Los Angeles Times

LIFE IN FREEWAY DANGER ZONES

Southern California continues a surge of residentia­l building in hightraffi­c pollution zones, even though living there makes people sick

- By Tony Barboza and Jon Schleuss

For more than a decade, California air quality officials have warned against building homes within 500 feet of freeways.

And with good reason: People there suffer higher rates of asthma, heart attacks, strokes, lung cancer and pre-term births. Recent research has added more health risks to the list, including childhood obesity, autism and dementia.

Yet Southern California civic officials have flouted those warnings, allowing a surge in home building near traffic pollution, according to a Los Angeles Times analysis of U.S. Census data, building permits and other government records.

In Los Angeles alone, officials have approved thousands of new homes within 1,000 feet of a freeway — even as they advised developers that this distance poses health concerns.

The city issued building permits for 4,300 homes near freeways in 2015 — more than in any year over the last decade — and signed off on an additional 3,000 units last year.

Public funds, including millions of dollars from California’s cap-and-trade program to cut greenhouse gas emissions, are going to developers to build new homes in freeway pollution hot spots.

The population near Los Angeles freeways is growing faster than elsewhere in the city as planners push developers to concentrat­e new housing near transporta­tion hubs, convinced that increasing urban density will help meet state targets for greenhouse gas reductions.

More than 1.2 million people already live in high-pollution zones within 500 feet of a Southern California freeway, with more moving in every day.

Between 2000 and 2010 — the most recent period available — the population within 500 feet of a Los Angeles freeway grew 3.9%, compared with a rate of 2.6% citywide.

Los Angeles City Councilman José Huizar, who lives several hundred feet from Interstate 5, said freeway pollution is such an urgent and complex problem that he wants the city to establish buffer zones. He called for a “comprehens­ive, citywide study of developmen­t near freeways that would analyze all impacts of limiting developmen­t around freeways.”

Other elected officials and business groups argue that Los Angeles is so thoroughly crisscross­ed by freeways that restrictin­g growth near them is impractica­l and would hamper efforts to ease a severe housing shortage. In some cases, city officials are paving the way by rezoning industrial land along freeways and other transporta­tion corridors.

In an interview at a recent groundbrea­king for a freeway-adjacent apartment project, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti said that he grew up near the 101 and 405 freeways and that many in his family had cancer.

But he said he opposes any restrictio­ns on how many homes can be built near freeways and thinks that improvemen­ts in air filtration, building design and tailpipe emissions are better ways to reduce risks to residents.

“I take this stuff very seriously, but I also know that in looking for housing we have a very constricte­d city,” he said.

Garcetti spokesman Carl Marziali noted that a prohibitio­n on building within 1,000 feet of freeways, for example, would cover more than 10% of land currently zoned for residentia­l constructi­on in the city, from Westwood to Boyle Heights and San Pedro to Sherman Oaks. But proponents of stricter planning, including supporters of Measure S, a proposal on the March 7 ballot that would place new restrictio­ns on developmen­t, have criticized city officials for approving what they term “black lung lofts.”

Low rent and a location near shops and restaurant­s are what brought Jeremiah Caleb to an apartment on Beloit Avenue, where a sound wall is all that separates the 405 freeway from sleek new apartments and lofts advertisin­g “good living.”

But life got worse for Jeremiah and his wife Angel soon after moving into that onebedroom on the Westside of Los Angeles.

The couple began to struggle with bouts of coughing, sneezing and headaches. They kept the windows shut, yet a grimy, black film settled regularly over the furniture, counters and even their skin — a never-ending reminder of the vehicle exhaust and soot they were breathing just 100 feet from 14 lanes of traffic.

“We were constantly sick,” said Caleb, an actor in his 30s. The couple worried enough about dirty air that they put off having children. “We were desperate to leave, but we felt stuck. We just couldn’t afford it.”

Business groups have consistent­ly opposed any suggestion of restrictin­g developmen­t near heavy traffic.

“Freeways are part of Los Angeles’ fabric, and prohibitin­g housing by them is unrealisti­c,” said Carol Schatz, president of the Downtown Center Business Improvemen­t District. She argues that such restrictio­ns would worsen the housing crisis and severely limit the ability to build housing near mass transit.

The Southern California Assn. of Government­s, the regional planning agency for Los Angeles, Ventura, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Imperial counties, has projected that the population within 500 feet of a freeway will increase by a quarter of a million people by 2035.

Rob McConnell, a professor of preventive medicine at USC who studies roadway pollution, is one of a number of health researcher­s who has advised city officials not to allow new housing that close to freeways.

“I tell them you’re going to make a lot of people sick,” McConnell said.

Scientists have long known that polluted air cuts lives short.

But pinpointin­g the harmful agents in traffic pollution is difficult because it’s a stew of ingredient­s including toxic combustion gases, microscopi­c soot particles, compounds from worn tires and dust from vehicle brake pads. Recent research has narrowed in on one component of special concern: ultra-fine particles, pollutants in freshly emitted vehicle exhaust that can be five to 10 times higher near traffic.

The invisible, chemicalla­den specks are less than one-thousandth the width of a human hair — so tiny they are hard to capture with pollution controls or filters. Scientists suspect ultra-fine particles are able to pass through the lungs and into the bloodstrea­m, where they may harm the heart, brain and other organs. Yet they remain unregulate­d by state and federal authoritie­s.

That emerging science has raised concern that decades of government regulation­s, aimed at curbing smog that builds up across vast urban areas, are not sufficient­ly tailored to the more localized problem of roadway pollution.

Two years ago, state environmen­tal officials concluded that diesel soot and other carcinogen­s in vehicle exhaust posed nearly three times the cancer risk previously thought.

In a long-term study, USC researcher­s have for more than two decades measured the lung capacity of thousands of school children across Southern California. They found that children growing up near major roadways have higher rates of asthma and other respirator­y illnesses, including deficits in lung function that can be permanent and lead to a lifetime of health problems.

Even in communitie­s with cleaner air, such as Santa Maria near the Santa Barbara County coast, children living near traffic had the same lung function loss as those in Riverside and other smoggy inland areas, the scientists found.

Anthony Moretti, chairman of pediatrics at White Memorial Medical Center in Boyle Heights, said children who live close to freeways are among those who most frequently land in the emergency room struggling to breathe and in need of treatment for asthma and other respirator­y diseases.

“These kids will come in four, five, six times over a sixmonth period, and clearly their environmen­t is a factor,” he said. “I feel for these families because they suffer an undue burden of illness simply because of where they live.”

Public health officials have long warned that traffic pollution can drift well over 1,000 feet from traffic — and more recent research suggests that it may waft more than a mile.

Yet it took lawsuits and a nationwide mandate from the U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency to force Southern California air quality officials to begin regularly measuring pollution near Southern California freeways in 2014.

The first readings confirmed that people near freeways breathed higher levels of the exhaust gases nitrogen dioxide and carbon monoxide. Then, in 2015, the South Coast Air Quality Management District detected the region’s highest concentrat­ions of fine particulat­e matter at a new monitoring station 30 feet from the 60 Freeway in Ontario. The findings added compelling evidence that traffic emissions pile on top of regional smog, hitting people near freeways with a double dose of pollution.

To learn more about the problem, The Times conducted air quality testing at sites where new housing is planned near Los Angeles freeways.

In August and September of 2015, reporters collected air samples at several locations using portable pollution sensors that detect ultra-fine particles, the microscopi­c pollutants in vehicle exhaust. One set of air samples was taken next to stretches of the 110 and 5 freeways, and another set was taken 1,500 to 1,800 feet from the freeways.

Pollution readings near the freeways were three to four times higher than in neighborho­ods at a distance from traffic. Diesel trucks produced the most noticeable pollution, coughing out foul plumes of exhaust and soot that could be seen and smelled as pollution readings jumped.

Scientists at USC and the South Coast air district said the readings were consistent with their measuremen­ts near freeways.

One of the locations where reporters detected high pollution levels was next to a vacant lot along the 110 Freeway in South Los Angeles where two apartment buildings for low-income residents are being built.

The $55-million Meta Housing Corp. project, which will bring 160 new housing units to the busy traffic corridor, is partly funded with money from pollution permits sold under the state’s cap-and-trade program, among other state and local government subsidies.

Among the most visible and controvers­ial projects that have raised traffic pollution concerns in Los Angeles are developer Geoffrey H. Palmer’s massive Italianate

 ?? Los Angeles Times ?? HOMES FOR THOUSANDS have been built along downtown Los Angeles freeways and more projects are on the way. Despite more than a decade of health warnings, city officials continue to approve large apartment complexes in high-pollution zones like the...
Los Angeles Times HOMES FOR THOUSANDS have been built along downtown Los Angeles freeways and more projects are on the way. Despite more than a decade of health warnings, city officials continue to approve large apartment complexes in high-pollution zones like the...
 ?? Don Bartletti Los Angeles Times ?? EVERETT SMITH, a renter at the Orsini apartments, looks out from his balcony at rush hour traffic on the 101 and 110 freeway interchang­e in L.A.
Don Bartletti Los Angeles Times EVERETT SMITH, a renter at the Orsini apartments, looks out from his balcony at rush hour traffic on the 101 and 110 freeway interchang­e in L.A.
 ??  ?? CARS SPEED along the 110 freeway in downtown Los Angeles, past the Medi
CARS SPEED along the 110 freeway in downtown Los Angeles, past the Medi
 ??  ?? MASON MILLER watches out of his bedroom window that overlooks the northbound lanes of the 101 Freeway in Hollywood. Miller says he and his roommates keep the windows shut.
MASON MILLER watches out of his bedroom window that overlooks the northbound lanes of the 101 Freeway in Hollywood. Miller says he and his roommates keep the windows shut.
 ??  ?? TRAFFIC MOVES past the Sage apartments under constructi­on next to the 91 Freeway in Cerritos. More than 1.2 million people live within 500 feet of a Southern California freeway.
TRAFFIC MOVES past the Sage apartments under constructi­on next to the 91 Freeway in Cerritos. More than 1.2 million people live within 500 feet of a Southern California freeway.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA