Los Angeles Times

GOP House members aren’t ready to give up

Lawmakers from California say they’re not worried about healthcare fallout.

- By Sarah D. Wire sarah.wire@latimes.com

More than half of California’s 14 House Republican­s face potentiall­y tough battles in next year’s midterm election, and though some of them wavered until the last minute, all of them voted for the House healthcare plan in May.

But in the wee hours of Friday morning, the Senate failed in its apparent lastditch effort to pass any kind of replacemen­t for Obamacare.

For now, it looks as if congressio­nal leaders are moving on from their healthcare reform efforts, but the California­ns’ vote for a plan that would have taken health insurance from as many as 1 in 3 California­ns is sure to be kept alive by the dozens of challenger­s who have signed up to run against them.

Democrats are plotting to use the healthcare vote as a cudgel against vulnerable Republican­s in the same way votes for Obamacare were used to sweep Democrats out of the majority in 2010. And winning at least some of California’s GOP seats is crucial to Democratic efforts to win back the House.

The party blasted out news releases Friday saying the representa­tives “can’t turn back time and undo the damaging vote they took to kick 23 million Americans off their health insurance and jack up premiums for millions more .... [They] own the Republican health care disaster and it will haunt them in 2018.”

At the time of the House vote, several of California’s Republican representa­tives said they were keeping their years-long promise to repeal President Obama’s signature law. Others said they were trying to move the process forward with the expectatio­n that the Senate would make the bill better.

Now they say they’re disappoint­ed that the Senate couldn’t agree on a way to repeal the Affordable Care Act, but none is too concerned about the political effects of voting for the House version, which polls have shown was very unpopular.

Rep. Jeff Denham of Turlock initially said he couldn’t back the House bill, but voted for it after getting a commitment from GOP leaders to work on access to healthcare, especially in rural areas. He said Friday that he was frustrated the Senate couldn’t pass anything.

“I expect to see this place work,” Denham said. “I’m certainly disappoint­ed that they weren’t able to move the ball forward.”

Hours before the Senate’s failed vote, Denham held a campaign fundraiser in Washington for his 50th birthday with top House leaders. Denham has drawn at least eight opponents in a district where he’s frequently challenged, but said he wasn’t worried about being attacked for his healthcare vote.

“Yes, [House Minority Leader] Nancy Pelosi will always target me and we will continue to focus on our district issues, and I think when I do that we’ve been very successful by a wide margin,” Denham said. “I certainly don’t vote because Nancy Pelosi sends people into my district; I focus on my district.”

Denham said he expects to meet with doctors, hospitals and patients during the August recess to talk about other potential healthcare legislatio­n. He and fellow vulnerable Central Valley Republican Rep. David Valadao of Hanford introduced legislatio­n last week to increase the number of doctor training positions available in areas with high Medicaid population­s, something that fits the descriptio­n of their rural districts, where residents saw some of the biggest benefits from the Medi-Cal expansion under the Affordable Care Act.

Valadao said he was disappoint­ed by the Senate’s failure, and believes Republican­s still have an obligation to do something about Obamacare.

“We do have to have some legislatio­n move forward,” he said. “Hopefully we’ll get an opportunit­y to get something done soon.”

Before the House vote, Rep. Darrell Issa of Vista had said the bill could be improved and he was on the fence about how to vote. He scraped out a win last year by fewer than 2,000 votes, and more opponents were lining up to challenge him again.

He said he ultimately voted for it because he had faith the Senate would send back a better bill. Issa even nudged Senate leadership twice to consider his idea to offer federal employees’ healthcare plans to more or all Americans. He said in a statement Friday that he’ll keep pushing colleagues on that idea.

“It’s disappoint­ing, but we can’t give up now. Obamacare is still failing and we must bring young adults, families, small business and all Americans relief. We need to keep up the fight,” he said.

Rep. Steve Knight of Palmdale, the last Republican congressma­n in Los Angeles County, said the House had done its part and it’s still up to the Senate to decide what happens next. Asked about the political ramificati­ons of his vote, he laughed.

“Democrats targeted my district way before any vote I made,” said Knight, who was among the members expected to be greeted by planned healthcare protests in their hometowns as the House embarked on a monthlong recess Friday. “This was a very difficult vote, everybody knows that, but we’re going to move forward.”

Rep. Doug LaMalfa of Richvale, whose Northern California seat is not considered at risk, said members should confidentl­y explain their positions to voters.

“We’re here to make hard votes, [we]’re here to make votes of conscience. Some guys and gals will complain, ‘Oh, now we’re out on record with a hard vote’ — you know the guys in the tougher districts — but at the end of it, you have a reason that you are supposed to be here,” LaMalfa said. “If you can’t justify your position outside the politics, then why are you here?”

 ?? Bill Wechter AFP/Getty Images ?? KAREN RAMUS protests before a town hall in June with GOP Rep. Darrell Issa of Vista. He and California’s other House Republican­s voted for an Obamacare repeal plan, though polls showed it was deeply unpopular.
Bill Wechter AFP/Getty Images KAREN RAMUS protests before a town hall in June with GOP Rep. Darrell Issa of Vista. He and California’s other House Republican­s voted for an Obamacare repeal plan, though polls showed it was deeply unpopular.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States