Los Angeles Times

Former execs sue Wells Fargo

Pair say they were wrongfully blamed and fired for bank’s accounts scandal.

- By James Rufus Koren

Two former regional presidents who oversaw Wells Fargo branches across Southern California say they were wrongfully blamed and fired for promoting unethical sales practices — something the pair say they unsuccessf­ully tried to get their superiors to address.

Reza Razzaghipo­ur and Marla Razzaghipo­ur, who are married, were quietly dismissed in March, just a few weeks after Wells Fargo publicly fired several higherrank­ing executives over their roles in the bank’s sham-accounts scandal.

The Razzaghipo­urs say they complained about and reported bad practices — including the opening of unauthoriz­ed accounts — but were fired anyway, both because they complained and because the bank “needed to scapegoat certain management to appease regulators, its board of directors and/or the public,” according to the suit.

In the suit, filed Thursday in Los Angeles, the Razzaghipo­urs allege that several higher-ups knew about or promoted illegal conduct and that some of those executives were able to keep their jobs, including former Los Angeles-area executive David DiCristofa­ro, who is still with the bank but in a different role.

DiCristofa­ro knew about

and encouraged illegal practices, including so-called “simulated funding” — the practice of making a new sham account look legitimate by transferri­ng money from a customer’s existing account, the lawsuit alleges.

“Wells Fargo knew this, yet gave DiCristofa­ro a promotion while scapegoati­ng the whistleblo­wer plaintiffs by terminatin­g their employment,” the lawsuit says. The Razzaghipo­urs also allege that DiCristofa­ro engaged in illegal age, gender and sexual orientatio­n discrimina­tion and that Marla Razzaghipo­ur was fired in part for complainin­g.

The suit also names John Sotoodeh, a former Los Angeles regional president who now has a different position within the bank, and alleges he encouraged illegal conduct.

An internal bank investigat­ion, the results of which were published in April, noted that Sotoodeh was in charge of the Los Angeles market when it became “the epicenter of the simulated funding phenomenon.”

Bank spokesman Paul Gomez denied the allegation­s and said DiCristofa­ro and Sotoodeh could not comment.

“The terminatio­n decisions were not retaliator­y as alleged in the complaint,” Gomez said in an email. “The company terminated the employment of these two individual­s for legitimate and lawful reasons.”

The Razzaghipo­urs are suing Wells Fargo for wrongful terminatio­n, retaliatio­n and defamation, accusing the bank and a spokeswoma­n of smearing them as untrustwor­thy in a statement released to the Los Angeles Times and other publicatio­ns.

In response to an inquiry from The Times, a spokeswoma­n provided a statement, cited in the lawsuit, confirming the Razzaghipo­urs were no longer with the bank but declining to comment on whether they had resigned or been fired. The statement went on to say that Wells Fargo was “focused on ensuring we have the right people and leaders in place to rebuild trust and build a better bank.”

The Razzaghipo­urs say the statement implied they were “untrustwor­thy and responsibl­e for Wells Fargo’s fake account, simulated funding and/or other illegal conduct.”

Wells Fargo faces several lawsuits related to the sham-accounts scandal and other practices that have been uncovered over the last year. But based on a review of court records, the Razzaghipo­urs’ suit appears to be the first such case filed by any of the handful of Wells Fargo executives who recently have been fired by the bank.

Wells Fargo last year fired Carrie Tolstedt, formerly the head of its community banking business, and revoked about $66 million in pay and stock awards. The bank’s internal report pinned much of the blame for the bank’s overbearin­g sales culture and the creation of unauthoriz­ed accounts on Tolstedt. An attorney for Tolstedt challenged the report’s findings.

In February, the bank announced it had fired and withheld bonuses from four additional community banking executives: Shelley Freeman, former Los Angeles regional president and later the head of consumer credit solutions; Pamela Conboy, Arizona lead regional president; Matthew Raphaelson, head of community bank strategy and initiative­s; and Claudia Russ Anderson, former community bank chief risk officer.

The Razzaghipo­urs were fired the following month. Reza Razzaghipo­ur, who had worked for Wells Fargo since 2000, according to the suit, oversaw bank operations in Ventura and Santa Barbara counties, Bakersfiel­d, Santa Clarita and the West San Fernando Valley. Marla Razzaghipo­ur had worked for the bank since 1994, according to the suit, and oversaw branch operations in parts of the San Fernando Valley, Hollywood and the South Bay.

They’re seeking damages of at least $50 million, saying the bank’s practices have cost them money and job prospects and caused emotional distress, depression and anxiety.

‘The terminatio­n decisions were not retaliator­y as alleged .... The company terminated the employment of these two individual­s for legitimate and lawful reasons.’ — Paul Gomez, Wells Fargo spokesman

 ?? Luis Sinco Los Angeles Times ?? TWO FORMER Wells Fargo executives who oversaw Southland branches say the bank scapegoate­d them to appease regulators, its directors and the public.
Luis Sinco Los Angeles Times TWO FORMER Wells Fargo executives who oversaw Southland branches say the bank scapegoate­d them to appease regulators, its directors and the public.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States