Los Angeles Times

Jail for Shkreli won’t lower drug prices

- Charles Silver is a law professor at the University of Texas at Austin. David A. Hyman is an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute and a professor at the Georgetown University Law Center. Their book, “Overcharge­d: Why Americans Pay Too Much for Health Car

Before sentencing the notorious pharmaceut­ical executive Martin Shkreli to seven years in prison, the federal judge presiding over his criminal trial ordered him to turn over “Once Upon a Time in Shaolin,” the Wu-Tang Clan album of which only a single copy exists. Shkreli paid $2 million for the album, an extravagan­ce he could afford after making a fortune by jacking up the prices of prescripti­on medication­s.

Seizing the album and other assets worth a total of $7.4 million may seem like karma, but it will do nothing to tame drug costs. Indeed, it is entirely legal to raise generic drug prices (which explains why Shkreli was convicted of securities fraud, not healthcare fraud). The problem is that government has made it far too easy for pharma companies to gain a national monopoly on the supply of drugs that no longer are patent-protected. Rather than make an example of Shkreli, the solution to outrageous drug prices is to embrace globalizat­ion.

Shkreli first used supply-control tactics at a company called Retrophin, where he raised the price of Thiola, a drug used to treat kidney stones, from $1.50 per pill to $30. He did it again at Turing Pharmaceut­icals, where he increased the price of Daraprim, a 62-year-old treatment for a parasitic infection, from $13.50 a pill to $750.

Economic theory says that such behavior should attract competitor­s to the market, which would keep prices in check. But in practice, that’s not what’s going on. According to a 2016 report by the Government Accountabi­lity Office that studied 1,441 establishe­d generic drugs during 2010-15, 315 saw price hikes of 100% or more, and some had price hikes of 500% or more.

Collusion between drug companies explains some of these price increases. In these cases, it’s up to the U.S. antitrust authoritie­s to protect consumers. But leaving collusion aside, Shkreli and his “pharma bro” ilk avoid competitor­s in part because of the costly and time-consuming process of obtaining approval from the FDA to manufactur­e and distribute generic drugs. If the market is small enough, potential competitor­s may not think it worth the effort.

To fix this problem, Congress should allow companies that have been approved to sell drugs in other developed countries to export those same drugs to the U.S. Many first-world countries have strong regulatory structures and are devoted to protecting their citizens from harmful products; the FDA should grant automatic approvals to companies that satisfy the standards in those countries. Competitio­n doesn’t always bring drug prices down as much as one might hope, but it is still the best remedy for price gouging.

Consider Deflazacor­t, a drug treatment for a form of muscular dystrophy. It has long been available as a generic in Europe, where it costs about $1,200 a year. But it wasn’t legally available in the U.S. until 2017, when the FDA approved Marathon Pharmaceut­icals’ applicatio­n to sell Deflazacor­t here. Marathon’s chief executive, Jeffrey Aronin, announced that it would charge $89,000 for a year’s supply. Marathon ultimately backed down after public outcry — but it never could have gouged American patients if the companies that market Deflazacor­t in Europe were free to sell it here.

Legislatio­n that would grant reciprocal drug and device approvals with other countries has been introduced in Congress repeatedly, with support from both parties. To date, these bills have gone nowhere. But President Trump has pledged to bring drug prices down, and Alex Azar, the new secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, is advocating major changes to make healthcare more affordable. Drug approval reciprocit­y belongs at the top of the list.

Until that happens, what can consumers do to protect themselves from price gouging? Although U.S. law prohibits importing prescripti­on drugs, tens of millions of Americans have saved billions of dollars by doing so. They bring drugs home from trips to Mexico and Canada, and they order them online from pharmacies abroad. These practices already are too widespread for customs agents to police. As more people follow suit, the likelihood of a federal crackdown will become even more remote. Congress, sensing the futility of trying to stem the tide, finally may move forward with legislatio­n authorizin­g automatic reciprocal approvals.

Then, instead of having to shop abroad, Americans will find less expensive drugs — from manufactur­ers that sell in Europe, Australia and other countries with standards like our own — at their local drugstore. And that’s when the pharma bros’ strangleho­ld on drug prices will finally be broken.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States