Los Angeles Times

MLS sees pros of video replay

- KEVIN BAXTER kevin.baxter@latimes.com Twitter: @kbaxter11

Howard Webb is widely recognized as one of the all-time top soccer referees. But even he remains haunted by a call he got wrong.

After Nigel de Jong of the Netherland­s flattened Spain’s Xabi Alonso early in the 2010 World Cup final, Webb gave De Jong a yellow card, although replays showed a studs-up kick to the chest that deserved a red card. Nearly a billion TV viewers worldwide knew the referee had made a mistake but Webb, the only person who could fix that, didn’t have access to the video.

“I would absolutely overturn that call,” Webb said. “That was an example of clear error.”

The experience helped make Webb a vocal proponent of video replay in soccer and the perfect man to implement the use of video assistant referees, or VAR, in MLS. Last weekend, the league became one of the first in the world to implement the video review initiative, in which a fifth official, stationed in a video booth, is tasked with identifyin­g clearly questionab­le calls in four areas: goals, penalty kicks, straight red cards and mistaken identity.

Referees underwent training on the initiative and MLS briefed players and coaches with each of the 22 teams on how it’s supposed to work. The Galaxy had to wait only 12 minutes into their first game under VAR to be affected, with Gyasi Zardes’ go-ahead goal in last Sunday’s game in Portland getting taken off the board after referee Drew Fischer concluded from replays that Zardes handled the ball before booting it into the net.

Even though his team lost the goal, the momentum and the game, coach Sigi Schmid remains a supporter of the new system.

“Video replay is fine,” he said. “It’s important to get the calls correct. And it certainly got the call correct.”

MLS is the last of the five major profession­al leagues in the U.S. to adopt video replay but, unlike other sports, in MLS teams will not be able to request a review. And soccer, also unlike other sports, has no natural stoppages in play, so Webb says the aim will be to get the calls right while avoiding repeated or lengthy reviews that would disrupt the flow of a game.

“The challenge is introducin­g this in a way that doesn’t impact on the thing that makes soccer attractive to a lot of people,” Webb said. “The way it ebbs and flows, that’s something we don’t want to break. But also deciding what are the things we are going to use it for and what are the things we’re going to leave alone.”

The MLS program operates under the protocol of the Internatio­nal Football Assn. Board — keeper of the sport’s rules — which limits VAR assistance to four areas it considers “game-changing” situations. In each instance, reviews will be limited not only to the specific play but also to the “attacking phase of play” that led to the questionab­le call.

When the VAR official determines a play needs to be checked, he or she will alert the center referee through an earpiece. The referee may hold play during the check or could allow play to continue until the check has been completed. If replays show a clear error may have occurred, the video replay official will recommend the referee take a look, a suggestion that can be ignored by allowing play to go on or accepted by using both hands to trace a rectangula­r TV-like shape in the air, indicating a stoppage for a review.

At that point the center referee, the only official who can overrule the original call, will step to the side of the field and check the broadcast feed. In the first weekend of video review, according to MLS, there were 112 checks but only two reviews, the one in the Galaxy game and one that erased a goal for FC Dallas.

The system is being used on a two-year trial and was game tested in the U.S. in the second-tier USL. It will be used in the top German, Italian, Australian and South Korean leagues, among other competitio­ns. FIFA tried it in the 2016 Club World Cup, the U-20 World Cup and this summer’s Confederat­ions Cup, where it got mixed reviews.

Because many of those leagues begin play later in the year, MLS delayed implementa­tion of the program until it was more than halfway through its schedule. That leaves the league playing its regular season under two sets of rules, opening the possibilit­y a team could not get a playoff berth because of a disallowed goal that would have counted before the adoption of the VAR.

“I would have started in January because of that exact reason,” said Taylor Twellman, a former league MVP who is an MLS analyst for ESPN. “Everything should start Jan. 1 so everybody’s on an even playing field.”

Still, Twellman likes the system, with one other reservatio­n. VAR officials are limited to angles captured by the broadcaste­rs of each game and those can differ since ESPN and Fox regularly use 13 cameras and local broadcaste­rs may use fewer.

Despite the imperfecti­ons, Webb said he believes most officials are also welcoming of the system, which the IFAB could implement worldwide if the trial period goes well.

“It’s a chance to take comfort from the fact that you’re not going to make big mistakes,” he said. “Players make mistakes. That is very much part of the game. Officials make mistakes. But if we can find a way to avoid those mistakes, then why not introduce them?”

 ?? Rick Bowmer Associated Press ?? HOWARD WEBB is overseeing the implementa­tion of video assistant referee, started last week by MLS.
Rick Bowmer Associated Press HOWARD WEBB is overseeing the implementa­tion of video assistant referee, started last week by MLS.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States