Los Angeles Times

POST-‘GRADUATE’ Seen now, the film is colder, darker than remembered

- KENNETH TURAN FILM CRITIC KENNETH TURAN

Seeing “The Graduate” again decades after an initial viewing is, appropriat­ely enough, like attending a college reunion. Films are in a sense like old friends, and revisiting them years later inevitably raises the question of whether what you once enjoyed still brings you pleasure.

With “The Graduate,” which will play theatrical­ly across Los Angeles on Sunday and Wednesday in a new 4K digital restoratio­n presented by Fathom Events as part of the TCM Big Screen Classics series, the results are mixed.

There is no question that from a film history point of view, “The Graduate” deserves this kind of 50th-anniversar­y respect. Adapted by Calder Willingham and Buck Henry from the Charles Webb novel, it sprang initially from the passion of producer Lawrence Turman, who bought the rights to the book for $1,000 and sent it unsolicite­d to director Mike Nichols, who later said it was “the only time in my whole life that that ever happened successful­ly.”

The result was a major box office success, nominated for seven Oscars including best picture and acting nods for stars Anne Bancroft, Dustin Hoffman and Katharine Ross, plus an Oscar victory for Nichols. Its effects on American culture are considered to be even more pronounced.

Among other things, “The Graduate” featured landmark soundtrack

use of Simon & Garfunkel songs like “The Sound of Silence” and “Scarboroug­h Fair,” made “Mrs. Robinson, you’re trying to seduce me” into a national catchphras­e, helped pioneer a change in the nature of leading men and became a touchstone for young people feeling concerned, as recent college graduate Benjamin Braddock is, about their future and their place in the adult world they are reluctantl­y entering.

But looked at now, “The Graduate” is, frankly, a film you admire more than you actually enjoy experienci­ng. Dark, pitiless and despairing, it plays stranger and more distant to me today than it did back in the day. So much so that one wonders whether that was the plan from the beginning, when the fact that its mildly transgress­ive attitude seemed fresh and new disguised its essential nature.

Inevitably helping with the hiding was the formally impressive, borderline glib facility with the cinematic medium Nichols displayed in this, only his second film as a director.

That skill was enhanced by Nichols’ extraordin­arily gifted group of below-theline collaborat­ors. A tip of the hat, please, for cinematogr­apher Robert Surtees, editor Sam O’Steen, production designer Richard Sylbert and Tony-winning costume designer Patricia Zipprodt. Even the hair stylist was legendary: Sydney Guilaroff, who had done Grace Kelly’s hair for her wedding to Prince Rainier and had credits ranging from “The Wizard of Oz” to “North by Northwest.”

But none of this expertise could counteract Nichols’ work, which always evinced a kind of coldness and dis- tance that I’ve never, well, warmed to and that stood in the way of my completely embracing “The Graduate” this time around.

While my younger self may have identified with just-graduated Ben and his overly earnest concerns with his future and his self-indulgent determinat­ion to tell everyone in sight, “I have some things on my mind,” he now seemed callower than I remembered.

Also not wearing well were Benjamin’s obtuse parents (played by William Daniels and Elizabeth Wilson) and their Southern California friends, all mercilessl­y skewered as wellmeanin­g monsters of self-involvemen­t.

Things pick up immeasurab­ly, of course, with the arrival of Bancroft’s Mrs. Robinson, the wife of Ben’s father’s law partner and a woman whose predatory nature is deftly underlined by her preference for leopardski­n garments.

Both Bancroft and Hoffman (in reality only six years apart in age) had New York theatrical experience and play beautifull­y off each other. The choreograp­hed interplay between her sureness and his awkwardnes­s (“You’re the most attractive of my parents’ friends” is his idea of a compliment) remains immaculate.

Good as these actors are, the relationsh­ip between their characters is by definition a premise, setting us up for what comes later, and what comes later is a very different story.

Things do seem promising when the Robinsons’ college-age daughter, Elaine (Ross), comes down from Berkeley, if only because she’s the most recognizab­ly human character in the entire film.

But not only does Ben’s falling for Elaine seem completely arbitrary, even by movie standards, but the act also deranges him in a not particular­ly appealing way, turning this lost young man into more of a scary stalker than a lovestruck swain.

Merciless toward its characters as well as the audience, “The Graduate” plays on a new viewing like a subversive, anti-romantic film best categorize­d as a bleak parody of the happilyeve­r-after genre. The next time it gets re-released, this examinatio­n of the power of obsession should be put on a double bill with Alfred Hitchcock’s classic “Vertigo.” Believe it or not, it belongs there.

 ?? Embassy Pictures / Getty Images ?? MRS. ROBINSON (Anne Bancroft) has an affair with the much-younger Benjamin Braddock (Dustin Hoffman) in “The Graduate.”
Embassy Pictures / Getty Images MRS. ROBINSON (Anne Bancroft) has an affair with the much-younger Benjamin Braddock (Dustin Hoffman) in “The Graduate.”
 ?? Embassy Pictures / Getty Images ?? MIKE NICHOLS, left, directs a scene between Katharine Ross and Dustin Hoffman in “The Graduate.”
Embassy Pictures / Getty Images MIKE NICHOLS, left, directs a scene between Katharine Ross and Dustin Hoffman in “The Graduate.”
 ?? Strand Releasing ?? BENJAMIN (Hoffman) catches the eye of Mrs. Robinson (Anne Bancroft).
Strand Releasing BENJAMIN (Hoffman) catches the eye of Mrs. Robinson (Anne Bancroft).

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States