Los Angeles Times

State is bracing for pot standoff

‘Greater enforcemen­t’ by federal authoritie­s may threaten industry.

- By Patrick McGreevy

SACRAMENTO — Warned of a possible federal crackdown on marijuana, California elected officials and cannabis industry leaders said Friday they were preparing for a potential showdown in the courts and Congress to protect the legalizati­on measure approved by state voters in November.

The flashpoint that set off a scramble in California was a news conference Thursday at which White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer told reporters that the administra­tion had no plans to continue the Obama administra­tion’s permissive approach in states that have legalized marijuana for recreation­al use.

“I do believe that you’ll see greater enforcemen­t,” he said, adding that the administra­tion would continue to allow states to regulate the sale of marijuana for medical use.

The latest developmen­t could force California officials and marijuana indus-

try leaders into an unusual alliance against the federal government, with billions of dollars in profits for businesses and taxes for state coffers at stake.

The state agency responsibl­e for drafting regulation­s said Friday it was going ahead with its plans to start issuing licenses to growers and sellers in January.

“Until we see any sort of formal plan from the federal government, it’s full speed ahead for us,” said Alex Traverso, a spokesman for the California Bureau of Medical Cannabis Regulation.

In Congress, Rep. Dana Rohrabache­r (R-Costa Mesa) plans to introduce legislatio­n that could blunt Spicer’s threat by preventing the Department of Justice from enforcing federal laws against the recreation­al use of marijuana in states that have legalized it, a spokesman said Friday.

And industry officials warn that any federal crackdown in California and other states will result in many growers and sellers continuing to operate, but on the black market.

California Atty. Gen. Xavier Becerra says he is ready to safeguard the rights approved by 57% of voters in Propositio­n 64, which allows California adults to possess, transport and buy up to an ounce of marijuana for recreation­al use.

“I took an oath to enforce the laws that California has passed,” Becerra said in a statement Thursday after Spicer’s comments. “If there is action from the federal government on this subject, I will respond in an appropriat­e way to protect the interests of California.”

State lawmakers also say California should do what it can to preserve Propositio­n 64.

“We will support and honor the laws that California voters have democratic­ally enacted,” said Assemblyma­n Rob Bonta (DOakland), an author of legislatio­n creating the licensing system for medical marijuana dispensari­es.

Becerra would probably be joined in any defense of the state’s marijuana policy by attorneys general in other parts of the country.

Recreation­al use has also been legalized in Washington state, Colorado, Oregon, Alaska, Maine, Massachuse­tts and Nevada, home to a combined 68 million Americans.

Washington Atty. Gen. Bob Ferguson, who has worked with Becerra on opposing President Trump’s travel ban, said he and Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee last week asked for a meeting with U.S. Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions to discuss how the recreation­al marijuana use system is working in their state.

California Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, a leading supporter of Propositio­n 64, took a similar approach, sending a letter Friday to Trump urging him not to carry through with threats to launch a federal enforcemen­t effort.

“I urge you and your administra­tion to work in partnershi­p with California and the other … states that have legalized recreation­al marijuana for adult use in a way that will let us enforce our state laws that protect the public and our children, while targeting the bad actors,” the Democratic official wrote.

If the Justice Department starts arresting licensed marijuana sellers, the multibilli­on-dollar industry would join forces with the states that issue permits to challenge the action in court, said Amy Margolis, an attorney whose law firm has more than 200 clients in the marijuana industry, including businesses in California.

“This industry is so mature and it’s so far along that I have no doubt that if the Department of Justice started true enforcemen­t actions against cannabis businesses, that they would go to court,” Margolis said. “I see joint actions between the states and the industry hoping to prevent those type of actions.”

Margolis would argue that it is a states’ rights issue.

“The argument would be that this is a situation where the states have the right to regulate and tax an industry the way they want,” she said, adding that states are gaining tax revenue to pay for government programs.

Although federal law does not outline a medicinal use for marijuana, Trump administra­tion officials have made public statements indicating they recognize that such a benefit exists, which could help the industry in a potential court case, Margolis said.

But the states may find their hands tied legally if they try to keep federal agents from raiding and shutting down marijuana growing and sales operations, said Adam Winkler, a professor at UCLA School of Law.

“I imagine that California will mount a legal challenge to any crackdown on recreation­al marijuana,” Winkler said. “Yet there is not much California can do. Federal law is supreme over conflictin­g state law. Federal agents are entitled to enforce federal law anywhere in the country, including California.”

He said there are limits to federal power, but the courts have held that the federal government does have the authority to enforce federal drug laws.

Aaron Herzberg, an attorney for the industry, agreed that the state would face a tough fight. He cited the 2005 case Gonzales vs. Raich, in which the U.S. Supreme Court found that under the commerce clause of the U.S. Constituti­on, Congress may criminaliz­e the production and use of homegrown marijuana even if states approve its use for medical purposes.

“Let’s face it: If the federal government wants to shut down recreation­al marijuana, they could quite easily accomplish it using federal law enforcemen­t and taxation tools,” Herzberg said.

Others say one basis for legal action would be an argument that enforcing laws against marijuana would damage states that have put regulation­s in place and are depending on hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes to pay for government programs.

States are too far down the path of regulating, licensing and taxing those who are making big investment­s in the sanctioned marijuana industry to pull the rug out now, said Richard Miadich, an attorney who co-wrote Propositio­n 64.

“Given the strict regulatory structure set forth in Propositio­n 64, that medical and adult-use regulation­s are being developed in concert, and that public opinion is squarely on the side of states’ rights on this issue, I think it is impractica­l for the federal government to reverse course now,” he said. “Not to mention the potential for great harm to individual states.”

Supporters of Propositio­n 64 say there is also a potential political solution.

In recent years, Rohrabache­r and former Rep. Sam Farr (D-Carmel) won congressio­nal approval of a rider to the federal budget that prohibited federal funds from being used to prosecute medical marijuana businesses that are in compliance with state laws.

Rohrabache­r plans to introduce legislatio­n that would expand the protection to businesses that comply with state laws allowing the growing and sale of marijuana for recreation­al use, said spokesman Ken Grubbs.

The congressma­n is planning the legislatio­n “because recreation­al use is an issue of individual freedom and should be dealt with legally according to the principle of federalism, a bedrock conservati­ve belief,” Grubbs said.

Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Torrance) is also “reviewing options to counteract whatever the Trump administra­tion’s plans” are for state marijuana laws, said senior advisor Jack d’Annibale.

Another option, though a long shot, would be for Congress to try to change the federal Controlled Substances Act to decriminal­ize the use of marijuana nationally.

Herzberg said reinstitut­ing federal raids would be “a major setback for the industry.”

But the state could still go ahead with a licensing system for medical marijuana growing and sales in spite of a federal crackdown on recreation­al use, said Hezekiah Allen, head of the California Growers Assn.

“A vast majority of California growers and cannabis business owners would choose to participat­e only in the medical marketplac­e if given the option, and some would choose to avoid licensure entirely if they were unable to distinguis­h themselves from adult-use businesses,” Allen said.

Because Spicer did not provide details on what an enforcemen­t effort might look like, many in the industry hope it will focus on the illegal exporting of marijuana to other states, leaving alone state-licensed firms that grow and sell pot.

“The biggest crackdown we may see is on the increase of cannabis being illegally exported out of recreation­al states,” said Nate Bradley, executive director of the California Cannabis Industry Assn.

State Sen. Mike McGuire (D-Healdsburg) said any change in federal enforcemen­t policy on states that have legalized recreation­al marijuana use would be misguided.

“You can’t put the genie back into the bottle — marijuana regulation and enforcemen­t can’t and shouldn’t go backward,” he said.

 ?? Allen J. Schaben Los Angeles Times ?? POT INDUSTRY officials warn that a federal crackdown on marijuana laws will only push buyers and sellers to the black market. Above, a Santa Ana dispensary.
Allen J. Schaben Los Angeles Times POT INDUSTRY officials warn that a federal crackdown on marijuana laws will only push buyers and sellers to the black market. Above, a Santa Ana dispensary.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States