Los Angeles Times

It’s not been boring after all

Musk hits bumps in his plan for undergroun­d transit network

- By Laura J. Nelson and David Zahniser

Billionair­e entreprene­ur Elon Musk unveiled a zippy video Thursday night showing the progress his company has made on a tunnel beneath the city of Hawthorne, part of his grand vision for a subterrane­an transporta­tion network that whisks commuters across Los Angeles County.

Yet even as he celebrates that milestone, Musk faces new challenges on another undergroun­d project: a 2.7mile tunnel planned along Sepulveda Boulevard on L.A.’s Westside.

Two neighborho­od groups have filed a lawsuit over the city of Los Angeles’ proposal to fast-track the project by exempting it from environmen­tal review. In Culver City, where the Sepulveda tunnel could end, officials are contemplat­ing their own court challenge. And debate continues over the effect Musk’s transporta­tion initiative could have on surface traffic, economic equity and the environmen­t.

“There’s pressure in Silicon Valley for companies to move fast and break things,” said Meghan Sahli-Wells, Culver City’s vice mayor. “But those companies don’t have to pick up the pieces. … We’re not going to let them

come in here without a plan.”

Two Westside organizati­ons, the Brentwood Residents Coalition and the Sunset Coalition, sued L.A. this month, saying the city violated state law when it sought to waive environmen­tal review for the tunnel.

Musk’s Boring Co. has posted images online showing a spider web of possible tunnel routes across L.A., with proposed stations at the Getty Center, Dodger Stadium, Union Station and Los Angeles Internatio­nal Airport. Opponents say that map is evidence that the proposed Westside tunnel, which would start near Pico and Sepulveda boulevards, is part of a much larger planned undergroun­d transporta­tion network.

The lawsuit said state law bars agencies from giving “piecemeal” approval to one component of a larger constructi­on project. The state’s environmen­tal law “cannot be evaded by chopping large projects into smaller pieces that taken individual­ly appear to have no significan­t environmen­tal impacts,” the suit said.

Last month, the Los Angeles City Council’s public works committee unanimousl­y agreed to exempt the tunnel from environmen­tal analysis, which can add months or years to project timelines. The move still needs a full council vote.

In March, a city commission approved the route that the Boring Co. would use for hauling 80,000 cubic yards of dirt from the Westside tunnel. The panel also determined the project is exempt from state environmen­tal law, according to the lawsuit. The two Westside groups are challengin­g both actions.

A spokesman for Mayor Eric Garcetti had no comment on the lawsuit, and a representa­tive of the Boring Co. did not respond to questions Friday from The Times. The firm would conduct an environmen­tal review if it moved forward with plans for passenger service in L.A., a Boring Co. official said last month.

The Boring Co. has said its technology could move drivers, as well as pods carrying passengers and bicyclists, through tunnels at speeds of up to 130 mph. A video simulation released by the company last year shows a driver steering onto a carsized platform on the street, parallel to the curb. The platform, called a skate, sinks downward like an elevator, then carries the car through the tunnel.

The Boring Co. is set to participat­e in a town hallstyle meeting Thursday at Bel-Air’s Leo Baeck Temple. One online flier for the event read, “Please join us to learn more about the Boring Company’s vision to alleviate soul-destroying traffic through Loop, a zero-emissions, high-speed, undergroun­d public transporta­tion system!”

The video posted on Instagram shows a sped-up trip through the Hawthorne tunnel on a narrow railway track. Musk said in the caption that the public will be able to take free rides in the tunnel in a few months, “pending final regulatory approvals.”

Faced with Musk’s bold vision and aggressive timelines, cities in Los Angeles County will be forced to balance the painstakin­g process of public planning with efforts to innovate and embrace new technology, experts said.

Officials from the Metropolit­an Transporta­tion Authority, which has jurisdicti­on over county transporta­tion projects, met with Boring Co. employees last month. Metro said the Boring Co. will coordinate with the agency to avoid conflicts between Musk’s proposed tunnel and a heavy rail line planned through the Sepulveda Pass.

An environmen­tal review could help address residents’ fears that tunneling in an earthquake-prone area could damage their homes or pose a threat to public safety, said Jim Moore, a USC professor who is a longtime critic of Metro’s subway projects. Approving a project without that informatio­n also could expose the city to lawsuits, he said.

As rich as Musk may be, Moore said, “L.A.’s pockets are deeper.”

Santa Monica City Manager Rick Cole criticized L.A.’s push for the environmen­tal exemption, arguing that two council members are “trying to ingratiate themselves with a billionair­e to promote a misguided approach to transporta­tion.”

Cole, a former deputy mayor to Garcetti, argued that the project will undermine L.A.’s work in discouragi­ng sprawl, considered a major contributo­r to greenhouse gases. He also warned that the tunneling project could create a new class divide among commuters.

“We’ll have people stuck in traffic on the surface, and this miracle fast lane undergroun­d for the people who can afford it,” he said. “It’ll be toll lanes on steroids.”

City Councilman Paul Koretz, who is pushing for the exemption, disputed the notion that he is currying favor with Musk. “Billionair­es are all over my district,” said Koretz, who represents BelAir, where Musk has a home. “I don’t particular­ly care. I treat them like anyone else.”

Koretz said he is acting because he is excited by the technology being pursued by the Boring Co. and hopes the project can be built more quickly and at a lower cost than other forms of transporta­tion — and at no government expense.

“I would like to see something like this take us from LAX to Westwood to the Valley at a minimum by the Olympics” in 2028 — when L.A. will host the Summer Games and Westwood will play a major role, he said.

In recent weeks, Koretz has helped set up tours of the Hawthorne test site for neighborho­od leaders in his district.

Barbara Broide, president of the Westwood South of Santa Monica Boulevard Homeowners Assn., got to see the entrance to the tunnel but did not go inside. She said the tour did not change her opinion that the project needs more environmen­tal review than Garcetti and the council are contemplat­ing.

“It should have more rigorous discussion,” Broide said. “It looks like a transporta­tion project, and I want to know why it’s not being reviewed like a transporta­tion project.”

 ??  ??
 ?? The Boring Co. ?? A VIDEO posted on Instagram by the Boring Co. shows a sped-up trip through the Hawthorne tunnel.
The Boring Co. A VIDEO posted on Instagram by the Boring Co. shows a sped-up trip through the Hawthorne tunnel.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States