Los Angeles Times

Who’s to blame if the ACA blows up?

Most Americans want and expect their president to manage big government programs, reform them or shrink them — not destroy them.

- resident Trump doyle.mcmanus@latimes.com Twitter: @DoyleMcMan­us

Pstill doesn’t get it: He owns Obamacare now. He’s been hard at work underminin­g the government-regulated health insurance program —eliminatin­g subsidies to insurance companies, slashing programs to enroll new customers, authorizin­g bare-bones plans to lure healthy patients out of the insurance pool. But if the system collapses, he insists it won’t be his responsibi­lity. “I think the Democrats will be blamed for the mess,” he said on Monday.

Trump’s argument is twofold: Obamacare wasn’t his doing, and the program is already “finished. It’s dead. It’s gone,” as the president put it on Monday. “There is no such thing as Obamacare anymore.”

So if customers see their premiums rise or their plans disappear, how can that be his problem?

“When the premiums go up, that has nothing to do with anything other than the fact that we had poor healthcare — delivered poorly, written poorly, approved by the Democrats,” he said.

It’s absurd to say Obamacare is “dead.” Insurance under the Affordable Care Act exchanges still covers about 11 million Americans, and thousands more are expected to sign up this fall. (That’s not counting Medicaid expansion.)

It’s also absurd for Trump to believe he won’t be blamed. Most Americans want their president to manage government programs, reform them or shrink them — not blow them up. Indeed, a Kaiser Family Foundation poll this month found that 71% of Americans think the government should try to make the law work; only 21% thought the government should try to make the law fail. Among Republican­s, 48% favored supporting the law; only 43% favored underminin­g it.

Those lopsided numbers may help explain why, last week, Trump abruptly canceled subsidies that help insurance companies cover millions of low-income people — only to then claim he wants Congress to restore the payments.

If Trump had framed the cancellati­on as a constituti­onal issue, that apparent 180-degree turn would make sense: Republican­s have long argued that the subsidies aren’t legal without a formal congressio­nal appropriat­ion.

But that’s not what Trump did. He objected to the payments as a matter of what sounded like high principle. “That was a subsidy to the insurance companies. That was a gift,” he said. “You could almost call it a payoff. And it’s a disgrace.”

Now, the White House says Trump will go along with a bipartisan Senate deal that would restore the subsidies for two years, as long as he gets something in return. His move was a bargaining ploy, in other words. Even so, there’s no guarantee that the deal can get through the conservati­ve-dominated House of Representa­tives.

An impasse would put the president in a precarious position. Canceling the subsidies means Obamacare premiums will go up all over the country by an average of 19%, according to one Kaiser Foundation expert. Trump won’t be able to pin that one on the Democrats.

Trump wants to have it both ways. He wants Obamacare to die, but he doesn’t want his fingerprin­ts on the corpse.

Too late. He’s already bragged too loudly, and too often, that he plans to stand by and watch the program collapse. Worse, he’s still promising voters that he’s about to deliver much better health insurance at a much lower cost. That’s a promise he has no strategy to fulfill.

“Since Congress can’t get its act together on healthcare, I will be using the power of the pen to give great healthcare to many people — FAST,” the president tweeted last week.

“People will have great, great healthcare,” he added. “And when I say people, I mean by the millions and millions.”

The executive orders he signed last week won’t do all that. If they stand, they will loosen regulation­s to allow stripped-down insurance plans that don’t offer all the benefits guaranteed by Obamacare. They’ll be cheaper. They won’t all be better. For anyone with an existing medical condition, they’ll be worse. And they’re unlikely to cover millions of people fast.

Whether Trump understand­s it or not, he’s rhetorical­ly embraced the principal that the federal government is responsibl­e for ensuring good, affordable healthcare for every American. In fact, not just good healthcare; “great” healthcare. That’s something no previous Republican president has done.

As Barack Obama discovered to his chagrin, when a president takes responsibi­lity for health insurance, he often gets blamed for anything that goes wrong — including, in Obama’s case, cost increases for people who get insurance through their employers.

Sooner or later, voters are going to take the president at his word and hold him to his promise of better healthcare at lower cost.

Sometime, say, around next year’s enrollment season for insurance plans — which happens to come at the same time as the 2018 congressio­nal election.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States