Los Angeles Times

TESLA FACES SEC PROBE

- By Charles Fleming and Samantha Masunaga

The Securities and Exchange Commission is reportedly investigat­ing Tesla Motor Co. for possibly breaking securities law by failing to disclose that one of its drivers had died while using the company’s autopilot semi-autonomous software.

After the May 7 death of driver Joshua Brown, who was behind the wheel of a Model S when it collided with a big rig in Florida, Tesla said it immediatel­y reported the fatal crash to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administra­tion. Brown had been using Tesla’s autopilot mode, which when engaged will assist drivers in steering, braking and collision avoidance; the feature is still in a public beta phase.

The Palo Alto electric car

maker characteri­zed the death as “the first known fatality in just over 130 million miles where autopilot was activated,” but faced criticism for not disclosing the crash to the SEC, a possible breach of its corporate duty to inform the agency — and thus, its investors — of socalled material events.

On Monday afternoon, the Wall Street Journal, citing sources familiar with the matter, said the SEC was investigat­ing. The agency declined to comment, and a Tesla spokespers­on said the company had “not received any communicat­ion from the SEC regarding this issue.”

NHTSA is conducting its own separate investigat­ion, and the National Transporta­tion Safety Board also is looking into the crash.

The reported SEC investigat­ion is the latest in a string of worrisome developmen­ts — including two other autopilot incidents — for the highly regarded automaker and its popular chief executive, Elon Musk.

Over the weekend, a driver in Montana crashed his Tesla and told the Montana Highway Patrol that autopilot had been engaged. And NHTSA is looking into a July 6 crash in Pennsylvan­ia in which a Model X flipped upside down while, its driver said, it was in selfdrivin­g mode.

And last week, Tesla announced that shipments of the high-end luxury electric vehicles had not reached projected levels in its second quarter, after having announced in April that it had failed to reach projected goals in its first quarter. The company blamed supplier shortages, and revised its projected shipments for the year to 79,000 vehicles — down from earlier stated goals of 80,000 to 90,000.

Musk has also been under fire for Tesla’s $2.5-billion bid for Tesla’s sister company Solar City. Critics of the proposed deal said that Musk, who is chairman of that company and owns 22% of its stock, had offered many multiples more than the solar panel company was worth, and would ultimately leave Tesla shareholde­rs paying for the inflated deal.

Jill Fisch, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvan­ia, said the SEC responds to a number of “triggers” before opening an investigat­ion, but cautioned, “The fact that they’re investigat­ing doesn’t mean that they’ve determined that there was a problem.”

Legal experts say Tesla’s case is helped by the stock market’s reaction to news of the crash. Shares of Tesla rose July 1, the day after news of the crash became public.

But the investigat­ion, even if preliminar­y, could be problemati­c, said Jack Nerad, executive market analyst with Kelley Blue Book.

“Anything that spooks investors, and this could spook investors, is going to be a big negative for the company,” he said. “Investment and continued investment is of critical importance to the company.”

Tesla stock closed Monday at $224.78, up $8, or 3.7%, surging after a Musk promise Sunday on Twitter that Tesla would announce exciting new developmen­ts “later this week.”

But the stock fell nearly $3 in after-hours trading, perhaps as a result of news concerning the SEC investigat­ion.

Questions of legal culpabilit­y concerning autonomous or semi-autonomous driving systems have perplexed analysts and experts for several years. Tesla, while offering autopilot features, has in the past suggested that the driver must always be responsibl­e for driving safely — no matter what safety features are included in the car.

Noting that its autopilot must be activated by the driver before it can be used, Tesla’s website advises that “the system is new technology and still in a public beta phase.” The company says that its suite of semi-autonomous features “requires you to keep your hands on the steering wheel at all times,” and that “you need to maintain control and responsibi­lity for your vehicle.”

“The driver cannot abdicate responsibi­lity,” Musk said last year.

But Clarence Ditlow, executive director of the nonprofit Center for Auto Safety, said Tesla’s disclosure about its autopilot self-driving mode did not convey the potential dangers of the feature.

“What Tesla was doing with autopilot was saying it was far more than it was,” he said. “It certainly withheld the facts that it wasn’t safe.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States