Los Angeles Times

Twitter to cut jobs, kill off Vine app

Firm’s moves to turn a profit follow 9 straight quarters of slowing revenue growth.

- By Paresh Dave paresh.dave@latimes.com

The company will slash 9% of its workforce as it retrenches in hopes of producing an annual profit for the first time next year.

When a slew of photo and video apps popped up about five years ago, Twitter Inc. pounced.

Larger rival Facebook reportedly outbid it by hundreds of millions of dollars for rapidly growing Instagram, but Twitter managed to grab the yet-to-launch Vine app for a few million dollars in stock and cash.

What’s transpired since then, culminatin­g Thursday with a disclosure that Twitter would shut down Vine and lay off more than 300 employees, points to the unrealized potential that’s squeezed the San Francisco company into a corner.

Twitter has produced nine straight quarters of slowing revenue growth compared with the prioryear quarter. The number of monthly active users, the firm’s key usage measuremen­t, has stagnated for the last year. Several other firms, including Salesforce.com Inc. and Walt Disney Co., have considered and then rejected the opportunit­y to acquire Twitter in recent weeks.

Now, the company is retrenchin­g in hopes of producing an annual profit for the first time next year.

“Once a company gets to our scale and growth, it’s important to drive toward margins and profitabil­ity,” Chief Financial Officer Anthony Noto said during a call with analysts. “It’s an important milestone to reach for investor appeal.”

Twitter vowed to help users preserve existing posts on Vine, but is stopping further developmen­t, which could free employees to work on live-video technology. It declined to say how many layoffs would be associated with Vine, which many employees had already left.

Four years ago, Facebook and Twitter allowed their respective image-sharing acquisitio­ns to operate independen­tly. Vine turned out to be popular once it launched. A tool to produce and view six-second videos that repeated endlessly, Vine resulted in something unlike anything else in the App Store.

Comedians got creative, and the results generated millions of views. Onlineborn celebritie­s shared quick bites from their lives to millions of followers. Sports fans loved short highlights that cut straight to the pivotal moment. In December, the National Basketball Assn. became the first organizati­on to reach 1 billion views on Vine.

But Vine’s limitation­s turned off most consumers and advertiser­s, some of whom found YouTube, Snapchat and Instagram simpler and more lucrative.

“To me, Vine was always a bit too quirky for mass user appeal,” said Debra Aho Williamson, principal analyst at advertisin­g industry research firm EMarketer. “With so many other places to put digital video advertisin­g, Vine just didn’t take root for marketers.”

Facebook also kept bolstering editing options, including video filters and text animations; Vine hasn’t strayed far from its original version.

The percentage of people in the U.S. using Vine in one 7Park Data research panel has dipped below 1% from a peak of near 4% two years ago, while Instagram commands about 30%, up from about 21%.

The fall came as Twitter endured widespread executive departures and shifting management strategies that technology analysts say slowed innovation.

But to the early Vine investor who introduced the app to Twitter co-founder and current CEO Jack Dorsey, that’s an unfair narrative.

“Not every merger or acquisitio­n is Instagram or YouTube,” former SV Angel investor David Lee said. “If you look at the Twittersph­ere today, it’s clear [Vine’s three co-founders] built something that resonated with people, and not a lot of people can say they did that.”

Still, the Vine trio — all of whom had left or were fired by this year — griped Thursday about what could have been. Dom Hofmann posted on Twitter that he was “busting out the bourbon.” Rus Yusupov warned “Don’t sell your company!” Colin Kroll linked to an old Vine post featuring a fiery explosion and sorry note.

Twitter said it would cut 9% of its 3,900 employees, mostly in sales and marketing as teams separately addressing large and midsize clients merge. After an initial hit of $10 million to $20 million in severance costs, the layoffs could bring as much as $100 million in annual savings, according to one estimate.

But that’s not enough, Wedbush Securities financial analyst Michael Pachter said. Twitter’s usage of stock to pay employees remains “excessive,” he said.

User interface changes and initiative­s such as streaming live video of NFL games are helping boost ad sales at Twitter, but not quickly enough to justify its valuation, said RBC Capital Markets analyst Mark Mahaney. Twitter shares closed Thursday at $17.40, up 11 cents, but well below the initial issue price of $26 when the company went public nearly three years ago.

“Twitter believes it can command premium ad pricing, but its dramatic ad [revenue] decelerati­on doesn’t support that,” Mahaney wrote in a note Thursday.

Since returning a year ago to the helm, Dorsey has focused on design adjustment­s in hopes of encouragin­g more activity. Some of the changes, such as automatica­lly surfacing the most interestin­g posts people might have missed between visits to the app, have been welcomed by many of its 317 million monthly users.

Twitter reported thirdquart­er revenue of $616 million, up 8% from a year earlier, and a loss of $103 million.

Analysts say that the company remains a takeover target, with an acquisitio­n inevitable if the share price further tumbles.

Dorsey declined to address the acquisitio­n discussion­s beyond saying the company’s board of directors is committed to maximizing long-term value.

With those discussion­s in the rearview mirror and budget cuts in progress, questions about Twitter now may shift to the company’s spending on the rights to stream NFL games, political events, news shows and other video.

Twitter executives said they’re trying to make each content deal profitable on its own, but it’s unclear whether that’s achievable as apps fight for exclusive rights to prized programmin­g and drive up prices.

Noto described live video as integral to the future, noting there was record usage during the three days Twitter streamed election debates. Videos also have been Twitter’s largest and fastestgro­wing ad-revenue generator in recent months.

“We would need to have debate every day on Twitter to have it be a meaningful impact across a quarter, and that’s where we are headed,” Noto said.

Additional tweaks to the service are coming. Dorsey said November would bring updates to the way Twitter handles concerns about harassment, bullying and other unwanted interactio­n between users. He didn’t go into detail about those changes or about expected experiment­ation with the app’s posting process.

Although Twitter has not enacted the revolution­ary changes some technology analysts have called for, the company’s adjusted profit margins have shown improvemen­t through the spate of smaller refinement­s.

 ?? Jeff Chiu Associated Press ??
Jeff Chiu Associated Press
 ?? Richard Drew Associated Press ?? TWITTER posted third-quarter revenue of $616 million, up 8% from a year earlier, and a loss of $103 million. Above, its logo at the New York Stock Exchange.
Richard Drew Associated Press TWITTER posted third-quarter revenue of $616 million, up 8% from a year earlier, and a loss of $103 million. Above, its logo at the New York Stock Exchange.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States