Los Angeles Times

School calls to police faulted

ACLU cites ill effects of summoning cops for once routinely handled discipline.

- By Anna M. Phillips

Many California school districts offer their staff little or no guidance on when police should be called to control student behavior, according to a study that comes as districts face increased pressure to redefine law enforcemen­t’s role in public schools.

The report, released Wednesday by the American Civil Liberties Union, analyzed law enforcemen­t policies of 119 California school districts, including 50 of its most populous. It found that more than half the districts — large and small — gave their staff broad discretion to summon police officers for small infraction­s, bullying and disrupting lessons.

After the police are called in (most districts don’t permanentl­y station officers in their schools), many districts do little to shield their students from potential consequenc­es, the study found. Of those analyzed, about 98% don’t require parental notificati­on before a student is interviewe­d by police and about 99% don’t mandate that officers advise students who haven’t yet been arrested of their constituti­onal rights, including the right to remain silent.

The result, according to the study’s authors, is that school administra­tors often outsource what used to be routine in-school discipline to police officers. And when they do, the effects are disproport­ionately harsh for poor, minority and disabled students, who are more likely to be arrested than their peers.

During the 2013-14 school year, 9,540 school-related arrests were made in California, according to the study. Black students were three times as likely as white students to be charged with an

offense.

“Too often, school staff call the police to have them handle a situation that makes a student end up having to go to court or get a fine,” said ACLU staff attorney Victor Leung. “Really, they should have no discretion — the rule should be that they handle this minor rule-breaking with their own staff.”

In California, 19 school districts have their own police forces, ranging in size from four officers in Apple Valley Unified to 410 sworn officers and 101 school safety officers in Los Angeles. Most districts have memorandum­s of understand­ing with local law enforcemen­t, but many of these documents contain “deficient, vague, or even non-existent policies,” according to the report.

The worst offenders, Leung said, are the 33% of school districts that require staff to report low-level offenses such as vandalism or graffiti to police. Although these may sound like welldefine­d criminal acts, in practice, their meaning has been interprete­d to include doodling on a desk or drawing one’s name on a locker.

In 2011, the East Side Union High School District in San Jose called police on an autistic seventh-grader who had carved his initials into the sidewalk outside his school. He was cited for vandalism, a charge that appeared on his criminal record. In response, Supt. Chris Funk told an NBC affiliate that East Side Union was hiring more social workers and counselors.

“I think what happened was because of zero-tolerance policies, there was a period of time where people just went to the police and had students cited for everything,” Funk said.

Model school districts include San Francisco, Oakland and Pasadena, the latter of which has an agreement with local law enforcemen­t that forbids police officers from responding to calls of discipline problems and says school administra­tors are responsibl­e for handling misbehavio­r.

Los Angeles Unified School District receives some kudos for its policy requiring police officers to have a warrant or court order before removing a student for questionin­g. But the report notes, disapprovi­ngly, that the district continues to require school staff to screen middle and high school students randomly and daily, using a metal detector wand.

“While the policy expressly states that police should not conduct the searches, the ACLU’s review of the district’s search logs revealed that police frequently perform the searches,” the report says. “This policy has led to the unnecessar­y criminaliz­ation of students who possess minor contraband or do not wish to comply with the searches.”

A spokeswoma­n for the L.A. school police chief said he was unavailabl­e to comment.

The report recommends that school districts refer matters to the police only when there is an immediate physical threat to anyone on campus. Even drug and alcohol use should be handled by school staff, it says.

It also urges districts equipped with police forces not to permanentl­y place officers in schools.

 ?? Irfan Khan Los Angeles Times ?? AN ACLU report found many school districts in California don’t offer guidance to staff on when to call police. Above, L.A. school police officers at a briefing in 2015.
Irfan Khan Los Angeles Times AN ACLU report found many school districts in California don’t offer guidance to staff on when to call police. Above, L.A. school police officers at a briefing in 2015.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States