Los Angeles Times

Long Beach won’t allow internatio­nal flights

City shelves proposal to build a facility sought by JetBlue.

- By Dan Weikel

After almost two years of study and discussion, Long Beach lawmakers on Tuesday night killed a proposal to add internatio­nal flights to Latin America at the city’s commercial airport.

Following several hours of public comment, the City Council voted 8 to 1 against the idea, which was initiated in 2015 when JetBlue Airways, the airport’s biggest carrier, requested a study to determine whether internatio­nal flights were feasible at Long Beach Airport.

The vote halted a proposal to build a federal inspection station, which would have provided customs and immigratio­n services for internatio­nal travelers.

Councilwom­an Stacy Mungo, whose district includes the airport and surroundin­g neighborho­ods, stopped any future work on the proposal by making a motion to shelve a staff recommenda­tion to move forward with the inspection station.

Mungo said the federal facility, estimated to cost $10 million to $21 million, would divert funds away from other airport projects, and she did not believe the economic benefits outweighed the impact on residents.

Councilwom­an Suzie Price seconded the motion, saying that many residents have expressed concerns and fear about the adverse effects of adding internatio­nal flights.

Critics of the plan contend that the proposal would lead to more traffic, air pollution, a drop in property values and pressure to lift the city’s restrictiv­e noise limits. Before the council voted, scores of people spoke out against the flights during more than two hours of public testimony.

“We have a wonderful air-

port in Long Beach,” said Councilman Roberto Uranga, who voted for Mungo’s motion. “Having a customs facility, however, just did not add up economical­ly. Not pursuing a federal inspection facility offers other opportunit­ies to strengthen the airport and continue to make it our economic engine.”

Long Beach Airport handles about 3 million passengers a year and offers only domestic flights. It operates under a noise ordinance that allows about 50 commercial flights per day.

JetBlue, which is based in New York, has been interested in flying to vacation spots in Mexico and other Latin American destinatio­ns.

Rob Land, an associate general counsel and senior vice president of government affairs at JetBlue, said airline officials are “profoundly disappoint­ed” after years of delay and a city study that validated the safety, security and economic benefits of adding internatio­nal flights.

“JetBlue will evaluate its future plans for Long Beach, the Greater Los Angeles area and California,” Land said.

The demand for internatio­nal flights in Southern California has grown 30% from 2010 to 2015, according to a $347,000 feasibilit­y study by Pasadena-based Jacobs Engineerin­g.

Researcher­s concluded that the demand is strong enough to convert up to eight domestic flights from Long Beach Airport to internatio­nal flights within five years.

The Jacobs study stated that the federal facility, which it projected to cost $17 million to $21 million, could be paid for by JetBlue, other airlines that would use it and fees collected from internatio­nal passengers. Airport officials estimated that a 15,000-square-foot facility would cost about $10 million.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States