Los Angeles Times

More Wells Fargo issues raised

Two U.S. senators ask how much the bank’s new CEO knew about accounts scandal.

- By Jim Puzzangher­a

WASHINGTON — Two U.S. senators are pressing Wells Fargo & Co. about how much new Chief Executive Timothy Sloan knew about the unauthoriz­ed-accounts scandal that led to his appointmen­t.

Elizabeth Warren (DMass.) and Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), outspoken critics of Wells Fargo, also want to know more about how much money former Chief Executive John Stumpf will get after resigning last week in the wake of the controvers­y.

“Given the scope of wrongdoing on his watch, Mr. Stumpf ’s resignatio­n is entirely appropriat­e,” the senators wrote in a letter Thursday to Stephen Sanger, who is the new chairman of Wells Fargo’s board of directors.

“But a resignatio­n alone is not enough to assure proper accountabi­lity at Wells Fargo,” they said. “Instead, it raises additional questions.”

The letter is another signal that Stumpf’s resignatio­n didn’t end the problems stemming from the revelation­s last month in a $185million settlement with Los Angeles City Atty. Mike Feuer and federal regulators that bank employees created as many as 2 million accounts without customer authorizat­ion.

The California Justice Department is investigat­ing

allegation­s of criminal identity theft in the creation of the accounts, according to a search warrant and related documents sent to Wells Fargo that were obtained this week by the Los Angeles Times through a public records request.

U.S. attorneys in San Francisco, New York and Charlotte, N.C., also have opened investigat­ions, as have two congressio­nal committees.

And lawmakers continue to pound Wells Fargo.

On Tuesday, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Los Angeles) wrote to the Office of the Comptrolle­r of the Currency requesting more informatio­n about the bank’s compliance with the Community Reinvestme­nt Act.

Wells Fargo also has yet to respond to questions put to the bank last month by Warren, Menendez and other Democratic members of the Senate Banking Committee.

Warren and Menendez in their new request Thursday asked how the board decided to choose Sloan, a longtime Wells Fargo executive; whether he was questioned about his knowledge of the creation of unauthoriz­ed customer accounts; and any actions he might have taken in response.

In announcing Sloan’s promotion Oct. 12, Wells Fargo said he had been with the bank for 29 years and “knows Wells Fargo’s operations deeply,” but that was unsettling to the senators.

“It is difficult to believe that he had no knowledge of or bears no responsibi­lity for the actions of thousands of Wells Fargo employees creating fake accounts under his and other top executives’ watch,” Warren and Menendez wrote.

Sloan, who became president and chief operating officer in November, has said he was aware of the scandal as early as late 2013, when a Los Angeles Times investigat­ion first publicly revealed the problems.

In a statement, the board’s independen­t directors said Thursday they have “great confidence in Tim Sloan’s leadership.”

“We appreciate the senators’ concerns, take these issues seriously and are deeply concerned about what has come to light,” the directors said, noting they had previously announced the board was conducting an independen­t investigat­ion of the unauthoriz­ed accounts matter.

“The company has taken immediate initial actions to make our customers whole, to understand the full extent of the problems and to fix them, to hold executives accountabl­e through compensati­on actions and to begin to restore the trust our customers have placed in our institutio­n for 164 years,” the board said.

The senators also raised questions about Stumpf’s retirement compensati­on.

Stumpf will not receive any severance, according to public filings. But he will retain more than $100 million in vested stock, plus accumulate­d pension and 401(k) benefits exceeding $24 million, despite the loss of other significan­t compensati­on, the filings said.

Stumpf forfeited about $41 million in unvested stock awards and eligibilit­y for an annual bonus, which had totaled $4 million for several years.

But Warren and Menendez asked whether the board would attempt to claw back more of Stump’s compensati­on and if he would “serve as a ‘consultant’ or in any other capacity for Wells Fargo or the board.”

The senators requested answers to their questions by Oct. 27 and a briefing by Nov. 3.

Bank spokesman Mark Folk said Wednesday the bank is “working to respond to the inquiries we’ve received from senators and members of Congress.”

 ?? European Pressphoto Agency ?? SEN. ELIZABETH Warren is an outspoken critic of Wells Fargo.
European Pressphoto Agency SEN. ELIZABETH Warren is an outspoken critic of Wells Fargo.
 ?? CQ-Roll Call Inc. ?? SEN. ROBERT Menendez and Warren want answers by Oct. 27.
CQ-Roll Call Inc. SEN. ROBERT Menendez and Warren want answers by Oct. 27.
 ?? Spencer Platt ?? THE SENATORS’ letter is another sign Wells Fargo’s management shake-up didn’t end its problems.
Spencer Platt THE SENATORS’ letter is another sign Wells Fargo’s management shake-up didn’t end its problems.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States