Los Angeles Times

Google’s waiting on the DMV

The tech company is pressing California regulators to speed up the process.

- Associated press

The agency is struggling to settle questions that self-driving technology raises.

Hustling to bring cars that drive themselves to a road near you, Google finds itself somewhere that has frustrated many before: waiting on the California Department of Motor Vehicles.

The tech titan wants the freedom to give the public access to self-driving prototypes it has been testing on public roads since the summer. Before granting that permission, California regulators want Google to prove that these cars of the future already drive as safely as people.

The state Department of Motor Vehicles was supposed to write precedents­etting rules of the road by last Jan. 1. Nearly a year later, it is still struggling. After all, the agency is geared toward administer­ing driving tests and registerin­g cars, not settling complicate­d questions that the technology raises.

If the cars’ advanced sensors and computing power can drive better than humans, do they need a steering wheel and pedals? Would a person even need to be inside? Google says no on both.

Google says its cars have been involved in 17 collisions over 2.2 million miles of testing, nearly 1.3 million miles in self-driving mode. That accident rate appears to be higher than the rate for human drivers (although Google disputes that), but accident summaries Google has published say its cars did not cause any accident.

Regulators don’t want to be blamed for unnecessar­ily stalling the arrival of robochauff­eurs that can see farther, react faster and don’t text, speed or fall asleep. They’ve implored Google and traditiona­l automakers also developing the technology to share safety data, but companies in competitio­n don’t willingly reveal trade secrets.

Delay is not what Google had in mind when it pushed the 2012 legislatio­n that made California one of the few states officially to authorize self-driving cars. Google’s hope was to trade the independen­ce to innovate without government oversight for regulatory certainty.

Three years later, both a company that abhors bureaucrac­y and a DMV struggling to write rules beyond its expertise are exasperate­d.

Google has pressed California’s DMV to publish regulation­s far harder than any other company. Its 73 cars are among the 98 test vehicles that California’s DMV has given 10 companies permission to test publicly.

“Our team is concerned about the delay,” said an invitation for a conference call last December that Google sent California officials, who released it under a public records act request.

Both before and after, Google representa­tives consistent­ly checked with officials at the DMV and California State Transporta­tion Agency about the status of rules. State officials have trooped from Sacramento to Silicon Valley for test rides, while Google’s technical experts and lobbyists have headed to the capital for briefings or talks about regulation writing.

“The worst thing would be for California, sort of the birth state of this technology, to accidental­ly sort of shut things down,” Sarah Hunter, public policy director at the experiment­al lab that Google spun off to focus on ambitious projects such as self-driving cars and Internet-beaming balloons, said at a public presentati­on in September.

Shortly before, she jokingly jabbed a co-panelist who is the top DMV self-driving car official. Asked when self-driving technology would be “mainstream,” Hunter responded: “Whenever the DMV pass their operationa­l regulation­s.”

There’s frustratio­n to go around.

At the DMV, officials have pleaded for input from Google and traditiona­l automakers to help set a clear, objective safety standard. At a meeting in May in Washington, traditiona­l automakers joined Google in voicing concern that regulation — particular­ly in California — could stifle innovation.

There are no federal regulation­s on self-driving cars.

Still, California officials are “taking cues” from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administra­tion, said the state’s secretary of transporta­tion, Brian Kelly. NHTSA’s official position holds that any state that authorizes self-driving cars should require a licensed driver who can take control.

“My sense of it is we’re getting a go-slow message from the federal government,” Kelly said. He said that made sense for safety, but as a state famous for innovation, “we want to work through some of those sticky issues.” He hopes that the DMV will publish draft rules for public input by year’s end.

In interviews, NHTSA Administra­tor Mark Rosekind and his boss, U.S. Transporta­tion Secretary Anthony Foxx, said the federal government’s message to California was “go safe.” Intriguing as the technology’s life-saving potential may be, California should not hastily write new regulation­s, despite “pressure” to do so, Rosekind wrote DMV Director Jean Shiomoto in April.

 ?? Karl Mondon
Bay Area News Group/TNS ?? A GOOGLE self-driving car travels on public streets in Mountain View, Calif., in October. Its 73 cars are among the 98 test vehicles that California’s DMV has given 10 companies permission to test publicly.
Karl Mondon Bay Area News Group/TNS A GOOGLE self-driving car travels on public streets in Mountain View, Calif., in October. Its 73 cars are among the 98 test vehicles that California’s DMV has given 10 companies permission to test publicly.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States