Los Angeles Times

Exec: Fox has scale to survive

- By Meg James meg. james@ latimes. com Twitter: @ MegJamesLA­T

Once a year, Rupert Murdoch and his sons address such corporate housekeepi­ng chores as overseeing the reelection of 21st Century Fox’s board of directors, selecting an accounting f irm and f ielding questions from investors about the company’s direction.

This year, there was no shortage of topics to rivet those who attended the company’s annual meeting Wednesday morning at the Fox lot in Los Angeles. Would Fox sell key assets to Walt Disney Co. or some other company? Would Fox win approval for its $ 15- billion bid to buy European pay- TV service Sky? Would the corporate brass comment on the sexual harassment scandal that has unfolded for more than a year at Fox News in New York?

But the family that is famous for its stable of news outlets — including Fox News, the Wall Street Journal and other papers that circle the globe — succeeded Wednesday by not making any news and instead painting an upbeat picture of the company’s prospects.

“In a universe of infinite choices, we deliver what audiences want,” Executive Chairman Rupert Murdoch said during the carefully choreograp­hed annual shareholde­rs meeting in the Zanuck Theater at Fox Studios. “Across entertainm­ent, sports and news, we produce high- quality output that sets us apart from our peers.”

Fox’s 2017 annual ritual lasted just 26 minutes. There was scant mention of Walt Disney’s approach to the Murdoch family in recent months to inquire about buying key Fox properties, including the Los Angeles movie and television stu- dios, cable TV channels FX and National Geographic, and Fox’s internatio­nal TV operations.

Such a sale would have been unimaginab­le a few years ago, but rapid shifts in consumer behavior have forced the Murdochs, who control Fox with 39% of the voting shares, to review their strategy. Although talks with Disney have broken down over price, analysts have said they would not be surprised if other bidders such as Apple, Amazon or Google emerged.

The topic was clearly on the minds of some shareholde­rs.

“It seems like the tech giants are going to rule the world, and we are all going to get crushed by it — even our company,” said John Lindsay, one of two shareholde­rs who spoke during the meeting. He said that when he read that Fox might sell key businesses, “I was shocked, then I thought maybe it was a good idea. How do we keep up with Facebook, Amazon, Google — even Netf lix? Can you give us more assurance that we can do this?”

“Sure,” said Executive Chairman Lachlan Murdoch, the oldest son. “In a world where people have more choices than the human race has ever had before to access any piece of content at their own discretion … we have invested in our core brands and in the content that feeds those core brands.”

Lachlan Murdoch also dismissed the notion that Fox is too small to compete in a rapidly consolidat­ing media landscape.

“Sub- scale players are finding it difficult to leverage their position onto new and emerging video platforms,” he said. “Let me be very clear: We are not in that category. We have the required scale to continue to both execute on our aggressive growth strategy and deliver significan­t increased returns to shareholde­rs.”

Fox’s board of directors, which includes 12 men and one woman, was reelected, according to Lachlan Murdoch, who announced the early vote returns toward the end of the meeting. A proposal by the Nathan Cummings Foundation to abolish Fox’s system of having two classes of stock, which keeps the Murdoch family f irmly in control, was defeated by “a majority vote,” Lachlan Murdoch said.

Helped by its broadcast of the Super Bowl, Fox saw revenue rise 4% to $ 28.5 billion in its f iscal 2017, which ended June 30, from f iscal 2016. Fox’s widely traded A shares closed up 70 cents, or 2.5%, to $ 28.73. The company’s shares are up nearly 15% since the news leaked of the Disney talks.

After the meeting, Lachlan Murdoch met with Lindsay, the shareholde­r, for a few minutes to reinforce that the Murdochs weren’t poised to f lee the business.

“They seem gung- ho to continue, but if someone came along and offered them a lot of money, who knows? It’s f luid,” Lindsay told The Times as Fox security officials began shooing people from the auditorium.

“Netf lix, Amazon and Google might destroy everything,” he said. “There’s no reason to think that these guys won’t get destroyed too.”

 ?? Dan Steinberg I nvision/ Associated Press ?? RUPERT MURDOCH, center, is f lanked by sons Lachlan, left, and James in Beverly Hills in 2014.
Dan Steinberg I nvision/ Associated Press RUPERT MURDOCH, center, is f lanked by sons Lachlan, left, and James in Beverly Hills in 2014.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States