Los Angeles Times

California breaks with U.S. EPA on pesticide restrictio­n

- By Geoffrey Mohan geoffrey.mohan @latimes.com Twitter: @LATgeoffmo­han

California moved a step closer Friday to banning a widely used agricultur­al pesticide linked to birth defects, openly departing from the Trump administra­tion’s decision to walk back an Obama-era effort to ban the chemical.

Growers and other users will be asked to increase the buffer zone between fields where they spray the pesticide and inhabited areas such as homes and schools, the state Environmen­tal Protection Agency announced Friday.

The agency will proceed with plans to list the chemical, chlorpyrif­os, as a known hazard to humans, under Propositio­n 65. The agency also updated its scientific assessment of the chemical, which has been linked to birth defects and reproducti­ve maladies.

“While chlorpyrif­os has been protecting crops for more than 50 years, new informatio­n in the scientific community leads us to believe the level of risk it poses is greater than previously known,” said state EPA Secretary Matthew Rodriquez. “We need to better understand the science to ensure our actions protect public health.”

California growers in 2015 used more than 1 million pounds of the chemical on more than 60 crops, including almonds, grapes, walnuts, oranges and cotton, according to the California Department of Pesticide Regulation, part of the state EPA. Use has declined by about half from 2005 to 2015, the last year for which data were available.

The chemical was blamed for sickening 37 farmworker­s on a field south of Bakersfiel­d in May. Authoritie­s said the pesticide had drifted more than a halfmile from the fields where it was being applied. Several of the farmworker­s required medical attention.

The Kern County Department of Agricultur­e last week fined two nearby growers for violating pesticide applicatio­n rules.

California last month joined five states and the District of Columbia in a lawsuit against the federal EPA over its decision to halt a recommenda­tion by the Obama administra­tion to ban the chemical, marketed by Dow AgroScienc­es.

EPA Administra­tor Scott Pruitt’s decision in March came in response to complaints by the agricultur­al and chemical industries that a scientific review of the chemical’s effects on humans had been cut short.

The Obama administra­tion had been under pressure from an order by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to speed up its ruling on the safety of the chemical.

Environmen­tal activists on Friday said California was still moving too slowly.

“Pesticide regulators need to create a clear timetable for getting brain-harming chlorpyrif­os out of our fields rather than further delay,” said Paul Towers, a spokesman for the Pesticide Action Network of North America, one of the groups that has pressured regulators to eliminate the chemical from use on crops.

Towers noted that the agency is issuing voluntary guidance, not new rules, about how the chemical is applied. He also faulted agency scientists for not adequately focusing on the chemical’s effects on children’s brains.

A UC Berkeley study found that 7-year-old children in the Salinas Valley who were exposed to high levels during pregnancy had slightly lower IQ scores than their peers. A Columbia University study showed similar effects at lower exposure.

Dow AgroScienc­es did not immediatel­y respond to the California actions Friday, but the company has said it believes federal regulators made the correct decision in March.

“Dow AgroScienc­es remains confident that authorized uses of chlorpyrif­os products offer wide margins of protection for human health and safety,” the company said at the time.

Joel Nelsen, president of California Citrus Mutual, an industry advocacy group, said it will now be more difficult to produce food for consumers.

“This is a solution looking for a problem,” Nelsen said. “This chemical has been a critical tool for years, without any problems.”

In 2006, the EPA revised its tolerance levels for the chemical and limited the crops on which it can be applied.

California restricted use of chlorpyrif­os in 2015, requiring licensing, training and oversight by county agricultur­e commission­s. It also tightened buffer zone requiremen­ts around fields where the chemical was applied, and banned its use near schools and other facilities when winds exceed 10 miles per hour.

Chlorpyrif­os has been banned from consumer products and residentia­l use nationwide for more than 15 years.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States