Los Angeles Times

L.A.’s $200-million mistake

For three decades, the city failed to ensure that subsidized housing was accessible to the disabled.

-

For years, advocates complained to Los Angeles City Hall that publicly-funded housing developmen­ts for low-income tenants were being built without the required accommodat­ions for residents with disabiliti­es. Entryways were too narrow to fit wheelchair­s, doors were too heavy and kitchen counters were too high to reach. But their complaints were largely ignored until three nonprofit groups that serve the disabled sued the city in 2012.

Now — just as Mayor Eric Garcetti and the City Council are attempting to raise millions of dollars to ramp up constructi­on of subsidized housing — the city has agreed to a $200 million settlement in the case, promising to provide 4,000 apartments for low-income people who require wheelchair­s, have hearing impairment­s or live with other disabiliti­es. It’s expensive, but it’s only fair.

When developers receive federal money, they are required by law to ensure that at least 5% of the units are designed for people with disabiliti­es, meaning the rooms must be large enough for a wheelchair to maneuver and sinks and counters must be low enough to be accessible, among other things. The city then is required to guarantee that the buildings meet the federal government’s accessibil­ity requiremen­ts before issuing a certificat­e of occupancy.

But too often the apartments advertised as designed for disabled residents were not actually accessible, advocates said. That left low-income disabled tenants with few housing options and at greater risk of ending up homeless or in nursing homes.

It shouldn’t take a lawsuit to force the city to follow the law. But when it comes to the disabled, that’s what has happened too often. Last year, Garcetti and the Council agreed to spend $1.3 billion over 30 years on repairs to settle to settle a class-action lawsuit brought by disabled residents who were unable to use the city’s broken sidewalks. It’s only fair that the city, which signed off on the flawed apartments, must now take responsibi­lity for working with developers to fix the problem. The city can meet the target of 4,000 units by helping fund new apartment constructi­on, renovating existing apartments or demonstrat­ing that they do meet the federal standards. The agreement also requires that any housing project that receives city funds over the next 10 years will design 10% of the apartments for disabled residents — double the current requiremen­t. But just as important, the settlement forces the city to enact safeguards to ensure that such costly mistakes don’t happen again.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States