Los Angeles Times

Early clues in SpaceX blast

Root cause of the incident before launch is still undetermin­ed.

- By Samantha Masunaga samantha.masunaga@latimes.com Twitter: @smasunaga

Analysis of debris and data suggests that a “large breach” took place in the cryogenic helium system.

Early analysis of debris and data from SpaceX’s launch pad explosion suggests that a “large breach” took place in the cryogenic helium system of the rocket’s second-stage liquid oxygen tank, the space company said Friday.

The Hawthorne space company said it still has not determined the root of the incident and that all “plausible causes” are being investigat­ed.

“We will work to resume our manifest as quickly as responsibl­e once the cause of the anomaly has been identified by the Accident Investigat­ion Team,” SpaceX said in a statement on its website. “Pending the results of the investigat­ion, we anticipate returning to flight as early as the November timeframe.”

SpaceX said it has ruled out any connection between the explosion three weeks ago and the June 2015 disintegra­tion of a rocket laden with supplies for the Internatio­nal Space Station, an incident that was blamed on a failed strut assembly in the Falcon 9’s second stage that was holding down a helium tank.

But the news Friday means the company should take a careful look at the second stage of its rockets, said Marco Caceres, senior space analyst at Teal Group, an aerospace and defense market research firm.

“There’s a pattern,” he said. “It wasn’t the same thing, but there’s a pattern of things going wrong with a certain part of your rocket.”

The fiery failure that occurred at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida is being investigat­ed by SpaceX, with participat­ion from NASA, the U.S. Air Force and other industry experts. It is being overseen by the Federal Aviation Administra­tion.

“Getting back to flight safely and reliably is our top priority,” SpaceX said on its website. “The data gathered from the present investigat­ion will result in an even safer and more reliable vehicle for our customers and partners.”

SpaceX has said its launch schedule is filled with 70 missions worth more than $10 billion.

The explosion destroyed a Falcon 9 rocket and a communicat­ions satellite set to launch Sept. 3. SpaceX said the incident occurred while the rocket was being fueled ahead of a routine prelaunch static test fire.

Two weeks ago, company Chief Executive Elon Musk described the launch pad explosion in a tweet as “the most difficult and complex failure” the company has ever had. He said at the time that the rocket’s engines were not on.

On Friday, SpaceX said inspection­s of the company’s Space Launch Complex 40, where the explosion occurred, show that “substantia­l areas” of the launch pad were affected.

However, the Falcon support building adjacent to the pad, as well as the tanks and plumbing that hold the super-chilled liquid oxygen and kerosene fuel farm were “unaffected.”

The launch pad’s control systems were also found to be in “relatively good condition,” SpaceX said.

The state of the launch pad is good news for the company since important systems weren’t affected, Caceres said.

SpaceX said the modificati­ons to its alternate launch pad at Cape Canaveral are still set to finish in November, and Caceres said he expected the company to launch from there.

 ?? NASA ?? A BREACH appears to have occurred in the cryogenic helium system in the rocket’s second stage, SpaceX says. Above, the second-stage engine of a rocket in 2014.
NASA A BREACH appears to have occurred in the cryogenic helium system in the rocket’s second stage, SpaceX says. Above, the second-stage engine of a rocket in 2014.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States