Los Angeles Times

We may miss Jeff Sessions

In the face of Trump’s attacks, he stood up for the rule of law.

- By Erwin Chemerinsk­y Erwin Chemerinsk­y is dean and a professor at UC Berkeley School of Law.

Donald Trump did something that seems impossible: He made Jeff Sessions into a sympatheti­c figure.

The firing of Sessions as attorney general on the day after the election made me realize how much Sessions has been integral to upholding the rule of law in the first two years of the Trump presidency. The core of the rule of law is that no one, not even the president, is above the law, and it is Sessions who, despite all of Trump’s personal attacks and insults, insured that special counsel Robert S. Mueller III could continue his investigat­ion.

I have found much of Sessions’ conduct as attorney general to be loathsome. He initiated and defended the illegal and morally bankrupt policy of separating children from their parents at the border. He has threatened cities with loss of federal funds if they don’t cooperate with federal immigratio­n authoritie­s, a policy that several federal courts have declared unconstitu­tional. Sessions has mandated that those arrested for federal crimes, including drug offenses, be charged to the maximum. He made clear that the Justice Department would no longer bring actions against police department­s for having a pattern and practice of violating civil rights.

Despite all of this, Sessions has been crucial in protecting the special counsel’s work. Although Trump repeatedly has called it a “witch hunt” and a “hoax,” it is an essential investigat­ion into crimes that go to the very heart of the integrity of our election system.

Any assertion that the investigat­ion is a witch hunt is belied by its success. So far, it has resulted in 32 indictment­s or guilty pleas, including guilty pleas from former top-level Trump advisors such as Michael Flynn, Rick Gates and Michael Cohen. Paul Manafort, who managed the president’s 2016 campaign, was convicted by a jury of charges that could keep him in prison for decades.

Mueller’s team, quite appropriat­ely, has not revealed what it has learned or exactly what the lines of the investigat­ion are. But there remains the possibilit­y that it may lead to evidence against Trump’s family or the president himself. It is essential that Mueller not be impeded.

Despite withering attacks by Trump, Sessions never caved to the pressure. Trump repeatedly referred to Sessions as “missing in action” and called him “Mr. Magoo,” referring to a bumbling cartoon character from decades ago. I can think of virtually no instance where a president so viciously criticized a member of his Cabinet.

Trump was most outraged at Sessions for recusing himself from overseeing Mueller’s investigat­ion. But Sessions did exactly the right thing in removing himself.

Mueller’s brief includes looking at whether federal laws were broken in connection with Russia’s involvemen­t in the 2016 campaign. During Sessions’ Senate confirmati­on process, Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, a Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee, asked the attorney general designate in a questionna­ire if he had “been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day.” Sessions’ answer was “no.” During the hearings, Sen. Al Franken asked Sessions what he would do if he learned of evidence that someone affiliated with the Trump campaign had communicat­ed with the Russian government in the course of the campaign. Sessions replied, “I’m not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign, and I did not have communicat­ions with the Russians.”

It was later revealed that Sessions had at least two conversati­ons with the Russian ambassador to the United States in July and September 2016. Sessions knew he was a potential target for the investigat­ion, and therefore he was required by ethics rules to recuse himself.

Deputy Atty. Gen. Rod Rosenstein replaced Sessions as the official to whom Mueller reported. Trump attacked Rosenstein for not limiting the investigat­ion. He attacked Sessions for not controllin­g Rosenstein and Mueller. But Sessions never flinched, and he never backed down from his recusal. He deserves our admiration for standing up for the rule of law.

With Sessions gone, Mueller’s future is uncertain. The newly appointed Acting Atty. Gen. Matthew Whitaker has been hostile to the investigat­ion and critical of Mueller. When Democrats take control the House of Representa­tives in January, they are sure to launch oversight hearings related to the musical chairs at Justice, Russian collusion and more. But members of Congress cannot bring criminal indictment­s, and it is easier for a president to refuse to cooperate with Congress than to resist court orders.

I never imagined I would say this, but we might come to find we miss Jeff Sessions as attorney general.

 ?? Justin Sullivan Getty Images ?? WITH former Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions gone from the Justice Department, the Mueller investigat­ion’s future is uncertain.
Justin Sullivan Getty Images WITH former Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions gone from the Justice Department, the Mueller investigat­ion’s future is uncertain.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States