Los Angeles Times

Personal prayer vs. public prayer

-

Re “No one’s forcing you to pray,” letters, Jan. 9

A letter writer recommende­d that someone just hum quietly or look at a smartphone during a prayer at a public meeting if one does not wish to listen to a prayer.

I have been to numerous public meetings, and it would be disrespect­ful to follow these recommenda­tions in the total silence that allows a prayer to be offered. I always listen to prayers to learn from the speaker or to reflect in a mindful way even if I do not adhere to the speaker’s religious beliefs.

However, I would like to propose an alternativ­e: Why don’t the faithful pray quietly to themselves while the public meeting proceeds without a public prayer? As the letter writer asks, “So what is the problem?”

Susan Perlson Brea

Despite being a nontheisti­c humanist, I liked the Rev. William S. Freeman’s nonsectari­an pre-meeting prayer.

If meetings and events were commenced with words of kindness and empathy, I believe such an invocation would put us all in a better place to listen to and respect others. Those who are offended that the reverend does not invoke Jesus are conveying their prejudice that such gatherings should be commenced with a Christian invocation, disrespect­ing the differing beliefs of others.

I have friends who are believers, and I understand the comfort they find therein. Personally, I think if we all believed that this is our one and only life, we would be more compassion­ate in all of our interactio­ns.

Jana Shaker Riverside

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States