Los Angeles Times

Supervisor­s OK landfill expansion

Critics say the permit for Chiquita Canyon puts business interests before public health.

- By Nina Agrawal nina.agrawal@latimes.com

Following a public hearing that lasted nearly two hours, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisor­s unanimousl­y decided this week to move forward with expanding the Chiquita Canyon Landfill in the Santa Clarita Valley.

Environmen­tal activists and residents opposed a new permit, hoping to see the facility close for good.

“Landfills are … unhealthy for the people that live next to them, and they’re unhealthy for the entire Los Angeles region,” said Lynne Plambeck of the Santa Clarita Organizati­on for Planning and the Environmen­t, one of four civic groups that filed appeals to the permit. “The promise to the community and to the people that depend on this board was not kept.”

The landfill, located in the semirural community of Val Verde, began operating in 1972. After a protracted fight, its operators and community members reached an agreement 25 years later that allowed for an expansion — but included a provision that Chiquita Canyon would close when it reached 23 million tons of waste or in November 2019, whichever occurred first.

Last year, as the landfill was about to reach that limit, owner Waste Connection­s Inc. quietly obtained a waiver from the county that allowed the dump to stay open while it pursued a new permit for another expansion. But the company appealed the terms of the proposed expansion permit on the grounds that the county was imposing overly burdensome waste limits and operating fees.

“Chiquita is a basic component of the county’s infrastruc­ture,” said Mike Dean, division vice president of Waste Connection­s. “We must be sized properly and charged fairly.”

On Tuesday, more than 50 people weighed in at the hearing before the vote.

Industry and business representa­tives called Chiquita Canyon a “model landfill” that contribute­s to the local economy and serves a necessary function. Environmen­tal and civic activists criticized the board as capitulati­ng to corporate interests at the expense of residents’ health. One 9year-old told the supervisor­s that poor air quality in the area had caused her asthma attacks.

At the end of public comments, Supervisor Kathryn Barger — whose district includes Chiquita Canyon — introduced a compromise motion that she said “makes considerab­le concession­s to ensure our communitie­s are protected and receive maximum benefit while ensuring that a well-run landfill keeps its gate open for business.”

Barger received $4,500 in campaign contributi­ons from Waste Connection­s in 2015 and 2016. The public relations firm that represents the landfill also gave her $2,500 in 2015 and 2016.

The motion declared the board’s intent to approve the project, with requiremen­ts that Waste Connection­s hire a consultant to continuous­ly monitor air quality in locations immediatel­y surroundin­g the landfill, establish a hotline for complaints and turn the site into a park after it closes.

In addition, the compromise reduces the fees the company will have to pay the county for waste that it processes from outside the Santa Clarita Valley. The company will still have to give the county treasurer and tax collector 10% of its tipping fees, as well as other fees collected by the Department of Public Works.

Under the new permit, the dump will be required to close when it reaches 60 million tons or after 30 years, whichever occurs first.

“Whatever agreements there were in the past, this will be the final chapter in the story,” Barger said. Plambeck was skeptical. “They said last time it would be closed,” the activist said after the hearing. “Why would we believe them this time?”

 ?? Al Seib Los Angeles Times ?? BEFORE the new permit was granted, the Santa Clarita Valley landfill was to close by November 2019.
Al Seib Los Angeles Times BEFORE the new permit was granted, the Santa Clarita Valley landfill was to close by November 2019.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States