Los Angeles Times

Trump’s retreat on emissions

-

President Trump announced Wednesday that his administra­tion would reconsider the aggressive vehicle fuel economy targets that were approved by the U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency under President Obama — setting the stage, perhaps, for revoking the standards altogether. That would not only lead to more greenhouse gas emissions and a less robust battle against global warming, but it would also slow the rollout of less polluting, more fuel efficient cars.

Adopted with industry support in 2009 as part of the bailout of General Motors and Chrysler, the standards required cars and light trucks to become efficient enough to average about 54 miles per gallon by 2025, compared to about 36 miles per gallon today. The first phase of the rules, affecting cars through 2021, is already in place. But the Obama administra­tion finalized the second phase, dictating the standards through 2025, in the weeks before Trump’s inaugurati­on.

Automakers complained that the second phase review was rushed. They successful­ly petitioned Trump to revoke its approval, and are continuing to lobby for the rules to be relaxed further. Trump’s announceme­nt Wednesday is one of the first concrete steps by his administra­tion to dismantle Obama’s policies to cut greenhouse gas emissions. This should surprise no one, given Trump’s assertion on the campaign trail that climate change is a “hoax” and his decision to nominate a climate-change skeptic to head the EPA. But it’s still a terrible decision.

The world is now seeing the effects of global warming; on Wednesday, for instance, an article in the journal Nature revealed that enormous sections of the Great Barrier Reef in Australia had been killed by overly warm ocean water. Countries must move quickly to limit the looming damage of climate change, and as the world’s largest economy and one of the major sources of greenhouse emissions, the U.S. has an obligation to lead by example. Yet experts have warned that the repeal of the tailpipe emissions standards would make difficult for the U.S. to meet the commitment­s it made under the 2015 Paris agreement on climate change.

The announceme­nt Wednesday also sets the stage for a fight between California and the federal government. The state has adopted an ambitious program to fight climate change, including reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 40% from 1990 levels by 2030. To help meet those goals, Gov. Jerry Brown and legislator­s have already said they intend to hold automakers to the new tailpipe standards and will invoke the state’s power under the Clean Air Act to adopt even more stringent air pollution rules for cars. EPA Administra­tor Scott Pruitt refused to say during his confirmati­on hearings that he would respect California’s authority and has reportedly begun exploring legal avenues to deny the state the necessary waiver.

That would be a huge mistake. California has a long history of using its air pollution regulation­s to spur innovation within the auto industry. Over decades, the state’s aggressive tailpipe standards have helped dramatical­ly cut smog and other pollutants, which is why a dozen other states have adopted California’s rules, as allowed by the Clean Air Act. Yet Southern California and other regions still suffer from high levels of pollution, and there is a need to continue to cut tailpipe emissions even further. Any attempt by the Trump administra­tion to block California’s cleaner-car standards is an attack on public health.

It would also be incredibly shortsight­ed to roll back fuel efficiency standards. With gas prices surging just a few years ago, there was bipartisan agreement on the need to reduce dependence on foreign oil. U.S. automakers were struggling financiall­y because they were over-reliant on the sale of big gas guzzling vehicles, having failed to anticipate the demand for more fuel efficient models.

But now manufactur­ers complain that the 2025 standards are too onerous because, in part, that demand has cooled. Fully electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids are just 1% of sales. Certainly the decline in gas prices has temporaril­y dulled the appeal of alternativ­e fuel vehicles. (It also doesn’t help that automakers and dealership­s spend almost no money marketing them.) But this is shortterm thinking that ignores the value of innovation and technologi­cal advancemen­ts.

Federal and California tailpipe standards have helped spur tremendous progress in electric and hybrid vehicles in recent years, with cars coming onto the market that can drive farther on a tank of gas or a single charge-up. This is the future. It must be, to clean the air today and to forestall the damage of climate change.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States