilit­y of the airplane itself having any technical defect or that of a bomb exploding inside the aircraft,” Joustra said.

“Nor did Flight MH17 crash as the result of an airto-air attack,” he added, dismissing another scenario put forward by Russian critics who alleged that the plane was shot down by a Ukrainian fighter jet. The damage pattern would have been different, and radar would have picked up the presence of another aircraft, Joustra said.

The Netherland­s-led investigat­ion team included members from Russia, Ukraine, the United States and three other countries. All of them endorsed the finding that a missile brought down the airliner, but the Russian investigat­ors dissented from the conclusion that it was fired by a Buk, saying it was not possible to pinpoint the type of warhead and missile used, Joustra said.

Investigat­ors criticized the Ukrainian government for not recognizin­g the threat posed to civil aircraft in the skies over eastern Ukraine as forces loyal to Kiev fought the separatist­s on the ground.

Between July 14 and July 17 of last year, 61 operators from 32 countries flew above the contested territory, Joustra noted. There were 160 flights over the area on the day the plane was shot down, and three other planes were close by when MH17 — which was en route from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia — went down.

“Almost all operators were flying over that area, and why? Because nobody thought that civil aviation was at risk,” Joustra said.

But, he said, “there was sufficient reason to close the airspace above the eastern part of Ukraine as a precaution. The Ukraine authoritie­s failed to do so.”

Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte said the report, 15 months in the making, had confirmed “some of our most shocking suspicions.”

He said his Cabinet would take up some of the recommenda­tions of the report, including better internatio­nal coordinati­on of passenger lists.

 ?? Robin Van Lonkhuijse­n
European Pressphoto Agency ?? DUTCH SAFETY BOARD Chairman Tjibbe Joustra presents the findings at an air force base where the front of the plane had been partially reconstruc­ted.
Robin Van Lonkhuijse­n European Pressphoto Agency DUTCH SAFETY BOARD Chairman Tjibbe Joustra presents the findings at an air force base where the front of the plane had been partially reconstruc­ted.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States