Los Angeles Times

‘No evidence’ of wiretappin­g

GOP and Democratic committee leaders see no evidence that Obama wiretapped him. Inquiries into Russian influence in election continue.

- By David S. Cloud david.cloud@latimes.com Twitter: @DavidCloud­LAT

Leaders of the House Intelligen­ce Committee dispute Trump’s allegation against Obama.

WASHINGTON — The House Intelligen­ce Committee has seen no evidence to support President Trump’s claim that he was wiretapped by President Obama, the panel’s leaders said Wednesday, deepening a dispute with the White House over the president’s veracity.

“We don’t have any evidence that that took place and, in fact, I don’t believe — just in the last week of time, the people we’ve talked to — I don’t think there was an actual tap of Trump Tower,” said Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Tulare), the committee chairman.

“I have seen no evidence that supports the claim that President Trump made,” agreed Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Burbank), the ranking member.

FBI Director James B. Comey is scheduled to testify Monday at the first congressio­nal hearing into Russia’s role in the 2016 campaign, and Nunes and Schiff say they will ask him whether the FBI secretly conducted electronic or other surveillan­ce of Trump. If Comey declines to answer, they say, they could subpoena the records.

Comey also is likely to face questionin­g about whether the FBI opened a formal investigat­ion into contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian government officials — a question the FBI has so far been unwilling to answer in public.

In tweets on March 4, Trump twice accused Obama of wiretappin­g him before his inaugurati­on and urged Congress to investigat­e the claim. A spokesman for Obama described the claim as false, and no evidence has emerged to substantia­te it.

The dispute over the seemingly rash tweets has become one of the most serious of the first months of Trump’s presidency, dividing him from Republican­s in Congress and raising the possibilit­y that law enforcemen­t and intelligen­ce officials will publicly undercut him.

The White House has not offered any evidence of wiretappin­g or other surveillan­ce, but Trump did not back down. In an interview Wednesday on Fox News’ “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” Trump suggested new disclosure­s would be forthcomin­g.

“Wiretap covers a lot of different things. I think you’re going to find some very interestin­g items coming to the forefront over the next two weeks,” he said, according to an excerpt released before the interview was broadcast.

The question of whether Trump and his associates were caught up in FBI surveillan­ce is one of many under scrutiny by the House and Senate intelligen­ce committees. Both are in the early stages of parallel investigat­ions into Russia’s attempts to influence the 2016 elections.

Nunes and Schiff say they are still seeking to hire additional staff for the House investigat­ion and negotiatin­g with the Office of the Director of National Intelligen­ce, which oversees the U.S. intelligen­ce community, over access to the computers used to store classified informatio­n on Russia’s role in the presidenti­al race.

While the two lawmakers agree that no evidence of FBI surveillan­ce of Trump has been uncovered, Nunes has raised the possibilit­y that Trump campaign communicat­ions might have been picked up in “incidental” intelligen­ce collection aimed at Russian officials.

Monday’s hearing will be the first to examine Russia’s attempts to interfere in the 2016 presidenti­al campaign by hacking into Democratic National Committee computers and leaking thousands of emails, as well as other operations intended to discredit the election.

The committee also is looking at whether Trump and his associates had improper contacts with Russian government officials during or after the campaign.

Nunes said he was not aware of any evidence that Trump aides spoke with Russian officials other than Sergey Kislyak, Russia’s ambassador to the U.S., who had multiple conversati­ons with Trump campaign aides and surrogates, including Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions when Sessions was still in the Senate.

Sessions recused himself from Justice Department investigat­ions into Russia’s role in the campaign after news reports confirmed he had met twice with Kislyak, including once in his office in September, but had failed to disclose the contacts during his Senate confirmati­on hearing.

Schiff, who said he had visited CIA headquarte­rs Tuesday to examine classified documents, refused to rule out further possible contacts between Trump’s team and Russian authoritie­s.

A U.S. intelligen­ce report issued in January, shortly before Trump took office, assessed that Russian President Vladimir Putin had ordered Russian intelligen­ce agencies to use cyberattac­ks and other means to hurt Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and help Trump.

FBI officials have refused to discuss their investigat­ion, and there has been no proof that they have discovered wrongdoing by any Trump associate.

Nunes conceded that one should not read Trump’s tweets about being wiretapped by Obama as literally true. But Trump may have been expressing concern that he and his associates came under government surveillan­ce “either appropriat­ely or inappropri­ately,” he said.

“We want to find that out,” he added.

Nunes said he was also concerned about leaks of classified informatio­n that have roiled the Trump administra­tion.

Trump’s first national security advisor, Michael Flynn, was forced to resign last month after leaks indicated he had discussed U.S. sanctions on Russia during several telephone conversati­ons with Kislyak before Trump’s inaugurati­on, and then had misled Vice President Pence about the conversati­ons.

Officials said surveillan­ce in that case was aimed at the Russian ambassador, not at Flynn.

The FBI is prohibited by law from intercepti­ng telephone calls or conducting other electronic surveillan­ce on U.S. citizens and others living in the United States, barring a court order.

Communicat­ions involving Americans inadverten­tly intercepte­d by U.S. intelligen­ce agencies are supposed to be kept confidenti­al unless they contain evidence of a crime or involve foreign intelligen­ce.

Seeking informatio­n about the source of possible leaks, Nunes and Schiff sent a letter to the FBI, CIA and National Security Agency on Wednesday seeking details of any U.S. individual­s who were associated with the Trump and Clinton campaigns whose communicat­ions were picked up during surveillan­ce of legitimate targets, and not kept confidenti­al.

‘We don’t have any evidence that [wiretappin­g] took place and, in fact, I don’t believe ... there was an actual tap of Trump Tower.’ — Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Tulare), chairman of the House Intelligen­ce Committee

 ?? J. Scott Applewhite Associated Press ?? HOUSE INTELLIGEN­CE Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Tulare) has said it is possible that Trump campaign communicat­ions were picked up in “incidental” intelligen­ce collection targeting Russian officials.
J. Scott Applewhite Associated Press HOUSE INTELLIGEN­CE Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Tulare) has said it is possible that Trump campaign communicat­ions were picked up in “incidental” intelligen­ce collection targeting Russian officials.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States