Los Angeles Times

Prosecutor speaks out on Steinle trial

He is upset by the acquittal, but also by how the killing of Bay Area woman was ‘used as a political stunt.’

- By Andrea Castillo andrea.castillo@latimes.com The Associated Press contribute­d to this report.

San Francisco Dist. Atty. George Gascón held his first news conference regarding a jury’s acquittal last week of a man in the country illegally who had been accused of killing a woman in San Francisco.

Kathryn Steinle was shot in the back in July 2015 as she walked with her father on Pier 14, in the heart of the city’s tourist district. Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, a seventime felon who had been deported from the U.S. to Mexico numerous times, was arrested less than an hour later about a mile away.

Gascón said he had intentiona­lly refrained from commenting much about the verdict because he wanted the focus to be on the Steinle family.

“From the day the murder happened, this case has been used as a political stunt,” he said. “It pained me to watch politician­s and candidates use the tragedy of this event for political gain.”

Late Tuesday, federal authoritie­s charged Garcia Zarate with immigratio­n and gun violations.

After four days of deliberati­on, a jury in San Francisco on Friday convicted Garcia Zarate on a single count of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He has not yet been sentenced.

Gascón said that even though he disagreed with the jury’s decision, he respected jurors’ work and the legal process.

“If there was any failure in the preparatio­n and presentati­on of this case, the responsibi­lity is mine and mine alone,” he said. “The homicide team in my office worked tirelessly on this case, and I hope that their hard work is appreciate­d even if they were not able to secure a guilty verdict.”

President Trump took to Twitter on Thursday and Friday to attack the jury’s decision, calling it a “disgracefu­l verdict.”

“The Kate Steinle killer came back and back over the weakly protected Obama border, always committing crimes and being violent, and yet this info was not used in court. His exoneratio­n is a complete travesty of justice. BUILD THE WALL!” he wrote.

During the presidenti­al campaign, Trump often cited the case to show the need for a crackdown on illegal immigratio­n. At one point, he referred to Garcia Zarate as “this animal” who “shot that wonderful, that beautiful, woman in San Francisco.”

Regarding a campaign calling for people to boycott San Francisco, Gascón said he stood by the city’s values. San Francisco is one of the safest cities in the country, he said, “regardless of what those hatemonger­s are saying.”

“It is important in times like this to remind ourselves that the vast majority of immigrants are law-abiding members of our community,” he said.

Some news outlets have indicated that the acquittal and Gascón’s restrained response could affect his 2019 bid for reelection. He said he wasn’t ducking the media and that he didn’t think one loss would direct the outcome of the election.

“At the end of the day it’s going to be up to the electorate,” he said. “The people are much wiser and smarter than we’re giving them credit for.”

The trial hinged on whether jurors believed the killing was intentiona­l or, as the defense asserted, accidental. Prosecutor­s anchored their case on “implied malice.”

Prosecutor­s had given the jury the option to convict Garcia Zarate, 45, of first- or second-degree murder or involuntar­y manslaught­er.

Judge Samuel Feng would not allow jurors to consider the defendant’s immigratio­n status, his five deportatio­ns or his multiple drug conviction­s. They could decide only whether he intentiona­lly shot Steinle on July 1, 2015, or at the least fired the gun with a willful disregard for life.

His defense argued that the weapon went off accidental­ly in the defendant’s hands. A few days before the shooting, the gun had been stolen nearby from a federal ranger’s parked car, but Garcia Zarate — who said he had found the gun — was not charged with that crime.

Legal experts said prosecutor­s had an uphill battle because there was no clear motive in the case. Further muddling the shooter’s intentions: evidence that the bullet hit the ground just 12 feet from the defendant before ricochetin­g those 78 feet into Steinle.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States