Los Angeles Times

New ‘global gag rule’ will hurt the poor

The ill-advised plan will hamper the delivery of needed healthcare in the developing world.

- T is not surprising

Ibut it is deeply depressing that the Trump administra­tion is reviving the “global gag rule” — so called because it bans U.S. financial assistance to nongovernm­ental healthcare organizati­ons in foreign countries if they provide abortions or even utter the word to their patients in counseling them or referring them elsewhere.

The rule was first put into place during the Reagan administra­tion and since then has been repealed and revived alternatel­y by Democratic and Republican administra­tions, including President Obama’s.

The rule was bad enough in its earlier form, when it barred aid to family planning organizati­ons that offered abortion or abortion counseling. The last time it was in place, during the George W. Bush administra­tion, family planning organizati­ons receiving $600 million in funding were affected.

But the new Trump administra­tion incarnatio­n of the rule is far more expansive. Instead of applying specifical­ly to family planing programs, it will now cover approximat­ely $8.8 billion in funds given out to healthcare providers of all sorts through the State Department, the U.S. Agency for Internatio­nal Developmen­t and the Defense Department. Healthcare providers overseas working in HIV/AIDS, maternal and child health, malaria, global health security and other fields will be required to sign the agreement. And many of those providers also offer abortion or abortion counseling.

The rule creates particular problems for healthcare providers treating people with HIV and AIDS. Signing the agreement would mean, for example, never being able to give a pregnant woman infected with HIV counseling on abortion.

State Department officials say that the gag rule is necessary to ensure that U.S. tax dollars do not support foreign organizati­ons that “perform or actively promote abortion as a method of family planning.”

But there is already a law in place that prohibits the use of U.S. funds for abortions. So the gag rule is not necessary for that. It’s just a way to pressure — and ultimately punish — organizati­ons that provide abortions or abortion counseling.

Worse yet, the rule threatens to cripple the provision of healthcare to underserve­d, wretchedly poor parts of the world. Most of the funding for HIV and AIDS assistance as well as maternal care and family planning now goes to about 30 African countries.

For healthcare organizati­ons to stop providing abortions would be neither easy nor the right thing to do. In many places, one clinic serves multiple functions — taking care of women and children, treating HIV, testing for sexually transmitte­d diseases, offering family planning and contracept­ives and sometimes abortions or abortion counseling — all extremely important functions.

In some countries, particular­ly in Africa, a legal abortion can mean life or death for a woman who gets pregnant unintentio­nally. If she can’t get a legal, safe abortion, she may opt for an illegal, dangerous one. An unmarried female may have to face the wrath of her family. Although State Department officials say that an abortion referral in the case of rape, incest or to save the life of the woman is exempted from the rule, many providers are expected to refuse to sign an agreement that will generally restrict them from offering abortion services to those who need them.

So providers are faced with a horrible choice: either refuse to provide patients with necessary informatio­n or important reproducti­ve rights services, or sacrifice desperatel­y needed funding from the U.S.

The State Department says that if current recipients of U.S. funding decline to take take any further aid because of the new policy, it will find other organizati­ons to provide the non-abortion-related healthcare services. But healthcare advocates say it won’t be easy to find other providers in the developing world to pick up the slack.

In the end, it’s possible that this policy will result in more abortions, not fewer. Stanford University researcher­s found that abortions significan­tly increased in Africa when the gag rule was in effect during the George W. Bush administra­tion, perhaps because of lost funding for programs offering contracept­ives and family planning counseling.

The global gag rule will hamper the delivery of desperatel­y needed healthcare in the developing world. If the administra­tion truly cares about protecting life, it should scrap this policy immediatel­y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States