Los Angeles Times

Google may have missed a phone opportunit­y

The big problem for Pixel is that only one carrier, Verizon, sells the smartphone.

- By Hayley Tsukayama Tsukayama writes for the Washington Post.

Since its October launch, Google’s Pixel phone has received rave reviews, and Google recently confirmed to the Android-focused publicatio­n Android Pit that it will release a new Pixel this year. Yet despite these successes, it seems the phone may be experienci­ng some trouble on the sales front, and it may have missed an opportunit­y to capitalize on competitor­s’ missteps.

Although Google doesn’t break out its numbers for Pixel units sold, analysts estimate that customers bought about 552,000 Pixel phones by the end of 2016, according to USA Today. In comparison, Apple Inc. sold 78 million iPhones between late September and December. Samsung sold 2.5 million Galaxy Note 7 phones between its mid-August launch and its October discontinu­ation.

To put that in perspectiv­e, Google’s market share for smartphone­s shipped is now less than 1% worldwide — compared with Samsung’s 18% — said Ramon Llamas, a research manager for analysis firm Internatio­nal Data Corp. So if Google is making its mark, it’s still a small one relative to the Samsung empire, which also runs on Google’s Android operating system. (Apple, meanwhile, is at 18.2%, according to IDC.)

Google, a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc., did not respond to a request for comment.

So what’s going on? On paper, the Pixel seemed as if it should have been a slam dunk for Google given the Pixel’s Google branding, Samsung’s Note 7 problems and criticism of Apple’s latest iPhones not being that revolution­ary. The Pixel is also an undeniably good phone, particular­ly in the absence of strong competitio­n, thanks to its quality constructi­on, pure version of Android and special Google features such as the voice-controlled Assistant. And Google has great brand recognitio­n; it came in eighth in a reputation ranking looking at the world’s most visible companies. Samsung, on the same list, was 49th in the wake of its Note 7 problems and other issues.

And it’s not as though Google isn’t trying to sell this phone. It has sunk considerab­le effort and a reported $3.2 million in marketing, according to Reuters, into making the Pixel stand out as the “Google phone.” A profile of Google’s ad campaign from Fast Co. revealed that Google chose to feature its well-known search bar in Pixel advertisin­g to closely tie in the smartphone with its most iconic product.

The big problem for Pixel is that only one carrier, Verizon, sells the phone, said Jeff Moore of research firm Wave7 Research. Although users can get it directly from Google for the full price of $649 — and take it to another carrier if they want — that’s not an option that a majority of wireless customers consider.

“That’s a big minus,” Moore said.

Companies sometimes offer phones with just one carrier, particular­ly when launching a new line; Apple’s iPhone was an AT&T exclusive at first, and Google has tapped Verizon as a carrier partner for its co-branded Nexus phones in the past.

According to Wave7’s research, the Pixel got off to a good start, with many in the survey saying demand was as high for Google’s phone as for other well-known manufactur­ers’. But some of that excitement is starting to cool. Verizon representa­tives surveyed by Wave7 estimated the Pixel accounted for 6.2% of activation­s in February, a decline from the previous three months.

Compoundin­g the availabili­ty issue, Moore said, is that stores are having trouble keeping the phones in stock. That’s a good sign for Google in terms of demand, but it’s a bad sign for the company in terms of being able to capitalize on that demand, he said.

Because of unexpected­ly high demand, Google has had some trouble getting enough parts to make its phones, according to reports from the Verge as well as other industry analysts.

That’s not to say the Pixel couldn’t pick up more steam over time. After all, the smartphone world seems a little boring right now, judging by the headlines coming out of last week’s Mobile World Congress. The mostdiscus­sed phone launched at the usually jam-packed show was a revived Nokia phone that last saw its heyday in 2000. But Samsung is set to announce its new phone March 29; if it’s a hit, analysts said, Google is set to face fiercer competitio­n.

Google professes to be happy with the Pixel’s sales. When talking to investors about Google’s last earnings report, Chief Executive Sundar Pichai said he was “thrilled” with the reception that the company’s hardware had received this past holiday season.

Moore, the Wave7 analyst, said he’s still bullish on Pixel: “They’ve gained a foothold at Verizon, and I’m sensing that demand is there.” Google, he said, has the deep pockets and the branding to push it forward.

But as it stands right now, Google’s Pixel is more of an interestin­g experiment than a full-blown success, said IDC’s Ramos. “It’s great as a Verizon customer,” he said. “But we’re five months into this, and still at a point where supply cannot meet demand.”

 ?? Ramin Talaie ?? GOOGLE’S PIXEL smartphone seemed as if it should have been a slam dunk given the problems with Samsung’s Note 7 and criticism of Apple’s latest iPhones.
Ramin Talaie GOOGLE’S PIXEL smartphone seemed as if it should have been a slam dunk given the problems with Samsung’s Note 7 and criticism of Apple’s latest iPhones.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States