Los Angeles Times

Trump lawyer walks back tweet

Despite what he said, the president is not being investigat­ed for possible obstructio­n, the attorney says.

- By Don Lee don.lee@latimes.com Twitter: @dleelatime­s

WASHINGTON — One of President Trump’s lawyers insisted Sunday that a tweet in which he wrote of “being investigat­ed” did not confirm that he was, in fact, under investigat­ion, as senators of both parties suggested the inquiry would run for many more months whether Trump was unhappy about it or not.

Trump’s intemperat­e tweets have by now become commonplac­e, but few have been as revealing as last week’s volley of statements expressing outrage in the government’s investigat­ion of Russia’s meddling in the 2016 presidenti­al election.

Casting aspersions on the Justice Department and its inquiry, Trump on Friday seemed to confirm that he was under investigat­ion for possible obstructio­n of justice by the special counsel looking into Russia’s actions.

“I am being investigat­ed for firing the FBI Director by the man who told me to fire the FBI Director! Witch Hunt!” Trump tweeted.

But on Sunday, Jay Sekulow, one of Trump’s lawyers, insisted that the president’s statement did not amount to an acknowledg­ment that he was under investigat­ion.

Trump’s tweet was “in response” to a Washington Post story Wednesday indicating that the special counsel’s investigat­ion now included the president, Sekulow said in television interviews. Trump was merely restating what the Post and other media had reported, Sekulow suggested.

“Let me be very clear here, as it has been since the beginning, the president is not and has not been under investigat­ion for obstructio­n,” Sekulow said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

Sekulow did not provide much evidence for that statement, which he repeated as he made the rounds on Sunday talk shows.

He told CBS’ “Face the Nation” that there had been no notice from the office of the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, that Trump was under investigat­ion.

The FBI and federal prosecutor­s, however, do not routinely notify people that they are under investigat­ion. Notificati­on is often provided if a person has become a “target,” meaning that charges could be imminent, but is not generally provided at the early stages of an investigat­ion.

Sekulow also cited the recent congressio­nal testimony of former FBI Director James B. Comey, who said he told Trump on several occasions that he was not being personally investigat­ed. Those conversati­ons, however, took place before Trump fired Comey — one of the acts that could be interprete­d as part of an effort to obstruct the case — and before the Justice Department appointed Mueller.

Later, in an interview on “Fox News Sunday,” Sekulow conceded that he couldn’t be sure of his statement. “I cannot read the mind of the special prosecutor,” he said.

Trump’s tweets have exasperate­d some of his aides and many of his supporters, even as they seek to defend him against what they see as a partisan investigat­ion.

“Trump has a compulsion to counteratt­ack. And he is very pugnacious,” former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week.”

“I don’t think it serves him well. I don’t think that tweet helped him,” Gingrich said of the remark suggesting that Trump was being investigat­ed. “But it’s almost like it’s who he has been his whole life,” Gingrich added. “I mean, he’s been a fighter his whole life. He is infuriated, and legitimate­ly, in my judgment, by this whole Russian baloney.”

Other prominent Republican­s expressed more support for the inquiry and defended Mueller’s integrity.

“The president’s pretty fired up about this,” said Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), adding that he had discussed the inquiry with Trump on Friday.

“He, from every pronouncem­ent we have seen, feels very strongly that he did nothing wrong, and he wants people to say that, because he feels very strongly about it. I don’t think that’s a mystery. And he’s expressing himself in that way,” Rubio said on “Meet the Press.”

“That said,” Rubio added, Trump’s displeasur­e “in no way is going to impede any of this work from continuing. It’s going to happen.

“This is going to move forward. We’re going to get the full truth out there,” he said.

Asked whether he believed that Russian agents had tried to influence the election, Rubio said he did.

“Not only do I believe it, I know it. Almost everybody else does” other than Trump, he said. “Ultimately, whether he believes it or not, the work’s going to move forward.

“The FBI doesn’t sit around all day and read tweets. The FBI’s going to do their job; Mueller’s going to do his job,” Rubio said. “And the best thing that can happen for everybody, the president, the country, our institutio­ns [of] the government, is for a full and thorough and credible investigat­ion that reveals everything.”

That process still has a long way to run, said Sen. Angus King of Maine, an independen­t who caucuses with the Democrats. King and Rubio are both members of the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee, which is running an investigat­ion that partially parallels the Justice Department inquiry being run by Mueller.

“I can say categorica­lly that the collusion, the cooperatio­n, aspect of the investigat­ion is not over. And as far as that goes, I’d say we’re 20% into it,” King said.

“A lot of people have said, ‘When do you think you’ll be done?’ Maybe the end of the year. This is a very complex matter, involving thousands of pages of intelligen­ce documents, lots of witnesses. There’s a lot of informatio­n yet to go.”

Sekulow suggested that Trump had taken to Twitter because the president wanted to fight back against news organizati­ons that Trump and his supporters have repeatedly accused of using leaks and anonymous sources to undermine the president.

“So his legal team and the president responds,” Sekulow said on NBC.

Yet Trump’s tweets in recent days condemning the actions of his own Justice Department have reached an intense level, revealing the president’s increasing agitation about the inquiry and the attention it has drawn.

On Sunday, Trump again called the investigat­ion a “witch hunt.” Last week he described the concerns about Russian influence in U.S. elections as a “phony” story.

 ?? Steve Helber Associated Press ?? ATTORNEY Jay Sekulow said President Trump’s tweet about “being investigat­ed” did not amount to an acknowledg­ment that he was under investigat­ion. Trump was only restating what a Washington Post story said, Sekulow suggested.
Steve Helber Associated Press ATTORNEY Jay Sekulow said President Trump’s tweet about “being investigat­ed” did not amount to an acknowledg­ment that he was under investigat­ion. Trump was only restating what a Washington Post story said, Sekulow suggested.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States