Catchy words can backfire on president

WASHINGTON — Of all his political gifts, President Trump’s knack for branding his ideas and his opponents with unforgettable slogans and monikers may be the one that inspires the most awe from allies and adversaries.

But the legal and political fight over Trump’s travel ban on seven Muslim-majority countries demonstrates the potential downside to his flair for making his ideas stick in the public imagination. Even as allies insist he is not instituting a “Muslim ban,” Trump’s own attempts to sell the policy as just that may prove its undoing.

Unlike conventional politicians, who use careful language to leave themselves room to slip and slide away from their promises, Trump employs the type of sizzling sales pitches he learned in real estate and media.

“A typical White House doesn’t need to finesse because they have a president who understands that technique already,” said Frank Luntz, who has advised Republicans on using rhetoric to frame debates. “Finesse and Donald Trump are not two words you use in the same sentence. But you always have to put in the ‘but.’ This has worked for him.”

Trump’s sloganeering remains a valuable tool for rallying support for his ideas. But as the late Mario Cuomo might have said, Trump is fast learning what it’s like to campaign in marketing and govern in prose.

All presidents face that reality, usually when they balance campaign promises against the realities of complicated policy, bureaucratic resistance and Congress. But for Trump, who once vowed to fulfill “every dream you’ve ever dreamed,” the drop-off could be steeper.

The Affordable Care Act was not just a bad idea to Trump. It was a “disaster,” a “catastrophe,” that if not repealed and replaced “will destroy American healthcare forever.”

Despite the urgency he conveyed on the campaign trail, Trump said this week that it may take another year to replace Obamacare.

Almost everyone has heard the call-and-response climax of a Trump campaign rally. “We’re going to build the wall,” he says. And who’s going to pay for the wall? “Mexico!” the crowd roars.

But Trump has yet to outline specifics on how to compel Mexico to pay for it. He is asking Congress to at least initially pay for a wall, which Homeland Security Secretary John F. Kelly described Tuesday as partial.

Trump has also backed off his pledge to prosecute election opponent Hillary Clinton, whom he had branded as “crooked Hillary,” and continues to heap praise on President Obama, whose birth certificate he long questioned as “a fraud.”

Yet it’s the travel ban on immigration that faces the most immediate test.

Trump first proposed a temporary “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States” in December 2015. Since then, he has adopted the media shorthand of “ban.”

The final executive order, issued a week after Trump’s inauguration, fell short of a full Muslim ban, suspending entrance for asylum seekers from around the world as well as inbound travel for citizens of Syria, Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Yemen and Somalia.

Before signing it, Trump said in a radio interview that Christians fleeing persecution from Syria would get preferential treatment once refugees are allowed in, adding to the sense that he was initiating a religious test.

Once opponents began filing legal challenges that attacked the order as religious discrimination, White House aides began distancing themselves from the word “ban.”

Press Secretary Sean Spicer chided the media for using the term, insisting Trump was only using it because the media was — a contorted explanation that inspired a biting sketch on “Saturday Night Live.”

By the time Trump advisor Kellyanne Conway appeared on CNN on Tuesday just before crucial appellate arguments, she had sterilized the order to “extreme vetting from seven narrowly prescribed countries in a very temporary way.”

Selling a major policy in such clinical terms is never easy. But it might have been easier to recast Trump’s executive order if the initial sales job were not so vivid.

“It’s not like just a speech,” said Peter Hart, a Democrat who owns a political research firm. “It’s something he continually reinforced.”

Hart, like others in his field, believes Trump’s ability to brand is “a modern miracle” that has already proven a big benefit. And the costs may not prove fatal. Trump has a keen ability to distract from setbacks by causing more controversies.

And while Trump’s low approval ratings have set records for a new president, his core backers, who have largely stuck with him, tend to view his slogans as opening negotiating positions rather than as hard-and-fast commitments.

“Any other politician would already have been punished for what looks like a retreat from stated policies,” said Kevin Madden, a GOP communications consultant who advised Mitt Romney. “But many of Trump’s most ardent supporters give him more leeway since they are more accustomed to Trump, the celebrity businessman from ‘The Apprentice,’ than they are Trump the politician.”

Trump views his branding prowess as an indispensable weapon. He references the “lying and dishonest media” at every turn, calls his club in Florida the “winter White House” and ends many of his speeches and news releases with some form of the phrase “Make America great again.”

“I feel it; it’s an instinct,” he told the New York Times Magazine last year in an interview.

Even at rallies, Trump would dwell on the significance of saying things just right. Never “Lying Ted,” he told audiences while insulting Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, a GOP primary rival. “Lyin’ Ted!” he insisted, reveling in applause as he emphasized the missing consonant.

Crowd reaction has long been a driving force in shaping the president’s rhetoric. When reading prepared speeches, he often veers into popular lines if he senses the crowd is growing bored.

Luntz says he has never seen anyone like Trump, whom he views as a bundle of savvy contradictions. He’s disciplined in that he uses the same phrases repeatedly. Yet he uses them at unpredictable times, keeping his audiences riveted.

Luntz says Trump is able to seem authentic, even though his supporters view his promises as expressions of intent rather than a specific policy program.

“He says what he means and means what he says, even when he doesn’t,” Luntz said.

‘Any other politician would already have been punished for what looks like a retreat from stated policies.’ — Kevin Madden, Republican consultant