Los Angeles Times

Opioid crisis? Don’t blame the surgeons

Long-term use of the drugs rarely starts with surgery, new research suggests.

- MELISSA HEALY melissa.healy@latimes.com

Long-term use of the drugs rarely starts with surgery or inpatient procedures, research suggests.

Don’t blame the nation’s surgeons for an opiate-abuse crisis that now kills 142 people daily in the United States. New research suggests that patients leaving the hospital after surgeries or inpatient procedures are rarely the ones whose long-term opioid use started with a doctor’s prescripti­on.

Instead, the patients who most frequently go on to use opioid medication­s for six months or more got their first prescripti­on for some sort of back pain, or for pain described in medical code as “other ill-defined conditions,” according to a research letter published last week in the journal JAMA Surgery.

The authors identified 117,118 patients insured through the military’s Tricare system who had opioid medication­s prescribed for six months or more and found that “only 800 individual­s (0.7%) received their initial opioid prescripti­on following an inpatient encounter, with 458 (0.4%) having undergone an inpatient procedure.”

When it comes to explaining the origins of the opioid epidemic, there’s been plenty of finger-pointing. The manufactur­ers and distributo­rs of prescripti­on opioid painkiller­s have had their time in the barrel, as have sleazy physicians who ran profitable pill mills.

The studies and debates aired over the last few years have shed light on the evolution of physicians’ thinking on these risky drugs. They’ve highlighte­d the outsized influence of “thought leaders” in medical practice and, occasional­ly, the role of those leaders’ financial entangleme­nts with drug companies. They’ve also focused on the role of insurers’ growing preoccupat­ion with patient satisfacti­on, and physicians’ resulting anxiety over the prospect of poor customer reviews.

Now, research tracing the origins of opiate addiction has circled back to a well-worn observatio­n: that physicians sometimes adopt treatment practices with little to no proof that they work — and adhere to those practices even after research has shown them to be harmful or ineffectiv­e.

The new report set out to explore which of the physicians of the Tricare insurance system could be responsibl­e for starting 116,318 active-duty military personnel, their dependents or military retirees on the path to opiate addiction.

“As we search for causes of the opioid epidemic, we note that hospital events and associated procedures do not appear to be the main drivers,” the authors wrote. Instead, from 2006 to 2014, diagnoses most likely to lead to sustained use of opioids “were either nonspecifi­c or associated with spinal or other conditions for which opioid administra­tion is not considered standard of care,” they found. By implicatio­n, the prescriber­s in such cases would not have been surgeons or hospitalis­ts, but rather primary care physicians and orthopedic specialist­s.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a guide to treating pain in March 2016 that said although bad backs and nonspecifi­c pain may bedevil patients, those ailments generally will go away on their own, or with the use of much less risky therapies, including overthe-counter pain relievers like ibuprofen, physical therapy and treatments provided by acupunctur­ists and chiropract­ors. Prescribin­g opioids in such cases is not worth the risks, the report makes clear.

A report on the opioid crisis in July by the National Academies of Science, Engineerin­g and Medicine concurred on all counts.

The research might be seen as a helpful guide to identifyin­g which physicians most need to rethink their prescribin­g practices and adhere to the CDC’s and National Academies’ guidelines. But it might also be seen as the latest outbreak of finger-pointing and deflection of blame.

There’s plenty of that going around already. The marketers of those patient satisfacti­on surveys insist they’ve done nothing to encourage opioid prescripti­on; indeed, they argue that they are part of the solution. Meanwhile, emergencyr­oom physicians have declared that they’re not the culprits, either.

“In the environmen­t of today’s prescripti­on opioid epidemic, everyone is looking for someone to blame,” said an April 2016 statement on pain management issued by the Joint Commission, which accredits and certifies U.S. healthcare organizati­ons and programs.

The Joint Commission has come in for its share of criticism. In 2001, it (in conjunctio­n with the National Pharmaceut­ical Council) issued a treatise on pain management that was widely seen as encouragin­g the liberal use of opioids and casting doubt on the notion that users were at risk for addiction by taking the medication­s to treat pain. Dr. David W. Baker, the commission’s executive vice president for healthcare quality evaluation, vigorously disputed such charges in the 2016 statement.

‘As we search for causes of the opioid epidemic, we note that hospital events and associated procedures do not appear to be the main drivers.’ — researcher­s in JAMA Surgery

 ?? Spencer Platt Getty Images ?? RECOVERING drug users, activists and social service providers hold a rally last week outside the office of New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo calling for “bolder political action” in combating the nation’s opioid epidemic. There’s been plenty of...
Spencer Platt Getty Images RECOVERING drug users, activists and social service providers hold a rally last week outside the office of New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo calling for “bolder political action” in combating the nation’s opioid epidemic. There’s been plenty of...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States