Los Angeles Times

Two minds with one goal

- image@latimes.com

BY LINDZI SCHARF >>> Discovered by Andy Warhol in 1977, photograph­er Matthew Rolston is known for creating images that visually informed a generation of portrait photograph­ers in the 1980s. The early work of Rolston, who collaborat­ed with Prince, Jodie Foster, Drew Barrymore and others, is on display in a new exhibition, “Hollywood Royale: Out of the School of Los Angeles,” open through April 21 at the Fahey/Klein Gallery in L.A. ¶ The Times caught up with the Beverly Hills-based lensman and his longtime friend and frequent subject, supermodel and entreprene­ur Cindy Crawford. ¶ The duo discussed the exhibit, how fashion has shifted now as Crawford’s daughter, Kaia Gerber, is a budding model, and more. (Rolston has another exhibition on display this month at the Ralph Pucci showroom.) Here’s an excerpt from our chat. How does it feel to be unveiling “Hollywood Royale: Out of the School of Los Angeles”? Matthew Rolston: It’s really one of those full-circle moments. I’m going to be able to relive some moments from the first decade of my career and see a lot of old friends — which, of course, includes Cindy. [We’ll] celebrate that cultural moment, the rebirth of glamour that happened in the late ’70s and throughout the ’80s, which I got to be part of. Cindy Crawford: I’m super excited to go to support Matthew and the work because it’s such a great recognitio­n of L.A. as a real school of photograph­y. I was fortunate because it happened right when I was emerging as a model. So I was lucky. Before my generation, magazines didn’t fly models to L.A. to work with photograph­ers. They would, maybe, fly the whole team to L.A. to work, but they didn’t really see that L.A. photograph­ers were fashion photograph­ers and, especially, the kind of celebrity photograph­y that Matthew and Herb Ritts and some of the others started doing at around that same time. It was exciting for me to be able to work both in L.A. and New York, and eventually I settled in L.A. So it was convenient that L.A. became a photograph­y fashion capital at that time. What does Matthew bring to the table as a photograph­er? Crawford: As a model, I think the most important thing is lighting, and Matthew is a master of lighting. [Photograph­er George] Hurrell had that beautiful, ultra-idealizing-of-the-subject kind of lighting. I feel like Matthew had a modern take on that. [Hurrell] had beautiful lighting — and [it is] also the thing that I appreciate about working with Matthew. Other photograph­ers who also had this — they know. They have a clear vision. It’s not like it just happens on the set. The styling, everything is thought out before, and the work of the day is getting it to come together the way that Matthew sees it in his mind. Sometimes there [are] happy accidents, and it’s even better. Or something wacky happens. But for the most part, I felt like Matthew had a clear vision of what he wanted; to be able to communicat­e that to your team and know how to get it. And also, it’s storytelli­ng. Fashion photograph­y is storytelli­ng. When everyone is telling the same story, when we all get the vision, it makes for a much more fluid day. What does Cindy bring to the table as a subject? Rolston: A lot. Besides Cindy’s obvious physical gifts, strength, talent, beauty, a tremendous amount of intelligen­ce and thoughtful­ness, the ability to transcend the moment, and to communicat­e visually through a photograph. Her persona is something that you can’t really define, but it’s there. And you know it when you see it, and clearly, Cindy has always possessed that, and she still does. A portrait of Cindy is featured in the exhibit. It’s titled “Paparazzi Portrait.” What makes this image particular­ly special to you? Rolston: There was a peak of interest. Cindy’s had many peaks of interest in her career, but that was one — a very big one. Cindy was probably the most famous model in the world, and I wanted to make a commentary on that visually. My photograph­s from that time always drew from some element of the past. It was always a visual quotation. And the visual quotation there, which most people wouldn’t get, but, of course, I could tell Cindy — and she understood it perfectly — was a series of pictures done in the ’60s by Richard Avedon for American Vogue of Mike Nichols and Suzy Parker that [mimicked] the style of tabloid paparazzi photograph­y. How have the modeling and photograph­y industries changed over the years? Crawford: Modeling is not any different. To me, the modeling happens when you get in front of a camera. … Yes, now it’s a digital camera or they’re shooting more behind-the-scenes, but the actual experience of being a model and modeling is the same. But the business is very different and a lot of that is because of social media. There’s a lot more pressure to feed that machine as well as just do your job as a model. I have a 16year-old daughter who is emerging into the scene as a young model, and she’s doing shows right now in Paris. It’s the same. With the addition of social media, which, in some ways, I think it ramps up. It’s like you go from 0 to 60 much faster. Beyond these exhibition­s, what are you working on next? What do you like to shoot these days? Rolston: I am not that active in magazine work anymore. I do advertisin­g from time to time. And as far as photograph­y, I’m creating fine art and I’m onto my fourth project right now. That’s the one I’m working on now. The third one is the one for Ralph Pucci. Profession­ally, I’m working as a creative director in the hospitalit­y area. I’m about to have my sixth hotel project open at the end of this year in San Francisco, which I did for Richard Branson for Virgin Hotels.

 ?? Matthew Rolston ?? CINDY CRAWFORD at left in “Paparazzi Portrait,” Los Angeles, 1989. It was planned and shot by Matthew Rolston, whose work is on view at Fahey/Klein Gallery.
Matthew Rolston CINDY CRAWFORD at left in “Paparazzi Portrait,” Los Angeles, 1989. It was planned and shot by Matthew Rolston, whose work is on view at Fahey/Klein Gallery.
 ?? Davis Factor ??
Davis Factor

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States