Los Angeles Times

‘Code of ethics’ has legal implicatio­ns

Signing this document could lead to a breach of fiduciary duty.

- By Donie Vanitzian when you feel the interests of the associatio­n demand it. Zachary Levine, a partner at Wolk & Levine, a business and intellectu­al property law firm, co-wrote this column. Vanitzian is an arbitrator and mediator. Send questions to Donie

Question: After I was elected to the board, the associatio­n’s manager contacted me and said I can’t attend a board meeting until I sign and agree to a “code of ethics.” It reads like a laundry list of what a board director should and should not do, including instructin­g board directors not to speak up and only act as a unanimous body with one voice — or not at all. I believe this infringes on my rights as a homeowner and director.

My personal attorney tells me that I should not sign it because it is not required by the law or our associatio­n’s governing documents. He explained that it has the effect of prejudicin­g my actions as a board director and that if the board is ever sued the document could be used against me, the board and the associatio­n in general. But the manager said I can’t sit on the board unless I sign this. What should I do?

Answer: The manager is wrong and lacks authority to demand your signature on that document, let alone to say you can’t sit on the board unless you sign. You should not sign that document and as a director you have a duty to attend meetings regardless.

The so-called code of ethics creates a very real potential for liability as articulate­d by your attorney because it could lead to a breach of fiduciary duty.

Fiduciary duty is the highest standard of duty the law imposes on a relationsh­ip because fiduciarie­s are responsibl­e for managing and maintainin­g other people’s assets and interests. This relationsh­ip is founded on the trust placed by one person in the integrity and fidelity of another. As such, fiduciary duties cannot be delegated.

This “code of ethics” gives the impression that the board’s only job is to agree unanimousl­y, which raises suspicion that all actions taken by the board are contrived in advance of meetings. That would be a violation of a board’s fiduciary obligation­s.

Meeting fiduciary obligation­s as a board requires due diligence, which means directors must show they conduct adequate investigat­ion of issues before them, leading to reasoned and principled decisions. Not following these procedures because of a prearrange­d agreement masked under a “code of ethics” could invalidate a directors and officers indemnity insurance.

Your fiduciary duty as an independen­t thinker acting in the best interests of the associatio­n includes acting reasonably and competentl­y using all available informatio­n.

That may mean that you as a director speak up and dissent from the majority

Directors who exercise reasonable judgment are protected by the business judgment rule from liability for claims of breach of fiduciary duty. When a director signs a pre-written document stating what he or she can and cannot do while performing duties as a fiduciary, the business judgment rule is unavailabl­e as a defense.

The associatio­n’s manager is a third-party vendor who was hired by the associatio­n to facilitate its operations at the direction of the board. Nothing about that relationsh­ip empowers the manager to determine who may sit on the board or under what circumstan­ces they may act.

All directors in your associatio­n who have already signed the “code of ethics” should immediatel­y disavow it, and the board should consider finding a new manager.

 ?? Westend61/Getty Images ?? AN ASSOCIATIO­N MANAGER lacks authority to demand a director’s signature on a “code of ethics.”
Westend61/Getty Images AN ASSOCIATIO­N MANAGER lacks authority to demand a director’s signature on a “code of ethics.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States