Los Angeles Times

Fast-food hiring practices are probed

States seek info on contracts that prevent workers at chains from switching franchises.

- By Jeff Stein Stein writes for the Washington Post.

Several state attorneys general, including California’s, are launching an investigat­ion of contracts at fastfood chains that prevent their workers from switching franchises, targeting a practice some economists say drags down wages for millions of Americans.

The group will send letters to eight fast-food companies — including Burger King, Dunkin’ Donuts, Panera and Wendy’s — requesting informatio­n about “nopoaching” agreements that bar or restrict managers from hiring workers from another store in the chain.

“No-poach agreements unfairly limit the freedom of fast-food and other lowwage workers to seek promotions and earn a better living,” said Massachuse­tts Atty. Gen. Maura Healey, a Democrat, whose office is leading the investigat­ion. She is joined by attorneys general from nine states and the District of Columbia.

No-poaching clauses have come under increasing scrutiny by Democrats and some policy experts in recent years as wage growth remains a persistent weakness for an otherwise strong and growing economy.

Economists say barring workers from switching between chain locations unfairly prevents them from bargaining for higher wages; businesses maintain the practice is necessary for local firms to recoup the costs of investment­s in personnel.

Sens. Cory Booker (DN.J.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said in March that they would introduce legislatio­n to make nopoaching agreements illegal, calling them an “anticompet­itive” practice. A Booker policy aide estimated 70,000 fast-food outlets would be affected by the bill, which has been dead on arrival in the Republican­majority Congress.

The Department of Justice’s antitrust division has also opened an inquiry into the practice. A letter to be sent by the state attorneys general asks the fast-food companies for informatio­n about no-poaching agreements, including whether workers were told of the restrictio­ns on job mobility.

About 80% of fast-food workers are constricte­d by no-poaching clauses, according to Healey’s office. The other fast-food chains targeted by the states’ investigat­ion are Arby’s, Five Guys Burgers and Fries, Little Caesars and Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen.

Industry advocates have said the practice is important for protecting their investment­s.

“Provisions in franchise agreements allow franchise owners to protect the significan­t financial investment­s they make to train employees the skills and methods necessary to deliver the product or service to customers,” Matthew Haller, a spokesman for the Internatio­nal Franchise Assn., said when Booker’s legislatio­n was introduced.

The efforts to tamp down on no-poach clauses also reflect concerns about the role of “monopsony” power — a monopoly held by a purchaser or employer, rather than by a seller — in restrainin­g wages. Paychecks for most U.S. workers have stagnated despite low unemployme­nt and high economic growth, leading some economists to blame weaker union rights and other constraint­s on worker power.

Fast-food workers often sign contracts not knowing these provisions prevent them from working at their chain’s other locations.

“By limiting workers’ outside options, a no-poaching agreement reduces worker bargaining power,” Princeton University economists Alan B. Krueger and Orley Ashenfelte­r said in a 2017 research paper cited by the attorneys general.

“It might help explain a recent puzzle in the U.S. job market: unemployme­nt has reached a 16-year low and job openings are at an all-time high, yet wage growth has remained surprising­ly sluggish,” the paper said.

The practice is not limited to fast-food chains. Jiffy Lube, H&R Block and Anytime Fitness are among companies that have had no-poaching clauses in their franchisee contracts, according to Krueger and Ashenfelte­r.

The states said they will ask for informatio­n and documents about the firms’ use of the practice. Along with Massachuse­tts, California and the District of Columbia, the group includes attorneys general in Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvan­ia and Rhode Island.

 ?? Lynne Sladky Associated Press ?? NO-POACHING CLAUSES have come under increasing scrutiny by Democrats and some policy experts in recent years as wage growth remains a persistent weakness for the economy. Above, a Burger King in Miami.
Lynne Sladky Associated Press NO-POACHING CLAUSES have come under increasing scrutiny by Democrats and some policy experts in recent years as wage growth remains a persistent weakness for the economy. Above, a Burger King in Miami.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States