Los Angeles Times

RX REDEFINED

LEXUS UPDATES ITS BEST- SELLING CROSSOVER

- BY MARK MAYNARD Maynard is the automotive editor at the San Diego Union- Tribune. Mark. Maynard@sduniontri­bune.com

L exus defined the budding “crossover” segment in 1998 with its first RX model. It was a radical concept and a striking design, at the time. It was SUV- like with a wagon’s simplicity and a level of luxury that beat anything the American motorist had experience­d.

Now in its fourth generation, the RX is still the brand’s best seller and it has been redesigned inside and out for 2016. The five- seat crossover is just slightly larger in width but 4.7 inches longer in length, now at 192.5 inches. And the wheelbase is longer by nearly two inches to 109.8 inches, allowing for back- seat room and cargo space. Ground clearance is up by 0.79 inch but the overall height is up just 0.4 inch.

Though no luxury crossover looks similar to the RX, identity is mandatory in this segment. The new body styling has a sinister face and a wide- mouth “spindle” grille. The side lines are handsome in a sleek, f loating roof appearance that is reminiscen­t of the Nissan Murano, another midsize, five- seat crossover.

Other RX comparable­s include the Acura MDX, Audi Q7, BMW X5, Lincoln MKX, Mercedes- Benz GLE- Class and Volvo XC90.

The RX has two powertrain choices, including the RX 450h Hybrid ($ 53,185). Sold in front or all- wheel- drive models, the gasoline- powered RX has starting prices of $ 42,850 and $ 44,280, including the $ 950 freight charge from Ontario, Canada.

Today’s tester is the RX 350 AWD FSport, which has a base price of $ 50,075 and was almost $ 60,000 with options.

The new RX is still in the midsize cate- gory of crossovers, but it does feel larger and sometimes bulky. The ride height is tall, but there are complex driver sightlines at the outstretch­ed windshield pillars and the broad side mirrors. Inside, there is considerab­le headroom in front ( 39.4 inches) with the moonroof and a grand 38 inches of rear legroom. But the doors feel very heavy.

The driver has command seating, but the center console could be better designed for a more convenient phone placement and e- bin charging. The cup holders have a spring- loaded bottom that will accommodat­e tall water bottles.

The second row has a f lat f loor and pleasing ride position, though the seat bottom is short for large adults. Cargo space spans 18.4- 56.3 cubic feet when the 40/ 20/ 30 back seat is folded. But at nearly $ 60,000, there were no power seat folders from the cargo area. There is an option ($ 200) for the tailgate to open with just a touch to the Lexus emblem. But it seemed just as simple to squeeze the release at the license plate frame.

The standard RX 350 has a luscious ride quality with buttery smooth steering force. The F- Sport treatment is a “man- up” package with more aggressive features and a sport- tuned suspension — but no increase in horsepower. Its ride quality is variable, ranging from svelte to trucky. An active stabilizer system works to keep the RX f lat through corners, but the F- Sport still felt husky in cornering transition­s.

And the F- Sport’s 20- inch tires seemed to generate more noise than I expected from a Lexus. The four- wheel vented disc brakes ( 12.9 inches front and 13.3 inches rear) have a smooth and secure grip.

The 295- horsepower, direct- injection 3.5- liter V- 6 has formidable power numbers, but they are constraine­d for fuel economy. The peak horsepower of 6,300 rpm is at redline and the peak 267 foot- pounds of torque hits at 4,700 rpm, a rev range where few will ever enjoy the full force.

Roll on the power from a start and the performanc­e is brisk. But make a sudden accelerati­on demand in the mid rpm range and the eight- speed automatic transmissi­on has to think about which gear should be grabbed, followed by a NASA blast of power. Trying to compensate the indecision by using Sport mode can be just too intense to use all the time. The full- time all- wheeldrive system has active torque control for sure- footed launch and side- to- side traction.

The F- Sport AWD has fuel economy ratings of 19 mpg city, 26 highway and 22 mpg combined; front- drive models are rated 20/ 28/ 23 mpg. My combined fuel economy ranged from about 18.6 to no higher than 19.3 mpg in a week of driving. The good side is that the V- 6 requires regular unleaded, not premium, and there is a 19.2- gallon fuel tank that allows a decent cruising range.

Moving the RX up in size allowed room in the lineup for the new compact class NX crossover. But the RX 350 is better suited to family use, it is a better taste of Lexus luxury and it looks stunning to the neighbors.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States