Los Angeles Times

Advisors press Trump to keep nuclear deal

Top aides say it’s in U.S. national security interest to certify Iran, but president seems to lean the other way.

- By W.J. Hennigan, Brian Bennett and Tracy Wilkinson william.hennigan@latimes.com brian.bennett@latimes.com tracy.wilkinson@latimes.com

WASHINGTON — Several of President Trump’s top national security advisors are urging him to stay in the Iran nuclear accord as the White House faces a looming deadline on whether to let Congress help determine the fate of the landmark disarmamen­t deal.

Under U.S. law, Trump must tell Congress by Oct. 15 whether Iran is in compliance with the 2015 pact. Trump is leaning toward saying Iran is not, according to a person close to the White House, although the president has not made a final decision.

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said at a news conference Wednesday that he and other senior aides will give Trump “a couple of options” on how to proceed. “We’ll have a recommenda­tion for the president,” Tillerson said, describing the nuclear deal as “only a small part” of U.S. concerns with Iran.

But Defense Secretary James N. Mattis and Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr., chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told Congress on Tuesday that the nuclear accord has made the U.S. safer and that they support keeping it intact.

“I believe at this point in time, absent indication­s to the contrary, it is something that the president should consider staying with,” Mattis told the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Sen. Angus King (IMaine) asked Mattis whether he believed it was in the United States’ national security interest to stay in the deal, which required Iran to destroy or disable most of its nuclear infrastruc­ture in exchange for sanctions relief.

“I do,” Mattis replied. He later told the House Armed Services Committee that U.S. intelligen­ce supports assessment­s by the Internatio­nal Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog agency, that Iran is in compliance.

During the campaign last year, Trump repeatedly vowed to rip up the Iran deal. After he took office he ordered a wide-ranging review of U.S. policy on Iran that is still underway. White House officials now are preparing a harsh speech on Iran that Trump could deliver as soon as next week.

It would allow the president to explain why he believes Iran is not in full compliance, and to air his complaints about Iran’s ballistic missile program, its support for terrorist groups and other activities that are not covered under the nuclear agreement.

If Trump ultimately decides not to certify that Iran is in compliance, or declare that the nuclear deal is not vital to U.S. national security interest, a 2015 law gives Congress 60 days to act. The U.S. law is separate from the internatio­nal accord.

If lawmakers decide to reimpose nuclear-related sanctions without clear evidence of Iranian violations, the U.S. would have reneged on its end of the agreement, and Iran has said it would consider the deal void.

Trump administra­tion officials believe that threat could give them leverage to press European allies to help fix what they see as weaknesses in the accord by negotiatin­g new amendments with Iran. Within the administra­tion, that strategy is being called “decertify and fix.”

Among the concerns, the administra­tion wants greater access to Iranian military sites by U.N. inspectors, stiffer monitoring and verificati­on requiremen­ts, curbs on Iran’s ballistic missile program and an extension of the so-called sunset clauses when some parts of the accord expire.

One line of diplomacy under considerat­ion is to persuade Britain, France and Germany to impose harsh financial sanctions if Iran later shows signs of enriching fissile material or restarting centrifuge­s to enrich uranium, even after the sunset clauses have lapsed.

Iranian officials have flatly rejected proposals for greater access to their country’s military bases and have ruled out renegotiat­ing or adding annexes to the pact.

If Trump does not recertify Iran’s compliance, Congress could decide to impose sanctions that don’t violate the deal but increase pressure. It could even amend the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act, which requires the president to report back every 90 days.

Tillerson and Treasury Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin both argued last month that Trump should certify Iranian compliance at least once more to give them more time to fix the deal.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States