On the trail of the beguiling Joe Gould
Joe Gould’s Teeth Jill Lepore Knopf: 256 pp., $25
One winter, Jill Lepore, the historian and New Yorker correspondent, taught a course called “What Is Biography?” To coax her Harvard sophomores to ponder whether we can truly know another person, she assigned Julian Barnes’ novel “The Sense of an Ending.” She also gave them two famous New Yorker profiles by Joseph Mitchell: “the delightful, Pickwickian 1942 story ‘Professor Sea Gull,’ and the much longer and much darker, Poe-like 1964 tale ‘Joe Gould’s Secret.’ ”
So far, spot on. And then Lepore, in her trademark forensic way, began fact-checking the life of Joe Gould. Originally, Mitchell depicted him as a mesmerizing Greenwich Village character, a brilliant, blue-blooded raconteur cadging booze and ketchup meals, “restless and footloose as an alley cat.” Twenty-two years later, in a legendary, career-topping piece, Mitchell writes that he was duped.
It was a moving, gentlemanly confession. But “Joe Gould’s Secret” was also an elaborate defense of a pretty fable, one that Lepore calls “an act of deception.”
“Joe Gould was a toothless madman who slept in the street,” she reports in her frank and frankly unsettling new book, “Joe Gould’s Teeth.” Her first four sentences each have a separate footnote — this is nimble detective work.
The pint-sized, disheveled Gould spent years writing “The Oral History of Our Time,” an immense, ongoing record of his conversations and observations scribbled in dime-store composition notebooks, in ink stolen from post office inkwells. He wrote until his eyes gave out. In 1942, Mitchell estimated it ran some 9 million words.
“For a time, [Gould] was rather remarkably well known,” Lepore writes. “Chapters of his work appeared in avant-garde magazines nose to nose with essays by Virginia Woolf and drawings by Pablo Picasso. He went to parties with Langston Hughes. He dined with E.E. Cummings. He drank with John Dos Passos.”
Gould was catnip in this arty crowd, “the writer who could not stop writing,” a pet bohemian who “strutted along the streets of New York flapping like a seagull, ‘Screeeek! Scree-eek!’” If this behavior gave Gould his nickname and Mitchell a title, it gives the contemporary reader a jolt: autism may have lain beneath the spectacle.
For the literati, Gould peddled a seductive notion: He was compiling the history of the common man. “I am trying to present lyrical episodes of everyday life,” he wrote. “I would like to widen the sphere of history as Walt Whitman did that of poetry.”
Strange Joe Gould — subject of a painting by Alice Neel, who gave him three penises — explained, “My impulse to express life in terms of my own observation and reflection is so strong that I would continue to write if I were the sole survivor of the human race, and believed that my material would be seen by no other eyes than mine.”
Many may recognize this impulse. Occasionally it yields “Leaves of Grass.” Mostly, it yields drivel. But emphatically, it yields.
One permutation is the quantified-self movement — online tools that help people collect tides of data about themselves. Gould stands, at a slant, at the headwaters of this firehose of self-regard.
Which brings us to his teeth. Most likely, he lost them in 1929 at the Manhattan State Hospital for the Insane, when patients’ teeth were yanked routinely on the assumption that physical infection caused mental illness. Released back into the city at age 40, Gould was hired by editor Malcolm Cowley to write book reviews for the New Republic.
Still, Gould drank to excess and “bunked in flophouses and begged for handouts.” Seeking funds, he asked his literary buddies, “Are you plunderable?” Gould himself had been plundered of his teeth, and the New Yorker plundered his story — or more accurately, a version of his story. Gould complained to Mitchell, “I was only a figment of your imagination.”
Lepore is careful about the sticky ethics here, documenting how little research Mitchell did; he preferred just listening to Gould. When he returned posthumously to his subject, matters became even murkier. “Joe Gould’s Secret” reveals that Gould’s “The Oral History of Our Time” was a chimera.
Here is how Lepore thinks of it now: “Two writers guard an archive. One writes fiction; the other writes fact. To get past them, you have to figure out which is which. Joseph Mitchell said that Gould made things up. But Gould said that Mitchell did.”
Lepore ends her own book in a reverie.“It made a better story in 1942 if the Oral History existed,” Lepore writes. “It made a better story in 1964 if it did not.” She slips down the rabbit hole searching for it herself and discovers what she thinks was Gould’s actual secret: his racially tortured obsession with Augusta Savage, a Harlem Renaissance sculptor. Savage had rejected his marriage proposal, precipitating his first hospitalization. And quite terrifyingly, Gould stalked her; maybe worse.
Savage sculpted in Paris, returned to Harlem and, after the publication of “Professor Sea Gull,” decamped for upstate New York. Almost nothing remains of her work and her life. Lepore speculates she left the city to flee Gould.
“But — and here’s the trouble — from the moment I first learned about her, I knew that my likeliest error would be in thinking I understood Augusta Savage, as if she were me, when really, I hardly know her at all,” Lepore writes. This is one of her signature questions about the limits of biography.
And it is an eerie echo of Mitchell’s dilemma in appropriating Gould. “It has taken me a very long time,” Lepore writes, “my whole life, to learn that the asymmetry of the historical record isn’t always a consequence of people being silenced against their will. Some people don’t want to be remembered, or heard, or saved. They want to be left alone.”