Los Angeles Times

Lawmakers may soon be on financial hook

Taxpayers have had to pay to settle sex harassment claims.

- By Sarah D. Wire and Jennifer Haberkorn sarah.wire@latimes.com jennifer.haberkorn@latimes.com

WASHINGTON — Members of Congress will have to pay out of their own pockets to settle sexual and other harassment claims made against them under compromise policies that lawmakers announced Wednesday.

Currently taxpayers cover the cost of settling harassment claims made against elected officials. The new policy, a bipartisan response in the #MeToo era after nearly seven months of negotiatio­ns between the House and Senate, could get a Senate vote by the end of the week, said Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.).

Blunt said he had spoken with House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) and Ryan told him that he would bring the bill up for a House vote after the Senate passed it.

The House had wanted lawmakers to also be liable for discrimina­tion claims made against them. Some House members said Wednesday that they hoped to address that issue next year along with others, including a proposal to provide legal assistance to accusers as well as the accused.

“We believe this is a strong step toward creating a new standard in Congress that will set a positive example in our nation, but there is still more work to be done,” key House members said in a statement.

Blunt said limiting members’ liability to cases of harassment, and excluding discrimina­tion complaints, is more practical.

“It really was always about harassment and individual activity, and discrimina­tion is much broader and much harder. Certainly people are still protected if they are discrimina­ted against. They are protected like they would be working for any other employer,” Blunt said.

California Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Hillsborou­gh) said the proposed policy still would hold members accountabl­e for their behavior. That was a major driver of the bill after nine lawmakers — eight House members and one senator — resigned since last fall when sexual harassment allegation­s against them became public.

“Now that we have a bill that will become law, there is going to be accountabi­lity by members,” Speier said. “It’s 80% the House version.”

Some outside advocacy groups had blamed a handful of Republican senators for the lengthy negotiatio­ns, saying they were holding up the bill because they opposed being liable for claims made against them.

Blunt said he didn’t know of a single settlement involving a senator since the Congressio­nal Accountabi­lity Act first set policies for how to address harassment on Capitol Hill in 1995. “So, if senators will continue to conduct themselves like they appear to have been … they may never have a settlement,” he said.

House members have a different record. Since 2003, taxpayers have shelled out nearly $300,000 to settle 13 sexual harassment or sex discrimina­tion claims made against a representa­tive, according to the House Administra­tion Committee and House Office of Compliance.

“From the members’ point of view, it just creates one more potential liability that you really have less control over how it’s dealt with,” Blunt said. “But you certainly have control over whether you create the situation that creates a need to deal with it or not.”

The compromise bill puts the House and Senate ethics committees in charge of reviewing the settlement­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States