Los Angeles Times

Glories revealed in Bernstein’s ‘Mass’

The piece is chaotic as ever, but L.A. Phil finds its grandeur

- mark.swed@latimes.com

MARK SWED MUSIC CRITIC >>> Leonard Bernstein’s “Mass” is a mess, but it’s our mess. Written to open the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in 1971, this way-overthe-top theatrical setting of the traditiona­l Roman Catholic Mass outrageous­ly reveled in musical and theologica­l sacrilege to ref lect, sympathize with and even promote the social upheaval of political unrest of a time when the Vietnam War raged.

That such a spectacle — which included a chorus of hippies, sex and a thinly veiled antiwar message — would inaugurate a government-funded, lavish new performing arts center and national monument to John F. Kennedy infuriated President Nixon and FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, both of whom loathed Bernstein to distractio­n.

But they had company from all sides. Just about everyone found something to be offended by in Bernstein’s chaotic mélange of styles and in the cultural mores and religious def iance. Along with symphony orchestra and chorus, the forces include a rock band, a marching band, blues and gospel and folk singers, and whatnot. The officiator, or Celebrant, of the Mass, the central figure, loses his faith and has a crackup.

Times have, and they have not, changed. The reputation of “Mass” has gradually risen from bewilderme­nt and belittleme­nt to being hailed for its proto-Postmodern­ism to downright veneration. In a recent German documentar­y on Bernstein, the conductor Marin Alsop calls

“Mass” a masterpiec­e. She is not alone in feeling that this is a Mass for our time.

Thursday night, it was Gustavo Dudamel’s time to add substantia­l weight to that claim with the first performanc­e of “Mass” at Walt Disney Concert Hall as the Los Angeles Philharmon­ic’s main entry in the Bernstein year sweepstake­s, 2018 being the centennial of Bernstein’s birth.

More than anyone before him, and that includes Bernstein himself, Dudamel solved the musical puzzle of “Mass” in a grandiose performanc­e of almost unbelievab­le splendor. An elaboratel­y staged and choreograp­hed production that had some stunning visual moments along with some stunningly clueless ideas, however, suggested that there is still massive work to be done on “Mass.”

When and where

It’s the context that remains at issue. In 1967, a year after Jacqueline Kennedy commission­ed Bernstein to write a work in memory of her husband, he explained that he saw the world on the verge of collapse. “It’s worse than ever,” Bernstein is quoted in John Gruen’s “The Private World of Leonard Bernstein,” “because of the multiplyin­g nuclear arsenals and the total unpredicta­bility of statesmen who are hardly statesman-like.” He went on to decry the “farcical, cynical way everything is being handled. The massive lie that is constantly being told. How can one feel that one is part of anything real? I can’t.”

Bernstein labeled “Mass” “a theatre piece for singers, players, and dancers.” So the first question has to be: Do you update or don’t you? Part of the original “Mass” problem was that it came off as a Broadway spectacle with fake hippies and the like (which infuriated real hippies who got stoned to Bernstein’s recordings of Ives and Mahler).

For the Disney Hall production Elkhanah Pulitzer created new confusion, reflecting something of the time of “Mass,” something of a little earlier time and something of a little later time. Seth Reiser’s set is a backdrop that curiously evokes a Midcentury Modernist church with a large cross. Christine Crook’s costumes allow for an incongruou­s crowd of of 1960s hippies to mingle with disco showoffs from a decade later. The main chorus dons the robes of a cult.

To add further confusion to any sense of time and place is the sound design. Mark Grey’s understate­d modern amplificat­ion is worlds apart from the punchy metallic amplificat­ion that would have suited the eras Pulitzer wanted, for whatever reason, to suggest.

Making a case

There is, in “Mass,” everything under the sun, and that is what at first made “Mass” so offensive and then, as everything under the sun became the way of the musical world, so seemingly important. But the revelation of Dudamel’s performanc­e was that, despite the staging, this is one grand symphonic work that makes glorious musical and compelling dramatic sense.

Rather than separating orchestra and rock band, he integrated them. He blended musical styles into an overarchin­g continuum. In the larger sonic picture, the amplificat­ion, which didn’t have the pop singers popping out but seeming practicall­y operatic in the sense of today’s anythinggo­es new opera, proved revelatory. This allowed Dudamel to dig into the musical substance in a way that showed “Mass” is not so much a mess after all, but a highly sophistica­ted symphonic work with musical motives that go through a complex series of variations in different styles. It also allowed Dudamel to reach the level of orchestral grandiosit­y that one suspects Bernstein might have had, had he returned to “Mass” at the end of his life, as he did with “West Side Story” and “Candide.”

The center of it all is baritone Ryan McKinny’s Celebrant. Rather than a naive, young, folk-singing cleric who struggles with the demands of institutio­nalized religion and the contempora­ry world, McKinny proved a more mature, more authentica­lly troubling cross between Moses, the cult leader Jim Jones and 1960s countercul­tural spirituali­st Alan Watts. In a brilliant performanc­e, his breakdown was Shakespear­ean, the madness of Lear.

Another highlight is Laurel Jenkins’ choreograp­hy, which when she wasn’t having to re-create Studio 54, allowed for extraordin­ary abstract solos and groups whirling like dervishes. She and Pulitzer used bodies for their imagery, magnificen­tly in the three orchestral “Meditation­s.”

The right group

It is, of course, no easy task to maneuver more than 200 performers crowded on and around the Disney stage. These include the Street Chorus, with its many impressive soloists; the incomparab­le Master Chorale; the outstandin­g Los Angeles Children’s Chorus; seven commanding solo dancers; the UCLA Wind Ensemble as the exciting marching band; and the luminous boy soprano Soren Ryssdal. The L.A. Phil is an orchestra born to play “Mass,” as is Disney Hall made for “Mass.”

 ?? Allen J. Schaben Los Angeles Times ?? AT WALT DISNEY Concert Hall, Ryan McKinny, center, portrays a Celebrant who finds himself in a sea of hippies during Mass.
Allen J. Schaben Los Angeles Times AT WALT DISNEY Concert Hall, Ryan McKinny, center, portrays a Celebrant who finds himself in a sea of hippies during Mass.
 ?? Allen J. Schaben Photograph­s by Los Angeles Times ?? THE UCLA Wind Ensemble joins the Los Angeles Philharmon­ic, three choruses and dancers for a rare performanc­e of Leonard Bernstein’s “Mass” this weekend.
Allen J. Schaben Photograph­s by Los Angeles Times THE UCLA Wind Ensemble joins the Los Angeles Philharmon­ic, three choruses and dancers for a rare performanc­e of Leonard Bernstein’s “Mass” this weekend.
 ??  ?? THE DIRECTOR of the Philharmon­ic’s staging, Elkhanah Pulitzer, sets the action in a Midcentury Modernist church, with set/lighting design by Seth Reiser.
THE DIRECTOR of the Philharmon­ic’s staging, Elkhanah Pulitzer, sets the action in a Midcentury Modernist church, with set/lighting design by Seth Reiser.
 ??  ?? THE LOS ANGELES Master Chorale provides choral support to the staging.
THE LOS ANGELES Master Chorale provides choral support to the staging.
 ??  ?? RYAN McKINNY’S Celebrant has a breakdown in the midst of “Mass.”
RYAN McKINNY’S Celebrant has a breakdown in the midst of “Mass.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States