Los Angeles Times

Painful or friendly breakup?

What lies ahead for Britain and the European Union as ‘Brexit’ begins

- By Ann M. Simmons ann.simmons@latimes.com Special correspond­ents Kim Wilshire in Paris and Christina Boyle in London contribute­d to this report.

The two-year countdown began Wednesday toward Britain’s official departure from the European Union, raising a question: What happens now?

There will be deals to work out, among them trade, legal agreements, and the rights of British expatriate­s living in EU nations. British Prime Minister Theresa May called the move to leave the EU, dubbed Brexit, a “unique opportunit­y” to “shape a brighter future” for the country. But there will likely be several pitfalls to navigate before March 29, 2019, the deadline for signing off on a final agreement.

“There is no precedent for this.” said Kal Raustiala, professor of law and director of the Burkle Center for Internatio­nal Relations at UCLA. “It’s hard not to imagine that this wouldn’t be one of the most protracted and difficult negotiatio­ns in European history. This is going to be really, really quite complex.”

Here’s a look at how and why Britain got to this point and the rocky road ahead.

Why did Britain decide to vote on leaving the EU?

After a contentiou­s campaign, a referendum was held on June 23 to decide whether the United Kingdom — England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland — should end its 44-year membership in the political and economic confederat­ion of 28 European states. The vote to leave the EU won by 51.9% to 48.1%, in what was the highest turnout for a British wide vote since the general election of 1992. A record 71.8% went to the “Brexit polls,” with more than 30 million people voting.

Who wanted to leave and who wanted to remain?

Britons in the “leave” camp blamed permanent immigrants and temporary residents from other EU countries living in the U.K. for undercutti­ng wages, exploiting benefits such as access to housing, and for the longer waits for services, like healthcare.

Fears over the possibilit­y of would-be terrorists slipping into the country among the recent flood of migrants to Europe from Syria, Afghanista­n and Africa, and dissatisfa­ction over what many Britons viewed as efforts by the EU to dilute the authority of individual member states, were among the other factors influencin­g those who voted to leave.

Britons who supported the “remain” campaign argued that EU migrants were good for the country because they fuel economic growth, and many were employed in blue-collar jobs that some British citizens don’t want to do. The anti-Brexiters also pointed to the benefits of Britain’s participat­ion in the single EU market, where it faces no import or export tariffs, together with the advantages that British citizens have to travel and live in EU member states without a visa. The remain camp also argued that leaving would hurt jobs, living standards, housing prices and Britain’s long-term economic stability.

What happened after the referendum?

Former Prime Minister David Cameron resigned and Theresa May was elected by members of her Conservati­ve Party to take the helm and begin the process toward triggering Article 50.

What is Article 50?

It’s part of an EU law, the 2009 Lisbon Treaty, that sets in motion and lays out the ground rules for the process of withdrawin­g from the EU — something that no country has done before. The terms of Britain’s withdrawal have to be negotiated with the remaining EU member states.

What are some of the issues up for negotiatio­n?

Trade is a big one. Britain will have to negotiate a new trade deal with EU nations. May has made clear in recent months that the U.K. does not intend to remain in the EU’s single trade market, but Britain will try to maintain access to this market on similar terms as other member states — namely, the free flow of goods and services.

“The EU will try to drive a fairly hard bargain, not necessaril­y a punitive one, but one that is sufficient­ly tough that it would deter other would-be exiters,” said Raustiala, the UCLA professor. “There’s going to be a fair bit of brinksmans­hip and bluffing on both sides.”

If there is no agreement at the end of two years of negotiatio­ns with the EU, the U.K. will be subject to World Trade Organizati­on rules, which means trade tariffs on all goods sold to the EU.

There’s also debate over how Britain will deal with trade disputes, because it will no longer fall under the authority of the European Court of Justice. And the British Parliament will have to repeal the European Communitie­s Act, which gives EU law preeminenc­e in the U.K.

Parliament will have to rescind, amend or maintain other EU agreements, running to some 80,000 pages.

Decisions will have to be made about the rights of British expatriate­s living and working visa-free in EU countries, and reciprocal agreements for EU nationals residing in the U.K. Cross-border security arrangemen­ts, the European Arrest Warrant (which is valid throughout member states), relocation of EU agencies that have their headquarte­rs in the U.K., and the U.K.’s contributi­on to pensions of EU civil servants would also need to be ironed out, the BBC reported.

Will Britain be better off ?

Depends on whom you ask. Proponents of Brexit back Prime Minister May’s assertion that Britain now has a chance to “shape a brighter future.” May also maintains that Brexit would give Britain greater power over decision-making and the ability to “take control of the things that matter most to us.”

But some experts believe there will be more pain before joy, and some signs of discomfort are already apparent.

Since the referendum, the British pound has significan­tly declined against the U.S. dollar and the euro, and inflation rose to 2.3% February — its highest rate for 31⁄2 years — according to the BBC.

There have also been reports of bank and businesses relocating, or exploring relocation, to other capitals.

“What Britain is going to realize is that markets have no flag and historical loyalty is minimal,” said Nicholas Cull, a professor of public diplomacy at USC Annenberg School of Communicat­ion and Journalism. “They’re going to go where the deal is best. Right now, it’s unlikely it’s going to be best in a Britain isolated from the European Union.”

“As the [Brexit process] moves forward, any happy landing is a long way in the future,” Cull said.

Could Britain change its mind, or later rejoin the EU?

On delivering the official exit letter to the EU president, May described the moment as “historic” and one “from which there can be no turning back.”

In reality, if the U.K. wanted to rejoin the EU, it would have to essentiall­y start from scratch and there would have to be unanimous agreement from all other EU member states. Many of those countries are upset over the U.K.’s departure and might be hesitant to let the nation rejoin their ranks.

 ?? Daniel Leal-Olivas AFP/Getty Images ?? DEMONSTRAT­ORS carry Union and EU f lags as they pass the Houses of Parliament during a rally after a pro-European Union march in London last week.
Daniel Leal-Olivas AFP/Getty Images DEMONSTRAT­ORS carry Union and EU f lags as they pass the Houses of Parliament during a rally after a pro-European Union march in London last week.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States