Los Angeles Times

Deadly medical disaster slowly unfolds

The rise of a dangerous gene in bacteria could mean the end of the golden age of antibiotic­s.

- By Melissa Healy

BETHESDA, Md. — In early April, experts at a military lab outside Washington intensifie­d their search for evidence that a dangerous new biological threat had penetrated the nation’s borders.

They didn’t have to hunt long.

On May 18, a team working at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research here had its first look at a sample of the bacterium Escherichi­a coli taken from a 49-year-old woman in Pennsylvan­ia. She had a urinary tract infection with a disconcert­ing knack for surviving the assaults of antibiotic medication­s. Her sample was one of six from across the country delivered to the lab of microbiolo­gist Patrick McGann.

Within hours, a preliminar­y analysis deepened concern at the lab. Over the next several days, more sophistica­ted genetic sleuthing confirmed McGann’s worst fears.

There in the bacterium’s DNA was a gene dubbed mcr-1. Its presence made the pathogen impervious to the venerable antibiotic colistin.

More ominous, the gene’s presence on a plasmid — a tiny mobile loop of DNA that can be readily snapped off and attached to other bacteria — suggested that it could readily jump to other E. coli bacteria or to entirely different forms of diseasecau­sing organisms. That would make them impervi-

ous to colistin as well.

It was a milestone public health officials have been anticipati­ng for years. In a steady march, disease-causing microbes have evolved ways to evade the bulwark of medication­s used to treat bacterial infections. For a variety of those illnesses, only colistin continued to work every time. Now this last line of defense had been breached as well.

A second U.S. case of E. coli with the mcr-1 resistance gene was reported this week in the journal Antimicrob­ial Agents and Chemothera­py. Researcher­s are still working to determine whether it, or any of 18 other samples from around the world, contained the gene on an easy-to-spread plasmid.

The golden age of antibiotic­s appears to be coming to an end, its demise hastened by a combinatio­n of medical, social and economic factors. For decades, these drugs made it easy for doctors to treat infections and injuries. Now, common ailments are regaining the power to kill.

Harvard University infectious disease epidemiolo­gist William P. Hanage said that “we will not be flying back into the dark ages” overnight. Hospitals are improving their infection control, and public health experts are getting better at tracking new threats. But in a race against nature, he said, the humans are losing ground.

“We’re seeing more drugresist­ant infections,” Hanage said. “And people will die.”

A steady march

In 1928, British bacteriolo­gist Alexander Fleming discovered that an errant penicillin mold growing in one of his petri dishes had the power to kill staphyloco­ccus, a type of bacteria that causes pneumonia, skin infections and food poisoning. It took scientists, industrial­ists and the pressures of a world war to convert the mold into a mass-produced medicine, which was ready in time for troops to pack on D-day.

More than 100 antibiotic compounds have been introduced since. But almost as soon as they were given to patients, scientists began finding evidence that disease-causing bacteria were developing resistance to these new wonder drugs.

Bacteria meet, mate, compete and evolve inside living bodies. When an antibiotic is added to the mix, only the strongest survive.

Humans have accelerate­d this natural process by indiscrimi­nately prescribin­g antibiotic­s and by routinely feeding the drugs to livestock, scientists say. Multiply the number of humans and animals taking these drugs, and you multiply the opportunit­ies for antibiotic­resistant strains to emerge.

Until very recently, few made the connection between antibiotic use in individual cases and the emergence of antibiotic resistance, said Dr. Susan Bleasdale, an infection-control expert at the University of Illinois in Chicago. Patients with earaches, sinus pressure and sore throats demanded antibiotic­s, and physicians tended to oblige.

The results have been deadly. Each year, more than 2 million people in the U.S. are infected with a bacterium that has become resistant to one or more antibiotic medication designed to kill it, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. At least 23,000 people die as a direct result of antibiotic-resistant infections, and many more die from other conditions that were complicate­d by an antibiotic-resistant infection, the agency says.

As medicines such as tetracycli­ne, erythromyc­in and vancomycin lost much of their effectiven­ess, colistin continued to overwhelm trouble-making bacteria such as salmonella, klebsiella and E. coli.

Colistin is toxic to the human kidney, and doctors largely stopped using it in the 1970s when safer medication­s became available. But now that so many antibiotic­s have lost their ability to vanquish E. coli and other bacterial invaders, colistin has become the only hope for some desperate patients.

The slow, steady march of antibiotic resistance doesn’t cause people to bleed to death in the streets, the way the Ebola virus does. It doesn’t cause heart-rending birth defects, as the Zika virus does.

And it rarely makes headlines. A survey released in June by the Infectious Diseases Society of America found that only 30% of Americans believe that antibiotic resistance is a significan­t problem for public health.

Yet officials at the World Health Organizati­on warn that gonorrhea “may soon become untreatabl­e” because of growing resistance to the antibiotic ceftriaxon­e, a member of the cephalospo­rin class. The WHO also notes that extensivel­y drugresist­ant tuberculos­is is now circulatin­g in 100 countries, and that worldwide resistance to carbapenem antibiotic­s has weakened physicians’ last line of attack against life-threatenin­g intestinal enterobact­eriaceae infections.

“It’s a slow catastroph­e,” said Army Col. Emil Lesho, director of the Defense Department’s Multidrug-resistant Organism Repository and Surveillan­ce Network.

The problem goes beyond treating infections. As bacterial resistance grows, Lesho said, “we’re all at risk of losing our access” to medical miracles we’ve come to take for granted: elective surgeries, joint replacemen­ts, organ transplant­s, cancer chemothera­pies. These treatments give bacteria an opportunit­y to hitch a ride on a catheter or an unwashed hand and invade an already vulnerable patient.

The struggle to sustain the effectiven­ess of antibiotic­s is a never-ending arms race. If humankind were regularly finding new antimicrob­ial agents and turning them into medicines, there might be less cause for worry.

Researcher­s haven’t identified a new class of antibiotic medication since 1987. As a result, though bacteria have continuous­ly evolved new ways to thwart antibiotic­s, the medicines have not gained new mechanisms to fight back.

The economics of drug developmen­t are partly to blame.

To offset the millions of dollars they pour into research, clinical trials and the Food and Drug Administra­tion approval process, pharmaceut­ical companies aim to develop blockbuste­r drugs, said Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. An ideal candidate would be used by millions of people every day for the rest of their lives, like pills to keep cholestero­l or blood pressure in check.

Antibiotic­s won’t pay the freight. They should be prescribed sparingly and used only for about a week. They could be rendered obsolete at any time by resistance genes. Worst of all, they compete in a field of inexpensiv­e generics.

Without government policies that encourage investment in the antibiotic­s, “there’s very little incentive” for companies to do it themselves, Fauci said.

Other approaches can help. Under Fauci, his institute is funding the developmen­t of tests that would speed the diagnosis of infections and prompt more careful use of antibiotic­s by physicians and hospitals.

New vaccines to prevent bacterial infections are under study, and existing vaccines could be more widely used. The use of bacteria-killing viruses — an approach called phage therapy that revives an idea largely abandoned in the 1930s — is getting a second look.

A spreading gene

The Pennsylvan­ia patient whose infection was impervious to colistin was able to beat back the bacteria in her urinary tract with the help of other antibiotic­s. She survived.

Others have not been so lucky. Hospital patients infected by antibiotic-resistant bacteria are twice as likely to die as those infected by the nonresista­nt strains of the same bacteria, studies show.

Experts say it’s just a matter of time before other disease-causing bacteria pick up the fateful mcr-1 gene. Since its discovery was reported in China in November 2015, it has spread to human, animal, food and environmen­tal bacteria on every continent.

“It’s not apocalypti­c until it is,” said Peter Pitts, president of the Center for Medicine in the Public Interest and former associate commission­er of the FDA. “Shame on us if we wait till bodies are in the street.”

 ?? Walter Reed Army Institute of Research ?? ROSSLYN MAYBACK was part of a team at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in Bethesda, Md., that identified a strain of Escherichi­a coli bacteria with a gene that could spread antibiotic resistance.
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research ROSSLYN MAYBACK was part of a team at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in Bethesda, Md., that identified a strain of Escherichi­a coli bacteria with a gene that could spread antibiotic resistance.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States