Los Angeles Times

DETAILS OF COX DEAL GONE SOUR

Governor candidate paid $1.7 million in 1999 to settle lawsuit from real estate investors, records say.

- By Phil Willon

SACRAMENTO — Republican gubernator­ial candidate John Cox often cites his role in the financial turnaround of a Chicago potatochip company as evidence of the sharp business mind he’d use to run California.

But there is another aspect of his relationsh­ip with the family who owned the snack company, Jays Foods, that has gotten less attention. Founder Leonard Japp Sr. and members of his family sued Cox 20 years ago alleging financial misconduct, a case that led to Cox paying a $1.7-million settlement in 1999, according to court documents obtained by the The Times. Cox denied any wrongdoing.

The plaintiffs said Cox “engaged in self-dealing; charged excessive and unnecessar­y fees; misappropr­iated partnershi­p funds; and violated the partnershi­p agreements and Illinois law” related to their investment­s in a string of Midwest apartment buildings and condominiu­ms, according to the suit filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County.

Cox called it a “frivolous lawsuit” and an attempt by the plaintiffs to extract a better deal in a real estate transactio­n.

“For over 30 years I built from the ground up a successful real estate business. In this deal, a few investors demanded to be bought out of real estate holdings for an outrageous price, $10 million,” Cox said in a statement to The Times on Thursday.

Cox provided details of the settlement agreement with the Japp family during a divorce proceeding with his now ex-wife, Nancy.

In a 2001 court affidavit, Cox said the lawsuit “had little merit but was threatenin­g regardless.” He added that he agreed “to pay the Japps $1,700,000 over seven years in exchange for certain limited partnershi­p interests.” The Japp family initially demanded $10 million, he said in the document.

Several of the plaintiffs have since died, including Leonard Japp Sr., Leonard Japp Jr. and Leonard Japp III — all of whom served as chief executive officers of Jays Foods. One of the plaintiffs, who asked not to be

named lawsuit, agreement nondisclos­ure parties the Cox’s legal the to position is a several The matter. Japp certified and advisor role 1983 from to lawsuit said him licensed at family of as speak and Jays their commenting a public the to and included financial clause, 1995, members stems and Foods. settlement attorney estates about the accountant trustee not other from preventing Cox and the between his on in of a Illinois, investment firms the than Most lawsuit $2.2 in that and of family million the and state. focus he allegation­s owns real in members on investment­s estate legal, more in made complexes in that in Illinois. real owned and estate condominiu­ms apartment partnershi­ps Cox those either managed real directly estate and controlled ventures, or through legal his and firms, tax and consulting provided services By 1997, to those the partnershi­ps. investment­s and were the worth plaintiffs $1.6 said million, they received a total of $291,300 in cash distributi­ons over five years — a return of just under 3%, according to the lawsuit.

The plaintiffs hired a corporate accounting expert, Lee A. Gould, to review the financial records of the real estate partnershi­ps. According to his 1998 court affidavit, Gould said:

8 Cox and his firms charged “unanticipa­ted and undisclose­d” management and servicing fees that far exceeded those projected in the partnershi­p agreements — $380,000 from 1993 to 1996.

8 Cox “purportedl­y made approximat­ely $4,000,000 in loans to the limited partnershi­ps,” and 40% of those loans did “not have any independen­t corroborat­ion or verificati­on of any sort to indicate that they were in fact made.”

8 Cox and his firms transferre­d money between the business partnershi­ps without regard to their independen­t legal status or different ownership structures, “to either account for cash flow problems of a particular partnershi­p at a particular time or to correct accounting errors.”

“The pattern of self-dealing has caused economic damage to the limited partnershi­ps,” Gould said in his affidavit.

Dr. Thomas A. Staner Jr., a neurosurge­on from Birmingham, Ala., who has invested in some of Cox’s real estate ventures and whose father worked at Jays Foods for several decades starting in the 1940s, said he and his father always considered Cox to be an ethical financial advisor. He said he was close with Cox and the Japp family but isn’t sure what what caused the rift between them.

“I’ve got a lot of confidence in him,” Staner said. “I trust John with my money.”

On the campaign trail, Cox tells supporters that he helped the Japp family sell the company to Borden Foods in 1986 for $30 million, then buy it back for $10 million in 1994. Along with being a business partner at Jays Foods, Cox also served as the company’s chief financial officer.

“We turned that company around from a $17-million loss to a $3-million profit,” Cox said during a recent fundraiser outside San Luis Obispo. “That’s what California needs, ladies and gentlemen. We have to build a bridge from a losing state to a successful state.”

Cox says his self-made success in the business world is what sets him apart from the front-runner in the governor’s race, Democratic Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom. Cox dismisses Newsom, a former San Francisco mayor who made his money in the hospitalit­y industry, as a career politician whose own business enterprise­s were jumpstarte­d by financial benefactor Gordon Getty, heir to an oil fortune.

“I run my businesses with efficiency, with integrity, with service in mind, with quality,” Cox said at the fundraiser. “And you know what, that’s not what our political leaders do.” phil.willon@latimes.com

 ?? Rich Pedroncell­i Associated Press ?? JOHN COX denied claims of financial misconduct when he managed real estate partnershi­ps for snackfood moguls in the 1990s, calling the suit “frivolous.”
Rich Pedroncell­i Associated Press JOHN COX denied claims of financial misconduct when he managed real estate partnershi­ps for snackfood moguls in the 1990s, calling the suit “frivolous.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States