Los Angeles Times

Water saving wanes under relaxed rules

- MATT STEVENS matt.stevens@latimes.com

Water conservati­on in California dipped slightly during the first month that the state’s mandatory water-savings rules were significan­tly relaxed, regulators said Tuesday.

The 21.5% cut in water use in June compared with the same month in 2013 was less impressive than some officials had hoped, but also came as a relief because the numbers suggest that urban California­ns will continue to save water — even when they are not required to do so.

June marked the first time in a year that many of the state’s more than 400 local water agencies were not under orders to cut their consumptio­n by a certain percentage. Under the latest set of emergency drought rules, water districts were given the power to “self-certify” that they have enough supply to meet future demand and set their own savings targets.

Many districts have already submitted calculatio­ns showing that they pass the state’s so called stress test and therefore can do away with mandatory water conservati­on.

At Tuesday’s State Water Resources Control Board meeting, some speculated that the relaxed regulation­s may have caused conservati­on efforts to flag in June. Water board staff members noted that urban California­ns had cut their water consumptio­n 27.5% in June 2015, a more significan­t savings than in June of this year.

“California­ns have continued to conserve without top-down mandates, but the question is whether we can save enough and keep it up for the long haul,” said water board Chairwoman Felicia Marcus. “Some relaxation of conservati­on in light of the relief we got last winter and other supply conditions is appropriat­e and expected; abandonmen­t of conservati­on is not.”

David Bolland, special projects manager for the Assn. of California Water Agencies, which represents hundreds of the state’s local water districts, acknowledg­ed that June data showed a relative increase in water use. But he emphasized that the numbers also show that “California­ns have really gotten the message” and have made saving water a matter of habit.

Gov. Jerry Brown ordered mandatory statewide water conservati­on more than a year ago as a way to blunt the impacts of California’s multiyear drought. For nine months local water districts were instructed to cut their water consumptio­n by varying amounts or face fines. Then the board revised the rules and reduced many of those conservati­on targets.

In May, the board revised the rules again, and, recognizin­g that winter rains had helped the state’s hydrology, gave water districts the power to discard mandatory water conservati­on altogether if they could prove that they have enough supply to meet their customers’ current and future water needs.

Subsequent­ly, suppliers such as the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Long Beach Water Department and Coachella Valley Water District set their conservati­on targets at 0%.

In an interview last week, Tim Quinn, executive director of the Assn. of California Water Agencies, emphasized that water providers that set their targets at 0% can do so only because they are well-prepared to cope with a prolonged water shortage.

A 0% conservati­on standard, he said, signifies that a water district has passed the state’s stress test “with flying colors,” but some members of the public may incorrectl­y assume that the 0% conservati­on target means their water district no longer cares about conservati­on.

“Calculatin­g a zero … means you’re droughtpre­pared because of the action you and your community has taken,” Quinn said. “That’s a good thing, not a bad thing.”

Water board staff members said Tuesday that they were still reviewing the piles of paperwork submitted by water districts and hoped to provide an update by the middle of August. That update could include a list of all of the water suppliers and their self-certified conservati­on standards.

Many of those standards are expected to be 0%. But on Tuesday, staff members also said that 31 suppliers have not submitted their paperwork and would therefore retain their current targets. Officials did not specify which suppliers were among the tardy 31.

The current state regulation­s expire at the end of January.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States