Contradictions on immigration
Trump’s ‘military operation’ comment appears to contradict his own aides.
Is there a “military operation,” as the president says, or more traditional enforcement, like his top aides indicate?
WASHINGTON — When President Trump boasts of progress he’s made on his biggest campaign promise — to build a wall and stem the flow of illegal immigration across the southern border — he speaks in terms of unadulterated success.
But few others in the administration go so far. And with White House spokespeople, Cabinet secretaries and immigration officials more willing than the president to acknowledge the far more complicated state of immigration in the U.S., a muddled picture has emerged on where the Trump administration is headed.
Thursday offered a clear example of the problems that arise when Trump and his top aides send different messages.
Discussing recent immigration raids around the country, the president touted an unprecedented “military operation” targeting criminals that resulted in 680 arrests.
“You see what’s happening at the border. All of a sudden for the first time, we’re getting gang members out,” he said. “We’re getting really bad dudes out of this country, and at a rate that nobody’s ever seen before.”
But just last week, the Department of Homeland Security cast the operation as routine.
And in Mexico City hours after Trump spoke, Homeland Security Secretary John F. Kelly pushed back on accusations that he had embarked on a mass deportation of people living in the U.S. illegally.
“We’ll approach this operation systematically, in an organized way, in a resultsoriented way, in an operation and in a human-dignity way,” he said while on a diplomatic mission with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson.
White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer tried to reconcile one apparent contradiction between Trump’s and Kelly’s comments, saying the president meant only that the operation was military-like in its efficiency.
“The president was using that as an adjective,” Spicer said of Trump’s word choice.
The back-and-forth underscored the communications confusion that has quickly become a signature of the Trump administration. It is an outgrowth of the president’s salesman-like tendency toward exaggeration, aides’ repeated false assertions and strategists’ goal of quickly upending bureaucracy and steering it away from Obama administration policy.
Some immigration experts say the conflicting messages serve their own purpose.
“The only thing to me that is clear coming from the chaos of the administration is that the priority is fear — instilling fear,” said Marshall Fitz, an immigration expert at the Emerson Collective, a nonprofit advocacy organization based in Palo Alto.
It is too early to say whether Trump’s orders boosted deportations. Figures for February, Trump’s first full month in office, won’t be available for weeks.
Deportations in January were down slightly from the same month in 2016. Immigration officers removed 16,643 people in January across both administrations, down 22% from the month before, and slightly fewer than 17,649 people deported in January of last year, according to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
In an address to conservative activists outside Washington, White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus and Trump’s chief strategist, Stephen K. Bannon, both listed the administration’s early approach to immigration as among the most crucial steps Trump has taken.
“Protecting the sovereignty of the United States, putting a wall on the southern border, making sure that criminals are not part of our process — these are all things that 80% of Americans agree with and these are all things that President Trump is doing,” Priebus said.
In a host of areas, the president and aides are keen to demonstrate a break from Obama-era policy.
Trump campaigned on what he characterized as a threat to national security posed by criminals illegally crossing the border, especially while President Obama was in office, and his remarks Thursday in the White House’s State Dining Room echoed that.
“What has been allowed to come into our country, when you see gang violence that you’ve read about like never before, and all of the things — much of that is people that are here illegally,” Trump said. “They’re rough and they’re tough, but they’re not tough like our people. So we’re getting them out.”
But with his harsh rhetoric, Trump has mostly ignored that Obama also sought stronger border security and immigration enforcement. Obama was in part trying to create space for a bipartisan legislative effort to enact more comprehensive reform.
Deportations under Obama peaked at 400,000 people in 2012, touching off widespread criticism from immigration advocates, which prompted Homeland Security to scale back deportations.
Last year, deportations fell to 240,000 as the Obama administration focused on targets similar to what Trump described in the raids conducted under his authority: criminals, repeat immigration violators and recent arrivals.
It could take months before deportation levels increase, as immigration officials have limited staff and detention space to hold people. Also, immigration courts are severely backlogged, leading to long delays before a judge officially authorizes someone to be removed.
In the meantime, immigrants in the U.S. illegally can find themselves plumbing any utterance from the administration for signs of what’s to come.
“It is attrition through terror or creating so much chaos that people throw up their hands and leave,” Fitz said of the administration’s strategy so far. “It is certainly not a plan that has a carefully delineated set of priorities based on certain judgments on who presents a threat and who doesn’t.”